Toronto International Film Festival: JCVD
- By Matthew Torti
- Published 09/5/2008
Matthew Torti
I fell into the wonderful world of film after watching Tim Burton's "Batman" back in 1989 at the ripe old age of 5. From there, I began writing an assortment of short stories, screenplays and teleplays. I attended York University in Toronto, Canada, graduated from its screenwriting program and have since written a number of spec scripts and am currently working on a pilot for a television series. My opinions of certain films have been known to frustrate many, which is what I love most about film- its ability to create heavy debate.
In this day and age of half-baked heroes, it's good to see a familiar face. The Muscles from Brussels! And who would have thought he was such an acting powerhouse? However, it’s too bad that his latest starring vehicle doesn’t even come close to the level of his acting. It is a testament, though, to his skills as an actor that he can transcend above a lackluster film and prove that his career is far from over.
JCVD is easily one of the most buzzed about films at the festival this year. The industry began to take notice at the Cannes Film Festival film market. From there, it started getting accolades wherever it screened. In Toronto alone, it’s been receiving a number of four and five star reviews.
Needless to say, my anticipation was rising with each review. The trailer captured the spirit of the film perfectly; an off beat character study about a man who was once on top of the world, but has since fallen into obscurity and bad career choices.
Being the first Midnight Madness screening of the festival, the theatre was understandably packed with rabid Jean Claude Van Damme fans. It was a wonderful surprise to see so many JCVD fans out in full force. And while the man himself wasn’t in attendance, he did send along a taped message to the crowd apologizing for his absence, which was a classy touch. To introduce the film, director Mabrouk El Mechri revved up the crowd.
Then the theatre went dark and the curtains rose.
Almost immediately I felt something I hadn’t felt since watching Double Impact and Nowhere to Run as a kid. Pure glee. A larger than life hero kicking ass left, right and center. Take note aspiring action filmmakers: if you want to grab the attention of an audience, open your film with a five minute, single-take action sequence. Admittedly, it was an exhilarating way to re-introduce the audience to Van Damme; it seemed like something we haven’t seen before, but at the same time was very nostalgic.
From there, JCVD jumps right into the plot: Van Damme unwittingly becomes involved in a heist at a Belgian post office. Stripped of the glitz and glamor that movie stars are accustomed to, he is forced to come to terms with the fact that he is essentially a nobody in the grand scheme of things. What’s worse, he can’t be the action hero because this is real life; no prop guns, no choreographed fights.
The film beautifully juxtaposes Van Damme’s anguish as a result of the heist with the anguish of a drawn-out custody battle that may very well be the last roundhouse kick he can take. The filmmakers adequately juggle the different aspects of Van Damme’s dilemma with equal dramatic and comedic panache. But by the third act, when the heist hits a fever pitch, something went wrong and it completely destroyed my enjoyment of the film.
For the first two acts, the comedy and drama were given room to breathe, to compliment each other. By the third act, the filmmakers unsuccessfully combined the genres. It was at that point in which the flaws of the film came to my attention. Aside from Van Damme himself, the characters were weak and uninteresting, the main conflict (the heist) proved to be repetitive and didn’t go anywhere nor develop the characters further. All the while I didn’t feel as if there was a real threat to anyone on screen. And worst of all, I lost any emotional connection with Van Damme that I had developed throughout most of the film. By the end, I felt pity for the man, rather than empathy. Argue all you want, but I doubt the filmmakers want you to feel pity for a character they’ve built up for the past ninety minutes. In this case, it wasn’t Van Damme’s acting that faltered, but rather the story itself.
JCVD had a wonderful concept and executed it well in the beginning. By the end, it started to stumble over its own intelligence and dull, under-developed characters. But, as I’ve said time and time again, the saving grace of the film is Jean Claude Van Damme. Speaking, for the first time on film, in his native tongue (French), Van Damme masterfully becomes a man who is broken and defeated, but maintains a odd quirky behavior which suited him very well. Yes, he’s essentially playing himself, but there is a sense of melancholy in his eyes that one can’t just “phone in”.
Need more proof? There is a four-minute monologue in which Van Damme (talking to the camera amidst a flurry of action surrounding him) pleads with the audience, asking for forgiveness and a second chance, explaining that he is only human. With that in mind, the filmmakers effectively incorporate his foibles into the structure of the film; even going so far as to say that he makes horrendous straight to video pictures in order to pay for child support, schooling and the like. Moments like that made me sit up and pay attention because they were very interesting and very heartfelt.
When JCVD worked, it worked incredibly well. When it stumbled, it really pulled me out of the experience of watching a childhood hero return to the silver screen. Thank goodness Van Damme had the chops to save the film. Wow, I never thought I’d say that in my lifetime.






