DVD REVIEW: BRIDGE, THE

The Bridge

BUY IT AT AMAZON: CLICK HERE!
STUDIO: Koch-Lorber Films
MSRP: $26.98
RATED: R
RUNNING TIME: 94 Minutes
SPECIAL FEATURES:
Behind-the-scenes featurette
PSA from the National Suicide Prevention Lifeilne

The Pitch

"Ever
had a really bad day? I mean a really
bad day? Probably not this bad."

The Humans

The sort
of men and women who usually end up nameless to everyone but those who loved
them, given a strength of memory by director Eric Steel.

The Nutshell

San Francisco‘s Golden Gate Bridge hosts the world’s largest volume
of suicides per year. For one of those years, Eric Steel and his crew set up
their cameras, trained them on the bridge, and caught several suicides and
attempted suicides. The filmmakers then set up interviews with the surviving
family and friends to create final portraits of the men and women who took
their lives into their own hands and smashed them.

The Lowdown

This is
something of a perfect storm review for me. I have to disclose first thing that
I became deeply emotional during this film, with good reason. I suffer from a
clinically-diagnosed depression, for which I take medication and undergo
therapy. I’m far from unique in my condition, but I wanted to make clear that
Steel’s mature and guileless exploration of suicide hit me on the experiential
level, which could very well color my opinion of the film. I have a tendency to
fawn over any fiction or nonfiction that presents such mental illnesses as a
disease rather than a scene.

I also
made the mistake of viewing The Bridge on a day in between meds.

It would
be easy, then, for me to ascribe a great weight to Steel’s film. I won’t,
deliberately, because this is a documentary completely unconcerned with
assuming such importance. It’s a film almost without thesis, without
communicated concern beyond filling its frames with raw humanity. There’s no
interference by the filmmakers. Those who loved the suicides, after their own
fashion, speak their candid, baffled, broken stories. And, in a decision sure
to raise a dissonant note of ethical concern, there is no interaction with the
suicides themselves (barring the one failed attempt) apart from observing their
bodies and distant, blurry faces tumbling from the rails.

As a film
concerned with the distances that stretch between people, The Bridge does two
things remarkably well: Displaying the humanity of its interview subjects, and
ascribing humanity to the suicides. The skill necessary to create a texture of acceptance,
denial, anger, and more out of brief interviews with people of no special
import can’t be overlooked. In the interview segments, Steel and his crew
capture a startling amount of insight into the lives of the survivors and, one
step removed, into those of the suicides. The editing deserves a lot of the
credit, here. The different subjects are balanced throughout the film, picking
up with one of the suicides, intercutting with another, concluding the first
and moving to a third; it’s a complicated layering of individuals, and it works
wonders. While some of those individuals reach no greater insight than that
their suicide is in a better place, the creation of context within the film lends
even those small clichés an air of wisdom, as one part of a larger
understanding.

I was
consistently spellbound by Steel’s ability to penetrate the emotions of his
subjects, but even moreso by what is built out of the suicides themselves. We
get to see them wandering back and forth on the bridge. They lean over the
railings; they wave aside concerned passers-by; they prepare; they lose their
courage. They jump. These sequences look like the sort of things you’d find
drifting through the seas of viral videos online, but when watching The
Bridge
you feel no cheap thrill. Your heart picks up, but it’s out of
sympathy for the human being, out of recognition of the strange, contorted
logic that has rewired their brains.

You know
that feeling where you want to scream at a fictional character to do something
differently? This time, Lancelot, don’t fail your king. This time, Hamlet,
don’t listen to your uncle. I predict you will never feel that moreso than when
one of Steel’s subjects vaults the railing, pauses for half a second, then
shoves clear.

By
imbuing such a spirit of humanity in these subjects, Steel has done something that
I think is both quiet and important. Suicide, as an extension of depression or
other mental illnesses, isn’t well understood by society at large. It’s an
anomaly, usually attributed to selfishness, when a motivator can be attached at
all. Here, Steel has done the best thing he can to communicate to a wide
audience: he has put human faces on a complicated subject. We can relate to
real humans, and Steel portrays them well, the living and the dead.

As an
educational tool, it’s also worth noting that the one surviving suicide attempt
is given extensive coverage in the latter third of the film, and has a lot to
share about the specifics of bipolar disorder. "Bipolar" is one of
those buzzwords , one of the chic diagnoses going around these days, but here
you’ll find a succinct example of how it affects a life and how it can be
contained.

I’m
finding that the other notes I’ve taken on this film all relate to me,
personally, and aren’t really suited for this review. This film has been on my
mind for a solid week, now, as I’ve dug for the words to give it proper
consideration. I will be encouraging as many people as I can to watch this, as
an example of how compelling nonfiction can be, and how such minimal strokes
can be used to illuminate a cloudy subject.

The Package

There’s
nothing much to accompany the film, apart from a behind-the-scenes featurette
and a public service announcement from the National Suicide Prevention
Lifeline.

9 out of 10






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

MEGAN FOX TRANSFORMS INTO A NEW YORKER

 Because it stars Simon Pegg, we’ve been following the casting news for How To Lose Friends And Alienate People pretty closely. In addition to Pegg, Jeff Bridges, Kirsten Dunst, Gillian Anderson and Danny Huston are all on board the Robert B. Weide-directed adaptation of Toby Young’s memoir about being a total loser with an English accent working a short stint at Vanity Fair.

Now the Auto-hott Megan Fox has joined the cast, reportedly as a young actress…er, starlet, getting her first experience in the big time. Judging from her performance in Transformers, she’s perfectly suited for the role, which will likely involve standing around at parties looking incredibly hot. That’s it. I got nothing else. Look at the picture, alright?






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

OWEN, GIAMATTI AND BELLUCCI SEEN SHOOTING

 Shoot ‘Em Up is one of those movies that sounds like pure DTV material: the film, from the writer of Double Dragon who also happens to be the director of Monster Man, is about "a mysterious loner who teams up with an unlikely ally to protect a newborn baby from a determined criminal who hunts them throughout the bowels of the city."

But. Since the loner is Clive Owen, the ally Monica Bellucci and the criminal Paul Giamatti, you know you’re going to see this. With those three (Monica Bellucci’s assets and whichever male star you like) it could be Super Mario Brothers Meets Rain Man and you’d see it. Actually, you could probably call it Children of Men 2 without much of a strech.

Latino Review exclusively has the first three teaser character posters. Personally, all testosterone aside, I think the Giamatti image is the best. But I could tell you that the images cause cancer of the duodenum and you’d still click through to see the full size Bellucci image, I’m sure, so just click here and do it.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

WILL PERFORM SUPERHEROICS FOR FOOD

http://chud.com/nextraimages/supermancrisis.jpgFor most actors the dilemma about taking a superhero franchise role is whether or not that part will typecast them forever. Brandon Routh, meanwhile, is just worried about get cast – the guy’s career has been suspiciously quiet ever since Superman Returns came out. It’s been a year since that movie was released and he’s done nothing except for a part in the ensemble film Life Is Hot in Cracktown. And with The Man of Steel starting – if it does – next year, Routh still has nothing else big coming up.

So it’s no surprise that when IESB caught up with Routh they found him very, very anxious to get back into his blue and red tights. The guy has a rent to pay, after all, and valet parking isn’t the lucrative career some of you might think. And when asked whether he would be interested in playing Superman in a Justice League movie he said – and hold on for this stunner – that he’d love to be in it. And that he’d be excited to play Superman opposite Christian Bale’s Batman. Bale was too busy working in movies to comment.

In the end Routh knows nothing more about Justice League than we do, and possibly less than some journalists, to be frank. There was talk of a Superman curse, but who knew that this time it would kill a man’s career?






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

DVD REVIEW: BREACH

http://chud.com/nextraimages/breachcover.jpgBUY IT AT AMAZON: CLICK HERE!
STUDIO: Danger After Dark
MSRP: $24.98
RATED:
Unrated
RUNNING TIME: 83 Minutes
SPECIAL FEATURES:

  • English Subtitles
  • Photo Gallery
  • Trailer

The Pitch

How do you say ‘poop’ in Greek? To Kako.

The Humans

Meletis Georgiadis. Yannis Katsambas. Andreas Kontopoulos. Pepi Moschovakou. Argiris Thanasoulas. Mykeyboardis Takingabeating.


This MAY have been shot on video.

The Nutshell

Greek television finally got Dawn of the Dead and 28 Days Later (which I assume was known as XXVIII Days Later over there*). People who knew how to do special effects were watching and decided to emulate, filmmaking chops be damned. The result is To Kako,
which never would have been released had it not come from Greece. It’s
like when a ballplayer makes it to the major leagues simply because
he’s Australian or something.

"Let’s parade the oddball out, see what happens."


"And the winner, by split decision…"

The Lowdown

"You’ve given us a mouthful of Greek Salad." – Joe Pilato, Day of the Dead

That
line of dialogue literally should have been the first and last time a
zombie film had anything to do with the Greeks. It’s not that the
filmmakers of Evil (To Kako)
are not deserving of the chance to make a zombie film, it’s just that
they don’t deserve to make one. This is a statement I’m ashamed to say
retroactively as a response to the evil that is Evil.

The plot of the movie involves people going batshit and biting the living piss out of each other.
Hirsute male and female zombie sorts shamble about and try to hurt the
innocent, but lo and behold, people are there to kill them in ways that
are inventive if you’ve been in stasis since 1974. I don’t mean to be
rude, but it’s apparent from frame one that this is a movie built
entirely around a few remotely inventive kills and an editing technique
that seems the bastard offspring Run Lola Run and an episode of 24.
Without the savvy. Shot on video, the film features tons of split
screens and fast cuts and it seems as if the goal seems as much to be
as much about unleashing jets of blood in the air (a favorite of To Kako,
I counted at least five lingering shots of torsos shooting little red
bloodfarts) and jagged editing techniques as it is about delivering
horror. Actually, there isn’t much horror. Just people running about,
sitting about, and delivering awkwardly choreographed second death to
non-actors.


Corey won the gold medal in squash.

That’s
really it. A few people in a cave get attacked by a first-person
cameraman and go batshit. People go batshit at supper. People go
batshit at a futbol game. A few boring people (including the Jennifer
Grey of Greece) band together to fight the evil and we as an audience
look at our watch and wait for either the end credits or the merciful
Grim Reaper to take us home. It is a bad movie. A dumb movie. Proof
positive that though every single person on Earth thinks they have the
definitive zombie movie in their head or at least a great contribution
to the genre, more often than not they have Jack Elam at best.

Plus,
the kills are telegraphed. There’s no deftness or creativity to it, and
the praised "last shot" of the film is laughable. It’s not cool or
epic, nor does it hammer home the deep message of the film. It’s a
crappy digital shot on a crappy digital movie that looks like it was
shot using someone’s crappy digital watch and it has the worst kung-fu
since some guy walked around a corner holding kung and collided with a
guy carrying fu.

Fuck Evil. It’s a formula zombie flick. The worst formula ever.


"δίγαμμα δίγαμμα, δίγαμμα Shitstuffs" …………………. "κάππα ήτα ἄλφα!"
"I did what you asked, now please no more To Kako" …… "Can’t afford shoes!"

The Package

"You’ve given us a mouthful of Greek Salad." – Patron of Mellow Mushroom Pizza

There
are thankfully almost no special features on this DVD, a fact I am so
proud of. Typically, no-budget horror flicks that suck the life from a
man have 11 commentary tracks, 9 documentaries, and a photo gallery of
everything everyone did on the set every day. This one just has the
film and some photos and a trailer.

I hate this movie a lot.

2.5 out of 10

* Aware of the difference between Greek and Roman.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

LECTURE: THE MOVIE

http://chud.com/nextraimages/paulgleasonlecture.jpgRobert Redford’s Lions for Lambs (based on a screenplay by Matthew Michael Carnahan) is one of this year’s highly-touted "Let’s Talk About Terrorism" movies. It is a tripartite narrative juxtaposing both political and academic wrangling over the country’s foreign policy against the plight of two Army Rangers who idealistically enlisted after 9/11. As the soldiers fight for their lives in hostile territory, a politician (Tom Cruise) and a reporter (Meryl Streep) fiercely debate American foreign policy while a Poly Sci professor harangues a student eager to drop out of school to join the military.

If this sounds heavy-handed to you, just wait until you watch the trailer – which is one of the worst I’ve ever seen. Though I still have high hopes for Lions for Lambs (Redford’s routinely underrated as a director, Carnahan’s one of the hottest writers in town and the cast is undeniable), I don’t know why anyone would pay to see this movie after hearing brief snatches of moldy arguments* cut to a banally propulsive soundtrack from a random 1990s action movie. If I were Tom Cruise/United Artists, I’d yank this offline immediately and try again. This is the kind of rotten first impression that could completely kill audience interest in your movie.

Lions for Lambs hits theaters on November 9th. The trailer is right here…

Powered by AOL Video

*That much of what is said in this trailer is right doesn’t mean it can’t be written in a manner that isn’t thoroughly cliched.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

GUYS NOT USED UP AFTER ALL

http://chud.com/nextraimages/imfinewithoutyou.gifDid you happen to see that disheveled, pantsless, cake-smeared individual doing the Charleston down Barham this morning? No, no, no… not Tim Conway. The other one who looked a little like Jim Carrey in the middle of a Martin Lawrence-scale meltdown. I’m pretty sure that was actually Jim Carrey.

Kinda embarrassing, no? Perhaps. But if Tim Burton had just abandoned the one promising project I had in development following my ignominious participation in The Movie That Hated Hollywood’s Inbox (leaving me with a lighthearted comedy about a drunk trying to stay sober from the writer of Camp Nowhere), I’d probably skip showering for a few days, decline the comfort and concealment of trousers, roll around in the bakery display case at Albertsons for a few minutes and make like a deranged flapper up and down the path to Alan Horn’s place, too (which, given that murderous incline, would be terrific exercise)!

Is the loss of Burton on Ripley’s Believe It or Not* after the uber-awful Steve Oedekerk inexplicably jumped onboard to rewrite Scott Alexander & Larry Karaszewski worth all that? Taken on its own, no. But when you pile on 20th Century Fox defibrillating Used Guys – which the studio killed a year ago rather than shell out roughly $20 million apiece for the talent troika of Stiller/Carrey/Roach – and factoring you out of the equation in favor of the stupendously affordable Will Arnett… welcome to career free-fall!

If you want to attempt a positive spin on this, Fox is probably retaining Stiller not because Carrey’s washed up, but, rather, because he’s been extremely useful to them in the last year (i.e. A Night at the Museum). Carrey, on the other hand, has only made one film for Fox (Me, Myself & Irene), and that title underperformed for the studio in the summer of 2000. Also significant, Carrey has no real history with Jay Roach, while Stiller definitely does (to the tune of over $800 million worldwide).

But it’s never a good thing when the absence of your $20 million payday gets a troubled project greenlit. While it’s important to note that Used Guys – which, by the way, is a futuristic comedy about two cloned men searching for a male-friendly sanctuary in a matriarchal society – isn’t a go picture yet, the fact that everyone from the studio brass on down decided you were the least essential ingredient to the film’s potential success has to be a major blow to the ego.

Which brings us to this: does Jim Carrey have another career resuscitation in him?

*And that Michel Gondry "in talks" credit at the IMDb is not based in any reality I’m a part of.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

THE DEVIN’S ADVOCATE: THE SLEEPY CRITIC

http://chud.com/nextraimages/sleepy.jpgYesterday I saw Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix at the Warner Bros screening room in midtown Manhattan. It was the first ever New York screening, at 2 in the afternoon, and it was the day after school let out for the summer, so the screening room was packed with kids (all very well-behaved, by the way). I settled into my seat and a fellow critic sat down next to me. I’m not going to reveal the guy’s name here, but he’s well-known and has been in the business a long, long time. We’re also colleagues in a critic group here in New York, and I’ve found him to be a nice enough guy, all things considered and despite his bitchy rep.

So there we are, waiting for the movie to start. The critic in question is doodling on the back of his press notes (there were some kids from a Harry Potter fansite at the screening, and it was obviously their first press screening – one of the kids said he thought the notes were the script. Adorable young whippersnappers!) and then the lights start going down. And within a couple of minutes of the opening of the film, as Harry and Dudley are being attacked by Dementors in suburban England, the critic next to me falls asleep.

He’s not just sleeping, he’s snoring. And he’s not doing that sawing logs kind of snoring, he’s doing a Three Stooges-esque ‘buh buh buh’ with his lips. It’s pretty hilarious, but it gets better. The critic keeps waking up during the course of the film – and not during loud parts – and being startled. He’ll wake up and his arms will jump up into the air, as if to ward off the giant angry gods on the screen. I kept thinking he’d cry out ‘Where am I!??!’ at one point; lord knows I’d sympathize, as there’s nothing more disorienting than an incomplete nap.

The critic kept going in and out for the whole film. He’d write a bit on the back of his notes and then be ‘buh buh buh’ing again a second later. Finally the movie ended and he got up and left the screening. I wish I had asked him the burning question that was on my mind: ‘Are you going to review this film?’ I wasn’t paying attention to him the whole movie, but I got the impression that he slept through a significant portion of the film, and definitely slept through many scenes that would have helped him understand the plot (assuming he hasn’t read the books, and I assume he hasn’t). What kind of a review can he possibly write based on his experience? I’d like to hope that he’ll see the movie again, possibly at the all-media and after downing a quart of Red Bull, but I’m cynical and get the feeling that he won’t.

What would be especially excellent would be if he got his dreams mixed up in his review. ‘The film deals with some adult themes, especially the scene when a spell gone wrong causes Harry’s penis to grow uncontrollably. These scenes reminded me of masturbating furtively in the bathroom as a child; in fact, many of the sets reminded me strongly of my mother’s house.’

I’m not looking to embarrass this guy, especially since he may see the film again before reviewing it. That said, if his review ends up being especially clueless, I’ll be sure to link you to it and out him.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

BIG IRON HEAD

http://chud.com/nextraimages/ironteaser.jpg
Principal photography on Iron Man is finished; I’m kind of excited to see what Paramount is going to bring to Comic Con. I’ve still got my fingers crossed for ‘dude in the Iron Man suit,’ but I’ll settle for neat footage. Meanwhile, we’ve been chastised for not running the news that Hillary Swank is doing a cameo in the movie, but let’s be honest, Hillary Swank is in the Cuba Gooding Jr school of actors who fuck up after Oscar wins. Who cares if she’s doing a cameo in the movie? That scene will likely be the worst in the film, unless she’s playing herself on a date with Tony Stark and she says what a crybaby Chad Lowe is. Then I will give this film a 10/10 score.

Anyway, the next phase of Iron Man has begun, and that phase includes this teaser poster snapped by some foreign dudes at a foreign film site. I can’t seem to get that site to load reliably, so while you should click here to see the picture where it originated, I’ve reproduced the whole image to the right.

Our own Jeremy Smith was on the set of Iron Man, so here’s hoping that Paramount lets him write something up soon. I’m sure you’re going to like what he has to say.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

WES ANDERSON’S INDIAN SUMMER

 If Devin wasn’t moving to L.A. in the next couple of weeks, he might have been able to cover this year’s 45th annual New York Film Festival, in which case he would have been among the first to see Wes Anderson’s new The Darjeeling Limited, which opens the festival on September 28.

As is so often the case with Anderson’s movies, not much is known about Darjeeling, which stars Owen Wilson, Adrien Brody and Jason Schwartzman as three brothers on a journey through India. Anjelica Huston and Natalie Portman are also in the cast, which might also include a cameo by Bill Murray. Or it might not.

Anderson wrote the film with Wilson Schwartzman and Roman Coppola, who hopefully injected a little bit of the Bava love that characterized CQ. NYC Film Fest director Richard "No Relation To Elizabeth" Pena says, "It represents a big step for Wes. I hate to use the word ‘matured,’ but
the humor and whimsy he uses is sharper, better focused and
used more effectively.
"

The film will get a New York release on September 29 courtesy of Fox Searchlight. Now let’s have a trailer. Please?






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email