<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
				<rss version="2.0">
				  <channel>
						<title><![CDATA[CHUD.com - A Movie Website and SO MUCH MORE. - Blogs]]></title>
						<link>http://chud.com/articles</link>
						<description />
						<language>en-us</language>
						<copyright><![CDATA[http://chud.com/articles]]></copyright>
						<generator>N/A</generator>
						<webMaster>nicknunziata@gmail.com</webMaster>
						<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:48:57 EST</lastBuildDate>
						<ttl>20</ttl>

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[UNCLE TOM&#039;S BLOGGIN: &#039;08 RECAP PODCAST PART 2]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1627/UNCLE-TOM039S-BLOGGIN-03908-RECAP-PODCAST-PART-2.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[Over at my good pal Rick Katschke's website for his podcast Host and Guest, the second part of our look at some of the more interesting movies of '08 is now up and running.&nbsp; Don't miss out on such a valuable opportunity to partake in my intensely nasally voice!<br/><a href="http://hostandguest.blogspot.com/2009/03/host-and-guest-episode-20-tom-fuchs.html"><br/>http://hostandguest.blogspot.com/2009/03/host-and-guest-episode-20-tom-fuchs.html<br/></a><br/>Again, let me know what you think if you listen to it!<br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Tom Fuchs)</author>
					  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1627/UNCLE-TOM039S-BLOGGIN-03908-RECAP-PODCAST-PART-2.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[UNCLE TOM&#039;S BLOGGIN: &#039;08 RECAP PODCAST]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1595/UNCLE-TOM039S-BLOGGIN-03908-RECAP-PODCAST.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[The (temporary?) shutdown of the comments section on the blogs put my synopsis jumble game on the shelf for the time being; probably for the best, as it saved me from a Favreau-in-Swingers style meltdown where I keep posting new entries and nobody responds.&nbsp; But I come back to the CHUDBlogosphere bearing gifts: a podcast!&nbsp; One of my best friends, Rick Katschke has a podcast called Host and Guest where he interviews people in the entertainment field on a pretty frequent basis (some previous guests include Stella, Jimmy Pardo, and the lead member of the Alloy Orchestra) and he was kind enough to bring me on the program for a two-part discussion of some of the more notable films of '08.&nbsp; Part one is now live on his website (<a href="http://hostandguest.blogspot.com/2009/03/host-and-guest-episode-19-tom-fuchs.html">http://hostandguest.typepad.com</a>) and ready for CHUD consumption.&nbsp; Let me know what you think!<br/><br/>Again, the link: <a href="http://hostandguest.blogspot.com/2009/03/host-and-guest-episode-19-tom-fuchs.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">CLICK HERE!!!</span></a><br/><br/>Part two coming soonish.<br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Tom Fuchs)</author>
					  <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1595/UNCLE-TOM039S-BLOGGIN-03908-RECAP-PODCAST.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[SYNOPSIS JUMBLE #2]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1498/SYNOPSIS-JUMBLE-2.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt;">After the rousing response to my initial installment of this game (2 responses, only one of which actually tried to answer) one might think I'd give up in the face of such apathy. But I refuse to kowtow to such ridiculous things as audience interest and actual participants and will continue to play this game in an empty vacuum until people are roused to participate either out of interest in the premise or pity for my grand delusions.&nbsp; So fuck it, here goes:<br/><br/><span style="text-decoration: underline;">LAST INSTALLMENT:</span> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Gun Crazy</span> (<span style="font-style: italic;">1949, Dir. Joseph H. Lewis</span>) - <span style="font-weight: bold;">No correct guesses</span><br/><br/>And now for installment #2:<br/><br/>"London unemployed acerbic elegantly anxiety-ridden frustrations booze offers squalor week realize mistake friendship sorely less-than-hospitable empty superbly hilarious present semi-autobiographical complete uncut."<br/><br/><br/>Good luck!</span><br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Tom Fuchs)</author>
					  <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1498/SYNOPSIS-JUMBLE-2.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[SYNOPSIS JUMBLE #1 (with explanation and introduction)]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1457/SYNOPSIS-JUMBLE-1-with-explanation-and-introduction.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">I know it makes no difference to the majority of CHUD's viewing audience, but I feel rather badly for the, let's say, infrequent updating of my blog.&nbsp; It's my resolution to write more frequently in the new year, and I've concocted a little game to throw up bi-weekly in an effort to grease the wheels, so to speak.&nbsp; The rules are simple: I pick a DVD off of my shelves and then post a mish-mash of words from the back cover synopsis (nothing too easy, you understand: there'll be no "Shaun pub Winchester zombies laughs!" entries at any point*) leaving you the CHUD audience to guess which film they belong to&nbsp;in the comments section below.&nbsp; I have no endgame in sight for the game&nbsp;at this juncture, but there could be a prize in the forseeable future for whoever accumulated the most right answers (first, as is the way of the internet comment hierarchy) through a half-year or something such as that.&nbsp; So, anyways, long-winded explanation out of the way, let's get to entry number one:<br/><br/>"When fancier sees act dead-bang together ultimately run eluding history benchmark ferocious selected forerunner carny arousal foolish unforgiving sights."<br/><br/>Best of luck!<br/><br/><br/><span style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt">*And it should go without saying, but don't try and type these into&nbsp;a search engine to cheat your way to the answer guys. That's dirty pool.</span></font></p>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Tom Fuchs)</author>
					  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1457/SYNOPSIS-JUMBLE-1-with-explanation-and-introduction.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Uncle Tom&#039;s Bloggin: Blog Wars Part Four]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1247/Uncle-Tom039s-Bloggin-Blog-Wars-Part-Four.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">
<p><strong><a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1236/My-Blog-Skip---BLOG-WARS-EPISODE-1-quotTHE-SETUPquot.html">Part 1</a><br/><a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1237/Blog-Wars-Part-2.html">Part 2</a><br/><a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1244/Blog-Wars-Part-3.html">Part 3</a><br/><br/><br/>Previously on Blog Wars:</strong><br/><em><br/>Travolta must speak to Cruise urgently and a phone call won't do. He must stare into his eyes and know the answer to this quandary. As he flies off, in the three or four block distance that there is between their two houses, he contemplates what he will tell his friend. He will park the helicopter on Cruise's lawn, look him straight in the eye and demand to know the truth. And, as he is bringing the helicopter in for a landing, he turns his head to the right and notices that...</em></p>
<p>His passenger&#8217;s side upholstery is covered in the sticky remnants of the <strong><em>Coke Zero</em></strong> he had brought with him for the short trip.</p>
<p>&#8220;Damnit&#8221;, exclaimed Travolta, &#8220;is there any fabric cleaner known to man that could clean such an epic stain?&#8221;</p>
<p>Just then a knock at the helicopter door grabbed his attention revealing a British butler type holding a tin tray covered in an elegant silk napkin standing just outside.&nbsp; Travolta rolled down the helicopter window to hear his reply.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well dear sir&#8221;, uttered the man with thinning hair, an&nbsp;enormous nose, and impeccable enuncation,&nbsp;&#8220;there is&nbsp;<em>one</em> cleaner than can be counted on to do the job.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well spit it out!&#8221;</p>
<p>The waiter unveiled the object hidden beneath the cloth.&nbsp; It was none other than Lysol&#8217;s new and improved Multipurpose Cleaning Solution, now with less Thetans!</p>
<p>&#8220;Whoa now, that doesn&#8217;t look like anything special.&nbsp; Why don&#8217;t you prove it&#8217;s cleaning power, mister fancy pants?&#8221;</p>
<p>The British man sprayed a bit of the solution on the seat, and the image did a time elapsed fade revealing the stain to be completely removed.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, that&#8217;s pretty nice!&nbsp; It looks like this new and improved Lysol Multipurpose Cleaning Solution is the best solution to your biggest cleaning problems.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now Travolta and the British man were standing outside the helicopter, each holding a bottle of the solution up for prominent display.</p>
<p>&#8220;Now I&#8217;m no scientist, but I am a scientologist, and this is the solution if you ever want a stain to be deemed clear!&#8221;</p>
<p>The screen turned to static and the lights in the room popped on revealing an antiseptic white room with only a desk which Curtis was currently situated at and a rear projector showing the imagery on the screen at the front of the room, with a single door for entry and exit at the right.&nbsp; </p>
<p>I could&#8217;ve swore I&#8217;ve seen that butler guy in something before, Curtis thought.&nbsp; An episode of <strong><em>The Big Bang Theory</em></strong>, maybe?&nbsp; Before he was able to continue that train of thought any further, the door swung open and a man in a white labcoat with a clipboard walked in and sat in the chair opposite him at the desk.</p>
<p>&#8220;Now Curtis, you&#8217;ve seen both commercials: the David Cronenberg Miller Lite ad and the Scientology-sponsored Lysol ad.&nbsp; Which would you say would be more exciting to view during the Super Bowl?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, I had problems with both of them to be honest.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Go on.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well the first one didn&#8217;t really do a particularly good job of selling the product really, and the violence wouldn't mesh well with my wife&#8217;s patented Super Bowl taco dip.&nbsp; But on the other hand, the Scientology ad was just overlong and didn&#8217;t really get to the point until the end.&nbsp; And I&#8217;m not sure, but I don&#8217;t think helicopters are supposed to have automatic windows.&nbsp; Plus, the Coke Zero wasn&#8217;t even established earlier.&nbsp; It&#8217;s like the writer pulled that out of his ass or something.&#8221;</p>
<p>The man ticked something off on his clipboard.&nbsp; &#8220;I see.&nbsp; Now, on a scale of four to six, how would you rank the appearance of John Travolta&#8217;s sideburns?&#8221;</p>
<p>Curtis was perplexed.&nbsp; &#8220;Now waitaminute, I just agreed to this survey thing because you guys promised me a free hat, I don&#8217;t know what all this sideburn business is about."</p>
<p>The man in the labcoat laughed ominously.&nbsp; &#8220;Oh, you&#8217;ll get a hat alright.&nbsp; <strong>A HAT MADE OF YOUR OWN FLESH</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Curtis screamed as the man lunged towards his eye with a hypodermic needle, the horrible guttural animal noise reverberating off the perfect white walls of the screening room.&nbsp; However, in space, no one can hear you scream.&nbsp; That&#8217;s right:&nbsp; the screening room was in outer space.</p>
<p align="center"><br/><strong style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">THE END</strong></p>
<p>Todd put down <strong><em>McSweeneys</em></strong> number 58 (subtitled <em>A Heartbreaking Corpse of Staggering Exquisiteness</em>) and could barely hide his disappointment.&nbsp; It started off promisingly enough with Jonathan Safran Foer&#8217;s body horror experiment, and Zadie Smith taking on scientology seemed promising enough, but when Rick Moody added in that unnecessary space twist at the conclusion, it sealed the deal: this was the worst issue of <strong><em>McSweeneys</em></strong> yet.&nbsp; Todd wondered if he could cancel the subscription but still maintain the one had for <strong><em>The Believer</em></strong> when his digital wristwatch started beeping.&nbsp; <em>Oh</em>, he thought, <em>four-thirty</em>.&nbsp; He got up and put two slices of whole wheat bread in the toaster and took out the jar of mayonnaise.&nbsp; Luckily for him, his member had almost on reflex begun to engorge itself&nbsp;as the watch&nbsp;beeped, an almost Pavlovian response.&nbsp; He unscrewed the lid and thrust himself inside with vigor three times and then pulled out.&nbsp; The toast popped out and he placed each slice on the top and underside of his shaft and sighed.&nbsp; On cue, his iPod&nbsp;speaker dock&nbsp;started to play &#8220;Inna Gadda Davita&#8221; and life was good.&nbsp; But then he heard the voice, unmistakable over the music and sticky warmth of the cock sandwich.</p>
<p>&#8220;Todd, what in the fuck are you doing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Todd spun around to face-</p>
<p><strong>TO BE CONTINUED IN BLOG WARS PART FOUR</strong></p></span>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Tom Fuchs)</author>
					  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1247/Uncle-Tom039s-Bloggin-Blog-Wars-Part-Four.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Uncle Tom&#039;s Bloggin&#039;: Atonement for a poor ending]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/69/Uncle-Tom039s-Bloggin039-Atonement-for-a-poor-ending.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[WARNING: If the header of this wasn't a clear enough indicator, this&nbsp;blog will be discussing <strong><em>Atonement</em></strong>, specifically its conclusion.&nbsp; As such, spoilers.&nbsp; Be aware.<br/><br/>Immediately after seeing <strong><em>Atonement</em></strong> in theaters, the emotion that came boiling quickly to the top was anger.&nbsp; Usually, this isn't the case with movies, if something isn't particularly good it's part of the majority of films being made and that's just the truth of the matter.&nbsp; However, I felt that this film squandered all the good will it had built up throughout its running time (I'm on the opposite end of the spectrum from a large contingent of our message board crowd in thinking the period romance story and the performances of&nbsp;McAvoy and&nbsp;Knightley were all more than captivating enough) with a fourth wall reveal and attempt at allowing the&nbsp;Briony character off the hook for her actions in the earlier part of the film.&nbsp; <br/><br/>In particular, the final shots of the film (showing the fictional happy ending between the&nbsp;Knightley and&nbsp;McAvoy characters created in&nbsp;Briony's storytelling) seemed to be trying to suggest that she somehow did in fact atone for her&nbsp;transgressions earlier in life.&nbsp; This triggered a cascade of bullshit alarms in my head and left such a poor taste in my mouth that I felt the entire film tumbled like a house of cards underneath the sheer force of the ending's poor taste.<br/><br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <img title="" height="150" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/47/atonement460.jpg" width="230" align="baseline" border="0"/><br/><br/>With a little time and reflection since having seen it, I get the feeling that the ending isn't atrocious, just poorly managed.&nbsp; Director Joe Wright is clearly a talented man (the tracking shot earlier on is just a bolder example of the man's talent), but I think he attempted cinematic ambiguity that instead comes across as schizophrenia.&nbsp; I don't think we're meant to come to the conclusion that&nbsp;Briony believes she's done right by them with this make-believe happy ending, and little touches like the fact that she hasn't changed her hairstyle since being a child and Vanessa Redgrave's emotionally distant but powerful brief turn as the elder Briony&nbsp;suggests that she's never really come to terms with the event that brought this whole work into existence.&nbsp; <br/><br/>However, the use of a sweeping music cue as she tries to explain herself and ending the movie with a shot of the war-torn lovers together aren't bittersweet or heartbreaking (as I imagine they are meant to be, the sort of&nbsp;sucker-punch that leaves an audience weeping as they shuffle out of the cinema) but instead confusing and grating.&nbsp; A little more subtlety would've gotten across the idea that atonement isn't something that can be earned or achieved, it's almost entirely up to the person who's looking for it, and unfortunately I think that somehow got lost in the translation.&nbsp; So I hope to see the movie again (AMC's Best Picture deal coming up in a few weeks time would seem to be the ideal opportunity), and hopefully be able to look at the film as simply flawed instead of thematically eviscerated.&nbsp; In any case, the film's ending made me think, and I'd like to think it wasn't time poorly spent (although in my time's defense, I've seen <strong><em>The Ex</em></strong>, so it might not be able to discern what is&nbsp;'good&nbsp;usage' at this point).&nbsp;&nbsp; Anybody else with thoughts on the ending?<br/><br/>TF<br/><br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Tom Fuchs)</author>
					  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/69/Uncle-Tom039s-Bloggin039-Atonement-for-a-poor-ending.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Uncle Tom&#039;s Bloggin&#039;: Introductory Remarks]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/43/Uncle-Tom039s-Bloggin039-Introductory-Remarks.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[
<p>It seems that I now have a home to post infinitely more incoherent ramblings than the ones I pass off as DVD reviews for CHUD, which is a nice thing.&nbsp; I've always wanted to keep up and maintain a blog, with the focus probably migrating towards the movies I see for the most part (my grand 2008 goal is to watch 365 movies this year), but I can't see why half-baked theories and links of animals being ridden by smaller-yet animals won't make their way into the party as well.&nbsp; As for author picture and bio info, that will have to wait until I get my home computer back from the computation-box-fixatorium, where the twelve gigs of Mutant X episodes on my hard drive caused some sort of malfunction.&nbsp; But soon I'll be on here on a hopefully semi-frequent basis and perhaps somebody somewhere (or at the very least, me) will get some entertainment out of this.<br/><br/>Back soon,<br/>Tom F.</p>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Tom Fuchs)</author>
					  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/43/Uncle-Tom039s-Bloggin039-Introductory-Remarks.html</guid>
					</item>

				
				  </channel>
				</rss>
			