For many people, one of the highlights of the Oscar ceremony last Sunday was Jerry Seinfeld introducing the Best Documentary Oscar with a little bit of stand-up about going to the movies, where he poked some fun at the nominees as ‘depressing.’ If that was an audition for hosting the next ceremony… consider me sold.
Not as happy is John Sinno, nominee for the documentary Iraq in Fragments. He’s a little ticked off, enough so that he sent an open letter to the Academy – as well as to people like me. So here’s John’s letter:
I had the great fortune of attending the 79th Academy Awards following my nomination as producer for a film in the Best Documentary Feature category. At the Awards ceremony, most categories featured an introduction that glorified the filmmakers’ craft and the role it plays for the film audience and industry. But when comedian Jerry Seinfeld introduced the award for Best Documentary Feature, he began by referring to a documentary that features himself as a subject, then proceeded to poke fun at it by saying it won no awards and made no money. He then revealed his love of documentaries, as they have a very "real" quality, while making a comically sour face. This less-than-flattering beginning was followed by a lengthy digression that had nothing whatsoever to do with documentary films. The clincher, however, came when he wrapped up his introduction by calling all five nominated films "incredibly depressing!"
While I appreciate the role of humor in our lives, Jerry Seinfeld’s remarks were made at the expense of thousands of documentary filmmakers and the entire documentary genre. Obviously we make films not for awards or money, although we are glad if we are fortunate enough to receive them. The important thing is to tell stories, whether of people who have been damaged by war, of humankind’s reckless attitude toward nature and the environment, or even of the lives and habits of penguins. With his lengthy, dismissive and digressive introduction, Jerry Seinfeld had no time left for any individual description of the five nominated films. And by labeling the documentaries “incredibly depressing,” he indirectly told millions of viewers not to bother seeing them because they’re nothing but downers. He wasted a wonderful opportunity to excite viewers about the nominated films and about the documentary genre in general.
To have a presenter introduce a category with such disrespect for the nominees and their work is counter to the principles the Academy was founded upon. To be nominated for an Academy Award is one of the highest honors our peers can give us, and to have the films dismissed in such an offhand fashion was deeply insulting. The Academy owes all documentary filmmakers an apology.
Seinfeld’s introduction arrived on the heels of an announcement by the Academy that the number of cities where documentary films must screen to qualify for an Academy Award is being increased by 75%. This will make it much more difficult for independent filmmakers’ work to qualify for the Best Documentary Feature Award, while giving an advantage to films distributed by large studios. Fewer controversial films will qualify for Academy consideration, and my film Iraq in Fragments would have been disqualified this year. This announcement came as a great disappointment to me and to other documentary filmmakers. I hope the Academy will reconsider its decision.
On a final note, I would like to point out that there was no mention of the Iraq War during the Oscar telecast, though it was on the minds of many in the theatre and of millions of viewers. It is wonderful to see the Academy support the protection of the environment. Unfortunately there is more than just one inconvenient truth in this world. Having mention of the Iraq War avoided altogether was a painful reminder for many of us that our country is living in a state of denial. As filmmakers, it is the greatest professional crime we can commit not to speak out with the truth. We owe it to the public.
I hope what I have said is taken to heart. It comes from my concern for the cinematic art and its crucial role in the times we’re living in.
Academy Award Nominee, Iraq In Fragments
Co-Founder, Northwest Documentary Association
It was weird that Iraq and Afghanistan weren’t mentioned at all – not even a shout out to the troops who might be watching (do they really watch this shit? Doesn’t it come on in the middle of the morning or something over there, when they should be getting ready to invade Iran?). And while I can see where John is coming from with labeling the documentaries ‘incredibly depressing’ – well, man up, dude. Let’s be honest here – most of the people in the audience will never see any of the five films nominated, no matter how much Seinfeld gushed about them. More than normal will see An Inconvenient Truth, due to the fact that it won the award and that it’s just the center of so much cultural buzz, but the vast majority of viewers will not seek out Iraq in Fragments. The ones who will were going to do so before Seinfeld ever took the stage. The truth is that for most documentaries just getting nominated is a Godsend, as it increases their profile beyond anything the distributor could have otherwise hoped for.
On the other hand, he’s got a great point about the new regulations for documentaries – it seems like the Academy is making it harder for films to get nominated, and leaving out almost all of the smaller films. I suspect that this is because the dependents – the fake indie arms of the major studios – don’t want to be in competition with more hard hitting docs when they’ve got penguins and shit to parade onscreen.
John isn’t the only person mad at Jerry; Gene Oliver, of the RKO ALLRED5 movie theater in Pryor, Oklahoma is pissed off about Jerry’s "What’s the deal with popcorn?" routine and wrote an angry letter to Nikki Finke.