CLASH OF THE TITANS (REVIEW)

This should have been better. 

Clash of the Titans is a perfect film to remake: it’s got awesome, memorable moments, a great title, and it’s not that good of a film. The movie’s charm lies in the Ray Harryhausen effects, but everything in between those scenes is boring and lifeless. I grew up worshipping the film, but as an adult I understand that it’s a movie that can only be improved upon. But the new Clash falls prey to exactly what makes the original so flawed: whenever there isn’t a monster on screen the film’s a snore, or worse, laughable. It seems like director Louis Leterrier realized this and cut the hell out of his movie, leaving us with a film that has no room to breathe and that just careens from monster scene to monster scene.

And that’s the best part of the movie. The new Clash of the Titans feels like a botched adaptation of a really cool novel: in the movie mankind, sick of the whims of the gods, has declared literal war upon them. Like as in bringing armies to Mount Olympus to kick some ass. This is obviously an unwise move, but it’s also kind of awesome, and it gives the entire film a bizarrely secular humanist bent. I’ve always like the Greek gods because they’re so human – they make the whims and vagaries of fate more understandable. After all, when your top god is a guy whose main hobby is raping while in the forms of animals, the misery in the world around you makes more sense. It’s harder to understand why the loving Judeo-Christian God, who leaves all the raping to his priests, inflicts so many horrors on his flock. And the idea that these personal Greek gods finally push humanity too far is great, and a great starting point for the journey of Perseus, himself a demigod and the offspring of Rapey Zeus.

All of these ideas are neat, but few of them live on screen. We’re told about them, and Perseus’ personal journey is about reconciling the god and the man within him, but it all feels like window dressing. There are other excellent conceptual things going on, including a revolutionary religious leader in the city of Argos – doomed to be destroyed by the Kraken unless Perseus can take matters into his own hands – but they never get dealt with properly.

Which is probably a blessing, since the film’s first third, which is all set-up, is a chore. Director Louis Leterrier seems unable to create a reality in the beginning; everything feels silly and goofy. That will probably work with kids who are today the age I was when I enjoyed the goofiness and pomposity of Clash of the Titans, but as a grown-up moviegoer I just couldn’t deal with Pete Postlethwaite as Doomed Expositional Dad with a straight face. There are other characters set up in the most perfunctory way possible – I’m not even remotely clear on the names of anyone who isn’t a direct lift from the original movie – but again, Leterrier can’t give his actors a reality in which to play their early scenes. I’m not saying the film needed to create a ‘realistic’ Ancient Greece – the film is set in a total alternative Mythosverse, which is cool by me – but because no one can find the emotional grounding for their characters I was never able to give a shit about any of them. Or figure out who they were as various monsters dispatched them.

Once Perseus and his merry band of cannon fodder set off the film picks up simply because Leterrier knows how to stage action scenes. Aftere Perseus meets the new film’s version of Calibos things get off and running and there’s a fairly enjoyable hour of going from set piece to set piece; it’s only when the action takes a break and Perseus and new character Io, played by Gemma Arterton, have a heart to heart that you remember how goofy so much of this is. In terms of generic monster action, Clash of the Titans delivers, but this is a movie that introduces a really cool looking Arab guy made totally of wood and then gives him almost no other defining characteristic or personality trait (or even a name outside of the credits, as far as I could tell). This version of Clash of the Titans feels like it was structured to be more of a men on a mission movie – the cannon fodder actually looks different enough that it’s plausible they could have once also been defined in the script – but the film’s mad rush to get to Medusa’s lair means that everyone who isn’t Perseus is cast aside.

The character who is most hurt by this is Io; a much hotter version of Burgess Meredith, Io is a woman who has been cursed with immortality and who has been watching Perseus his whole life, thinking he could be the key to taking down the gods. But Io is so disconnected from the main narrative that it feels like she was CGIed in later; she doesn’t seem to be traveling with the group but she’s always around when needed. She also delivers silly pep talks every now and again, and she and Perseus seem to have the hots for each other*, but she’s so outside the story that I kept waiting for the revelation that only Perseus could see her. 

Sam Worthington is fine in the role of Perseus, although I think ten years from now his grossly anachronistic buzz cut is going to be the big joke about this movie. I like that Worthington is willing to make all kinds of whiny noises when Perseus gets hurt or is in trouble, and he doesn’t play the character with the cardboard intensity of Marcus from Terminator Salvation, as I feared. There are a couple of moments where Worthington allows his scowl to fall away and he smiles and you can see a sparkle in his eye that I wish he had brought more often. In those moments you can feel the charisma that got him roles like this, and that he has completely hidden away in his American work. 

As for the rest of the cast: Mads Mikkelsen makes a good show of it. I like the conflict between his character and Perseus; Mikkelsen wants Perseus to dig deep into his godhood, while antigodist Perseus just wants to do it all as a man. Mikkelsen has a force of personality that blows through the screen, and often eclipses Worthington. There’s a hint of a great rivalry turned mentorship here, but the film doesn’t linger enough to let this blossom into anything. Everybody else is sort of just there, getting killed by CGI monsters and all that jazz. 

Then there’s the gods. I hope they got paid well. Ralph Fiennes is warming up for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, while Liam Neeson is happily settling into the corny phase of his career (see the upcoming The A-Team for more of that phase). The only other god who even gets a name put to a face is Apollo, but he’s in it for like a moment. The Mount Olympus stuff is so odd that I actually wish more time was spent there. The script, by Travis Beacham and Phil Hay & Matt Manfredi, adds interesting wrinkles to the behind the scenes machinations of the gods, and they set up a larger story that could be followed up in sequels. But the gods stuff gets kind of shortchanged, and we’re left with very strange cheeseball theatrics and glowiness. That said, Leterrier actually manages to make the Olympus stuff feel more real than any moment in the city of Argos; his heightened take works better in that realm.


Finally it must all come down to the real stars of any movie called Clash of the Titans – the monsters. They acquit themselves pretty well here, with the giant scorpion scene having the most Harryhausenian vibe to me, complete with animated guys riding on their backs trying to kill them by stabbing between their plates of armor. I like this new version of the Kraken if only because he fucks things up immediately, as opposed to the very polite and sticking to the ocean version in the original movie. This Kraken, and the scene featuring Perseus’ attempt to destroy him, feels incredibly epic in scope and is a lot of fun. Medusa doesn’t fare as well; I always thought that she could have been improved from the original, in terms of personality, and making her almost completely (sometimes seemingly unfinished) CGI doesn’t help matters. 

The heroic beasts get short shrift. Bubo is the butt of an early joke, and Pegasus is but a plot point. I loved the look of the heroic Djinn, Sheikh Suleiman, but wish he had been given something to do in the picture. He’s practical, as are the Stygian Witches and Charon, the Boat Man of the River Styx. Calibos is practical as well, and I like the conceptual idea behind his rejiggered origin and the way he’s used in the film, but the actual implementation leaves much to be desired. The practical effects are all terrific, and even much of the CGI is acceptable for what it is. 

I didn’t hate Clash of the Titans, but I find it difficult to defend. There are so many missed opportunities that it’s hard not to be disappointed. The script opens up some original and fun ideas that never get followed up on, and too many characters are left undefined and uninteresting. At this point I don’t know what to make of Louis Leterrier; I like his The Incredible Hulk better than this, but all of the flaws in that film are in Clash of the Titans, magnified a hundredfold. I think he’s a terrific action director, but once the movie turns to the characters he loses his way, sometimes fatally. There’s a romantic scene between Io and Perseus in the hold of Charon’s ship that’s simply a joke.

The version of Clash I saw was the converted 3D release, and I thought the 3D was terrible. The movie should be seen in only 2D. I think Clash will be a film I enjoy on Blu-Ray, and I’m sure I’ll watch it more often then the very slow original. Still, I wanted to walk out of the theater excited about the possibilities of future adventures of Perseus, and instead I walked out wishing this adventure had lived up to its full potential.

6 out of 10

* this really bugged me for one simple plot reason: if Perseus isn’t in love with Andromeda, the princess who will be sacrificed to satiate the Kraken so it doesn’t destroy Argos, why bother going on the mission to kill the Kraken in the first place? Perseus has more of a Death Wish story here – Hades killed his family and he wants vengeance – but the quest he undertakes is essentially suicidal. He could have definitely figured out a better way to get revenge, especially since the quest to kill the Kraken is undertaken under a very heavy time constraint. I hate to drag in stuff from interviews or set visits into reviews, but while on the Clash set Arterton told us that Io and Perseus had a brother/sister relationship, which is definitely not the case in the final movie. Unless the brother and sister in question are Angelina Jolie and James Haven Voight.







Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

DVD RACK: HELLHOUNDS


BUY FROM AMAZON: CLICK HERE!                                          

STUDIO: Rhi Entertainment
MSRP: $14.49
RATED: Unrated
RUNNING TIME: 87 minutes
SPECIAL FEATURES:
Trailers

The Pitch
This Sci-Fi (oh, excuse me, “SYFY”) Channel Original finally delivers the ‘Man on a Mission’ film Tarintino teased but never made good on with Basterds, by following Greek warrior
Kleitos as he leads an expedition into the Underwold in an effort to save the recently deceased Demetria from becoming Hades’ love slave. Ricky Schroder from Silver Spoons directs the whole damn thing.

The Humans
Ben Cross, Adam Butcher, Scott Elrod, J.A Woods. Directed by Ricky Schroder


The Nutshell
“After his bride is poisoned at their wedding, a young Greek warrior risks a journey to Hades to rescue her from the God of the Underworld and bring her back to life. What he doesn’t know is that
the best friend who accompanies him is the man who killed her in a jealous rage.”



SPOILER ALERT: This dude gets shot in the neck with an arrow.


The Lowdown
These SyFy Channel movies are in a lot of ways the modern day equivalent of the old Corman flicks. Churned out with expert speed and proficiency by industry newcomers (with a “name” or two thrown in when applicable) working on the cheap. RHI’s Canadian based Maneater series are no exception. So how high of a standard do you hold to a made for tv movie whose sole purpose is two fill two hours of programming during a Sunday afternoon? Thankfully, having sat through my fair share of this crap hungover on the couch, I feel fairly well qualified to say this one ain’t as bad as it could be.

 
Choosing to root itself in the world of “Intro to Western Humanities” Greek Mythology, the plot of Hellhounds moves along fairly quickly as Kleitos and his band of merry men traverse the Underworld in an attempt to find and bring his new bride home. The writers are smart enough to keep things moving along at a brisk pace, pausing only for the occasional commercial break. The film is also devoid of comic relief, sparing us the excruciating agony of poor jokes that fall flat.
 
And what of the titular Hellhounds? Thankfully they’re used few and far between. While the practical FX are fairly decent, the CGI is horrible. The design is even horrible, as it’s hard to tell the Hellhound or how many
of them there actually are. It would’ve worked better if they gave them
each distinct personalities or looks, like The Gremlins or something.
You know, one could have a mohawk. One could be the “urban” hellhound.
Instead, they all look the same and spend most of their time off camera.
apart



Schroder shows Cameron who’s boss in a bit of Avatar/Hellhoud slash fic.

 
Overall Schroder (channeling more Ron Howard in Grand Theft Auto than Clooney in Confessions of a Dangerous Mind) does a pretty solid job behind the camera. You figure spending all those years on sets had to amount for something. Actually some of the smaller Man vs Man fight sequences aren’t half bad as Schroder is able to go handheld and convey a great sense of movement and action with only a few scarcely trained actors. It also stands to mention that while the CGI is horrible, most of the practical effects are pretty tight. They get away with a bit more gore than you’d expect by using black blood, and it’s actually kind of refreshing to see the casting of actual cripples as people missing appendages instead of taking normal folks and photoshopping off their limbs. As any horror fan worth their salt knows a handful of really decent practical effects can make up for a entire made-for-tv’s movie worth of shitty CGI.
 
The third act of the film takes the Hellhounds out of Hell and back into what passed for civilization back then, in a move that recalls the last twenty minutes of Jurassic Park 2. Only shooting during the daytime brings even more attention to the horrendous CGI. And then, after awhile, the movie’s over. And it’s time to move on…

The Package
The disc has the square root of dick in the special features department, which is a little disappointing as a commentary track from Schroder might have been kinda cool. There are, however, 3 trailers from upcoming “Maneater” releases, with Sand Serpents (US military in Iraq vs Giant Sand Worms) showing the most promise.


Big tall mcfisty punch.

4.0 out of 10





Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

SPOILER: MAJOR REVELATION IN NEW IRON MAN 2 PHOTO!

Mickey Rourke wields a cockatoo in this movie. I bet that the actor
demanded it himself.

I imagine the bird hung the guys in the background.

See more scintillating Iron Man 2 photos at Yahoo.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

J. EDGAR DICAPRIO

I like Leonardo DiCaprio often enough in movies, so why is it that half the time when he attaches himself to a project my first thought is ‘Not right for him?’ You’d think he would have overcome whatever weird biases I have at this point, but he hasn’t.

The latest film that gets a ‘Not right for him’ response from me is Clint Eastwood’s upcoming J. Edgar Hoover biopic. Somehow I just don’t see Leo as the head of the FBI, and that’s not even a visual thing – although visually Leo seems all wrong (I did, however, long ago learn to just chill about actors ‘looking like’ characters. Who gives a shit? Unless you’re casting Jackie Chan as George Washington it’s rarely that big of a deal). There’s just something not right about Leo’s energy when it comes to the Hoover that I know (third hand through books and movies). And that’s taking into account that this movie, written by Milk writer Dustin Lance Black, drops all the crossdressing stuff.

Normally I’d shrug it off, but I don’t really trust Eastwood’s instincts anymore, even though the movie itself – which focuses on the early days of the FBI – sounds intriguing. Then again, I’m not Eastwood’s target audience, as I’m not a member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

via Deadline






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

PRIVATE FARIS?

Looks like Anna Faris is heading to the Army.  According to THR.com, the actress is having a Private Benjamin remake tailored as a starring vehicle for her by New Line:  Benjamin starred Goldie Hawn in a star-making turn as a spoiled woman
who joins the Army after her husband dies during sex on their wedding
night. One of the top-grossing movies of that year,
Benjamin was
hailed for tackling women’s issues and earned three Oscar noms — for
Hawn, supporting actress Eileen Brennan and original screenplay (Nancy
Meyers, Charles Shyer and Harvey Miller).

The article also mentions that this go-round will be contemporary and center more on the fish-out-of-water concept rather than making the film political, and not making light of current service men and women.  Amy Talkington (pending Valley Girl remake) is in discussions to write the script, with Mark Gordon producing.  No director is assigned as of yet.  Meanwhile, Faris , who was most recently hard in Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel, has Yogi Bear and What’s Your Number? upcoming.

On a side note, I wonder if Kate Hudson (who is three years younger than Faris, incidentally), is screaming at her agent right now.


Enlist on the message boards.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

DVD REVIEW: I HATE VALENTINE'S DAY


BUY IT FROM AMAZON: Standard Here, Blu-Ray Here
STUDIO: IFC Films
MSRP: $19.98
RUNNING TIME: 89 Minutes
SPECIAL FEATURES:

– Commentary with writer/director/star Nia Vardalos and producers Jason Schuman and William Sherak
– Theatrical trailer

The Pitch
My Big Fat Greek Wedding duo Nia Vardalos and John Corbett reunite! Just what we’ve all been waiting for.

The Humans
Cast: Nia Vardalos, John Corbett, Rachel Dratch, Judah Friedlander. Writer/Director: Nia Vardalos

The Nutshell
Genevieve (Nia Vardalos) is a relationship guru who has a philosophy to keep the romance alive in her relationships– only go on 5 dates and move on before the spark fades. But her philosophy is put to the test when she begins to fall for local restauranter, Greg (John Corbett).

The Lowdown
It’s been 8 years since My Big Fat Greek Wedding came out and I’m still trying to figure out how it became the box office juggernaut it did. It was a middle-of-the-road romantic comedy that was broad and stupid but entertaining enough that I don’t recall hating myself too much after watching it. It was the perfect movie for your parents to go see, and apparently everyone’s parents did just that. Nia Vardalos’ career since then has proven just what a fluke that film was, as she’s been in (and often written) critical and box office failures ever since. Vardalos adds “director” to her list of credits with I Hate Valentine’s Day, a film so inept and poorly made on every level that it’s a wonder anyone involved still has a career.


How are you supposed to know it’s a comedy if there aren’t wacky faces?

Why can’t the creative teams behind modern romantic comedies accurately portray relationships? It shouldn’t be hard. It’s reasonable to believe that everyone involved has been in a relationship with another human being and know what it’s like to interact with said human. But movies like I Hate Valentine’s Day make me wonder if once you start making movies you forget what basic human interaction is like. Vardalos plays the type of character that only exists in movies– a florist who gives advice on relationships to everyone she knows but has some crazy personal philosophy that keeps her from ever getting close to a man… and then she meets the man of her dreams and doesn’t know what to do. The problem with a movie like this is that there’s no reason why these two people shouldn’t be together. They like each other, they should be together, philosophy be damned. But because it’s a movie, that can’t happen. A bunch of phony roadblocks are put in their way to keep the two apart until the last couple of minutes. We’ve seen it all before, only handled infinitely better.


Half of the budget went to surgically altering Nia Vardalos’ face so she could maintain this maniacal grin for the entire movie.

The biggest problem with the film is that the main character is almost certifiably insane. The first 45 minutes of the movie consists of her walking around with a terrifyingly giant smile on her face, spouting her unrealistic advice to everyone. Once her and Corbett’s characters start dating, she dictates what’s supposed to happen on every date and is generally insufferable. When they are kept apart for stupid reasons she breaks down and becomes the type of person who hates romance and won’t shut up about it. Character growth! I think Vardalos and company think that her character’s behavior in the first half of the movie is a sort of self-deception and we’re supposed to know she’ll find herself eventually. The only problem is she behaves this way for so long, and Vardalos portrays her as such a shrill psycho, that she’s just intensely unlikeable instead of flawed. They even throw in some daddy issues to try to add some dimension to the character but it’s all in vain.


Genevieve’s friends and family adopted the wrong tone for her intervention.

One of the other major flaws is the film is incompetently directed by first-timer Vardalos. The whole thing looks flat and too bright half the time and 2 person scenes are shot in medium close-ups of each person, so it never feels like two people are actually conversing. I understand that it was a low budget film with a first time director but, at times, the eyelines don’t match up and it appears that Vardalos is looking over Corbett’s head. That’s just unacceptable. I Hate Valentine’s Day is a misfire in every department and even by today’s rom-com standards, it fails. Which is really saying something.


There’s never an 85-year-old man in a Lincoln Continental when you need one.

The Package
The DVD comes with a trailer and a commentary by Vardalos and two producers. The commentary actually helps illuminate why the film is so horrible. The producers came to Vardalos with the title and she wrote a script around it. They were only able to secure financing with Vardalos and Corbett starring and couldn’t find a director, which forced their leading lady to step behind the camera. This goes to show how NOT to make a movie, because the film feels as half-assed as a movie that was developed from only a title should. There’s plenty of other tid-bits that help explain why the movie is so bad and it’s actually much more entertaining than the movie itself but that should not, by any means, be taken as a recommendation to come anywhere near this DVD.

2.0 out of 10     

   






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

CHECK THIS NOW: ROBERT KURTZMAN CREATURE CORPS DESIGNS

We like to occasionally give a shout out to people whose mission is
to bring to life the twisted shit we see in movies, our nightmares or Tea Party gatherings.  One of those guys is Robert
Kurtzman, of Creature Corps Designs: 

Robert Kurtzman’s Creature Corps. successfully launched its new costume line and original twisted creations at this year’s National Haunters Convention in St. Louis. Their booth was a smash hit attracting thousands of haunters and and Halloween enthusiasts from around the world.
 


“The buzz around our creations has been amazing! People are really talking on the forums about us and how much they dig our work. We had an amazing time at the con and met lots of great vendors and twisted talented artists. It was such a blast being around all the macabre happenings going on and seeing all the different horror creations,” says Kurtzman.



 

Creature Corps is the FX division of Robert’s Precinct 13 Entertainment.  In addition to designing fantastic creations for the Haunters industry, the Creature Corps Team is currently busy creating FX the upcoming Bollywood superhero film RA-One starring India Superstar Shahrukh Khan, as well as the horror projects Jinn from director Ajmal Ahmad and Sucker with director Michael Mansasseri.


You can also see their effects in the soon to be released action/thriller Deadly Impact starring Sean Patrick Flanery and Joe Pantoliano out on DVD April 20th from Fox/MGM. Directed by Robert Kurtzman

 
You can check out the new line of creations at creaturecorps.net





Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

CAN YOU STOMACH THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE?

Likely, you’re not ready. I witnessed The Human Centipede last week at a critic’s screening and was amused to see many folks in the audiences making disgusted sounds, turning their heads any which way in order to miss what was happening on screen. But they always looked back…
The film is of course about a mad German surgeon named Dr. Josef Heiter who happens upon a duo of pretty American girls whose car broke down nearby. Dr. Heiter realizes that they might be the key to his next experiment. See, the good doc’s an internationally-respected surgeon, known for his work splitting Siamese twins, but now he wants to do the exact opposite and create his own monstrosities. He’s performed his experiment and managed to link dogs before but now human test subjects have fallen into his lap…

IFC has picked up The Human Centipede for release and just sent us this first poster, which I’m glad kept the “100% Medically Accurate” tagline.

Now you should head over to Arrow in the Head, where they’re exclusively debuted some concept art from the film. The good doctor actually shows some of this to his patients as he demonstrates his plans in one of the more twisted scenes in the film. It’s surprisingly not quite as disgusting as you might think but it’s got
tension up the wazoo- really a treat for horror fans.

The Human Centipede hits theaters April 30th. Bring your friends.





Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

TRAILER FOR THE GUYS WHO GET INVITED TO PARTIES BUT DON'T SHOW UP AND IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER

Yahoo! Movies has the new Expendables trailer up.  The film opens August 13th.

Aww yeah…






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

THE DEVIN'S ADVOCATE: THE DEATH OF 3D PART II

A couple of weeks back I wrote an Advocate where I talked about the coming storm for 3D: a flood of post-production conversion movies. These films were shot in 2D and made 3D through technological gimmickry in post; it’s cheaper and easier to do this, on average, than to actually do the work required to shoot in 3D. It’s still exceptionally expensive, especially when done on the quick, but it’s so much easier than asking directors to learn to shoot in new ways. And, should the 3D boom bust (as it will), not shooting in 3D means a studio isn’t stuck with a stereoscopic boondoggle.

Since I wrote that first Advocate, things have changed, and they’ve changed in ways that prove my beliefs. First, 3D ticket prices were jacked way up. Second, I saw the post-converted Clash of the  Titans in 3D.

Prices rose this past weekend, buoying the box office takes of How to Train Your Dragon and Alice in Wonderland. 3D screens were always more expensive (a reality that Avatar boosters don’t like looking at when confronted with the idea that the movie’s record-breaking total should have an asterisk next to it), but they got pricier by up to 3 bucks. It’s a simple price gouge – exhibitors saw that people were willing to pay more for a 3D ticket and now they’re seeing how much more they’ll pay. My local theater’s Digital 3D screening of How to Train Your Dragon is a 15 dollar ticket; it’s even pricier to see it in IMAX.

Fifteen bucks is a lot of money. If you don’t live in a major market your ticket price is probably lower (and if you live in New York it’s probably higher), but the point remains that a 3D movie costs more than a 2D movie – by quite a bit. By an amount that really adds up when you’re bringing your family of four to the theater. By an amount that’s noticeable, and that’s going to have people looking at their 3D movies with a critical eye.

Not that critical of an eye. The fact that Alice in Wonderland – a film that is rancid as both cinema and as a 3D experience – is doing so well proves that the general movie audience remains as easily duped as ever. The quality of the film has never mattered much to the general audience, something anyone who watches box office learned long ago. But the quality of the 3D will begin mattering to them very soon.

Maybe as soon as next week. While I thought Alice in Wonderland had simply wretched, barely-there 3D, Clash of the Titans manages to top that with 3D that swings wildly from barely there (taking your glasses off during the film resulted in only a slightly fuzzy – but much brighter – image) to atrociously rendered. Post-conversion creates pop-up book 3D, where everything is  a flat plane that is separated from other flat planes, offering illusory depth, but Clash takes that to the next level. Some characters, apparently in an attempt to give their forms depth, exist on multiple planes – sometimes the front of Zeus’ head appears to be three feet before the back of his head. Director Louis Leterrier flew all over the world to get impressive backgrounds for the epic, but in post-converted 3D many of these landscapes are ruined, with the planes being all over the place. In other scenes where the camera moves around a foreground object the object itself seems to be morphing as the planes are shifted to maintain a 3D image.

It’s a goddamn disaster, frankly. I keep talking to people who simply took their glasses off for most of the movie – while the image was fuzzy it wasn’t as bad as it looked through the glasses, which made the entire film look like it was shot through the dusty rear windshield of a Dodge Dart left in a garage for six years. I’m almost hesitant to review the film because I can’t tell which of my problems with it stem from the movie and which stem from being irritated by the presentation the entire time.

But once people drop 15 bucks to see Clash of the Titans in 3D they’re going to begin wondering why they’re throwing away good money when it’s playing in 2D for five fewer dollars in the theater next door. In a lot of ways the hike in prices and the rush to post-convert – expect a dozen such films this year – are creating a perfect storm of self-destruction for the exhibitors and the studios alike. I think the studios could get away with shitty post-conversion if ticket prices remained reasonable, and I think exhibitors could get away with a price hike if every movie used 3D like Avatar, Coraline or How to Train Your Dragon. But when you put the two together it’s a mess waiting to happen.

I won’t be sorry to see 3D sunk by the greed and stupidity of Hollywood; I think it’s a gimmick and even when used well isn’t that interesting beyond the most base spectacle level. I will say that Clash of the Titans is the first 3D movie I’ve seen where I want to see it at home, in 2D, because I’d like to give the film a second chance without the wounds Warner Bros has inflicted upon it.

In the meantime, keep an eye out for general audience dissatisfaction in the coming months. Over the last three decades Hollywood has learned the trick of getting these people into theaters on opening weekend; I think they’ve finally overextended themselves and will find that their old marketing gags won’t work anymore come 2012.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email