<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
				<rss version="2.0">
				  <channel>
						<title><![CDATA[CHUD.com - A Movie Website and SO MUCH MORE. - Blogs]]></title>
						<link>http://chud.com/articles</link>
						<description />
						<language>en-us</language>
						<copyright><![CDATA[http://chud.com/articles]]></copyright>
						<generator>N/A</generator>
						<webMaster>nicknunziata@gmail.com</webMaster>
						<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:10:39 EST</lastBuildDate>
						<ttl>20</ttl>

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[200 Words on Singularity]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2143/200-Words-on-Singularity.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">200
Words is a daily burst of ideas, thoughts, or impressions on media,
film, and filmmaking. The goal is nothing more or less than
conversation. </span><br style="font-style: italic;"></div><br/><hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">11/20/09<br/></span></div><br/>In an IBM research center, there sits a supercomputer that was recently benchmarked, computating a simulation of the human visual cortex. This equates to somewhere around 1.5 billion neurons and 9 trillion synapses- more processing power than a cat&#8217;s brain. This feat required an acre-sized data center employing almost 150,000 processors. Consider for a moment, that an acre-sized computer 20 years ago couldn&#8217;t even match the capabilities of an iPhone. We&#8217;re heading somewheres folks.<br/><br/>There is little value I can bring to the singularity conversation in so short a space.&nbsp; What I wanted to mention was that from time to time I like to sit back and appreciate the fact that, without a doubt, we are living in a time that will see as much or more change in the human experience than any other moment in the history of our species.&nbsp; Looking at the almost frighteningly predictable curve on which human communication technology has progressed, it becomes clear we are nearing the asymptotic conclusion of our exponential race towards&#8230; whatever.&nbsp; I&#8217;m not expecting <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Terminator</span> or <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">The Matrix</span>, Bradbury or Asimov. That&#8217;s the delightful thing about real progress- it&#8217;s always unexpected, even when completely inevitable!<br/><br/>Put this in your eyes:<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><object height="364" width="445"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cL9Wu2kWwSY&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&hd=1&border=1"/><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cL9Wu2kWwSY&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&hd=1&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"/></object><br/></div><br/><a href="http://chud.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119890"><br/></a><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="__de__86793024">Where the hell are we heading? Tell me on the MESSAGE BOARDS.</a><br/></div><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2138/200-Words-on-Kip-Thunder.html">Previous</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Next<br/></div><br/>Sources | <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4337190.html?page=1">Super-Computer Article</a><br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2143/200-Words-on-Singularity.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[200 Words on Kip Thunder]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2138/200-Words-on-Kip-Thunder.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">200
Words is a daily burst of ideas, thoughts, or impressions on media,
film, and filmmaking. The goal is nothing more or less than
conversation. </span><br style="font-style: italic;"></div><br/><hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">11/19/09<br/></span></div><br/>The Adventures of Kip Thunder and Jeff represents the most effort I&#8217;ve ever put into&#8230; well, anything really. Originally slated only as a Producer, it was standing in a 20,000 sq&#8217; warehouse surrounded by meager piles of wood and an even flimsier construction plan that I had to step up to fill in gaps that needed to be filled. The film&#8217;s primary production designer had designed lovely sets and a solid approach to building them, but it became clear that none of us had a real clue what we were getting into. <br/><br/>Fortunately I was gifted with ample time (or at least willingness to abandon other pursuits) and years of watching my father be competent at nearly everything.&nbsp; It took some blood, sweat, and tears, but I slowly discovered there had been more osmotic absorption of skills over the years than I&#8217;d realized. In the end we put together a pretty incredible set, I think (for very little $$$). <br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;">What we started with:<br/><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/KipThunder/Bare%20Warehouse.jpg" height="263" width="350" align="Baseline" border="0"/><br/><br/>Completed Engine Room:<br/><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/KipThunder/%E2%80%A2Engine%20Room%20Filming.jpg" height="268" width="400" align="Baseline" border="0"/><br/><br/>The alien "Director" character:<br/><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/KipThunder/%E2%80%A2Alien%20Director.jpg" height="268" width="400" align="Baseline" border="0"/><br/><br/>Some Engine Room detail:<br/><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/KipThunder/%E2%80%A2Wall.jpg" height="268" width="400" align="Baseline" border="0"/><br/><br/>Me. wiring up a fan:<br/><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/KipThunder/Wiring%20up%20a%20fan.jpg" height="268" width="400" align="Baseline" border="0"/><br/><br/>Filming in the Bridge:<br/><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/KipThunder/Cockpit%20Filming.jpg" height="267" width="400" align="Baseline" border="0"/><br/><br/>Bridge detail:<br/><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/KipThunder/Cockpit.jpg" height="267" width="400" align="Baseline" border="0"/><br/><br/>Propaganda poster I made for the Storage Room set:<br/><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/KipThunder/KipThunder_BotPostersmall.jpg" height="402" width="275" align="Baseline" border="0"/><br/><br/>My favorite picture (me playing pilot).<br/></div><span style="font-style: italic;"><br/></span><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/KipThunder/Playing%20Around.jpg" height="267" width="400" align="Baseline" border="0"/></span><br/><br/><br/><a href="http://chud.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119890">Tell me what you think of the set, or my narcissism on the MESSAGE BOARD. I'd like to hear from you</a>.<br/><br/><br/><a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2127/200-Words-on-VIDEODROME.html">Previous</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2143/200-Words-on-Singularity.html">Next</a><br/><span style="font-style: italic;"></span></div><span style="font-style: italic;"></span>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2138/200-Words-on-Kip-Thunder.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[200 Words on VIDEODROME]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2127/200-Words-on-VIDEODROME.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">200 Words is a daily burst of ideas, thoughts, or impressions on media, film, and filmmaking. The goal is nothing more or less than conversation. </span><br style="font-style: italic;"></div><br/><hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">11/18/09</span><br style="font-style: italic;"><br/></div><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Videodrome</span> is a film that is simply crying out for the Internet.&nbsp; Representing the very height of cynicism towards TV, the poetically revolutionary tone is a war-cry against passive consumption. The Internet, for all its faults, is a savior for the active. It is a great step for humanity that such an outlet was created to instantly connect us to each other, democratize media, and wrestle the omniscient eye of Big Brother out of the hands of the powerful and into the pockets of the many. <br/><br/>There is the ever-present feeling in <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Videodrome</span> that we should and will revolt against the corrupting signal of the conglomerate, but the film remains ahead of its time. There is the knowledge that an answer exists, but not what it is. Of course <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Videodrome</span> must be stopped, reversed, and used to kill the originators, but what form will The New Flesh take?&nbsp; Perhaps it will take the form of communication for the masses, independent of a filter. Perhaps it will take the form of media consumption via active search, rather than consumption from a shouting box. 1983 Cronenberg had no way of knowing, but The New Flesh would be all these things and more&#8230;<br/><br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://chud.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119890">Share your thoughts on the Message Board. I want to hear them.<br/></a><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/videodrome-se_shot3l.jpg" height="183" width="325" align="Middle" border="0"/><br/><br/>Previous&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2138/200-Words-on-Kip-Thunder.html">Next</a><br/></div>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2127/200-Words-on-VIDEODROME.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Savannah Film Festival Bumper Contest 2009]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2078/Savannah-Film-Festival-Bumper-Contest-2009.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/sff.jpg" align="Middle" border="0" height="98" width="104"/><br/></div><br/>Hi Folks.<br/><br/>This year the SCAD Film Department has started a contest to search for bumpers for the 2009 Savannah Film Festival. I am part of a group producing one such bumper, and I'm hoping for a little help from the Chewer community.<br/><br/>The Bumper I helped to produce is called Life.Cinema.Now and it was written and directed by the board's own Dr. Hall and produced by myself (we also appear in the bumper). I'm very pleased with how it turned out, and hope you enjoy it. I've embedded it below, or you can <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiQdJuUW1MI">click on this link</a> to see it bigger on YouTube (it was shot beautifully on REDONE, so we'd prefer the latter). <br/><br/><object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MiQdJuUW1MI&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&hd=1"/><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/></object><div style="text-align: center;"><object height="340" width="560"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MiQdJuUW1MI&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"/></object><br/></div><br/>If you enjoyed it, it would be fucking rock'n'roll if you'd stroll on over to the <a href="http://filmfest.scad.edu/student-contest/?n=30&np=4">Bumper Contest Website</a> and find our entry (bottom of the page), and give us a rating/vote. Feel free to peruse the other entries - there are a few good ones. <br/><br/>Thanks everyone,<br/>Renn B.<br/><br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://chud.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119102">MESSAGE BOARD THREAD</a><br/></div>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/2078/Savannah-Film-Festival-Bumper-Contest-2009.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Review: Public Enemies]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1913/Review-Public-Enemies.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<p class="p1">In <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Public Enemies</span>, Michael Mann doesn't really explore
the rock-star John Dillinger, the man that struck a comforting figure
for the suffering masses who regarded him as a heroic American Robin
Hood. He also has little interest in the psychopathic John Dillinger,
whose epic crime spree is as much notable for the lives it claimed as
the banks it conquered. The occasionally vulnerable,
romantic-by-virtue-of-pure-force John Dillinger is also a periphery
element. Surprisingly, Mann doesn't even seem to care much about the
bank-robbing John Dillinger. No, Mann put his detail-obsessed energy
towards the story of a gangster who wanted nothing more than to have a
wild ride before inevitably slamming head-first into the ground; John
Dillinger as meteorite.<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p>

<p class="p1">The jailbreak that opens the movie ends with a man
dragging alongside the car, Mann's camera in Dillinger's distressed
face as his (assumed) pal expires and slides away. Any cosmic body
hurtling towards the earth will constantly lose pieces to the constant
and fiery friction and Dillinger loses his criminal compatriots in a
similar fashion. Nearly every sequence in the movie has him leaving a
few cohorts behind, dead or dying.<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p>

<p class="p1"><span style="color: rgb(153, 204, 0);">"We're having too good a time today. We ain't thinking about
tomorrow," </span>sounds great coming from Dillinger, but even that
declaration twinges with self-deception and desperation. For all the
fun he claims to be having, Depp's Dillinger seems constantly plagued
by the stress and melancholy of his losses. That is not to say that he
is completely dour- he lights up in front of the cameras and delights
in flirting with an attractive hostage. He is certainly infatuated with
Marion Cotillard's Billie, and courts her with a ferocity that very
nearly crosses the line from charismatic to psychopathic. While it is
never a legitimate possibility, Dillinger sees in this woman the only
other other possible source of gravity that could pull him away from
his fiery end. He even makes vague plans to escape the storm he has
created. When we see Dillinger in a theater, hoping he is not spotted
during a newsreel that entreats the audience to literally look to their
right and left for him, it is clear how truly fucked Dillinger is.</p>

<p class="p1"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/public_enemies_depp_poster.jpg" align="Right" border="0" height="296" width="200"/>Unfortunately, this potentially strong theme of tragedy
is lost amidst a blaze of side-characters, undeveloped robbery
sequences, and bizarre technical choices. What should be a story that
piles on the tragedy and the increasing impossibility of Dillinger's
escape, is instead a messy collection of scenes, places, and people
that feel as purposeless as Dillinger himself. The bank robberies feel
abrupt, by-the-book, and inconsequential- even the repeated music cue
gives them an air of redundancy. Only a single moment acknowledges his
Robin Hood approach to bank robbery, when Dillinger tells a man that he
is not after his money, "just the banks." Had a cohort perhaps been
physically taking the man's money, with Dillinger then stopping him,
then there might have been an impact. As is, with the man and the money
unseen before Dillinger's comment, even this moment feels shoehorned
and empty.</p>

<p class="p1">The scenes of Dillinger and company escaping (they do
this a lot) are often the ones with the most spark. Mann is exceedingly
good at filming people shooting guns, building real tension and
excitement in these set pieces. The camera work is looser and dirtier
than is often necessary* but they never go so far as to be incoherent.</p>

<p class="p1">Somehow though, Mann never closes the gap between the set
pieces, the relationships, and the themes in the film. Melvin Purvis,
Hoover, and the FBI are given too much screen time to be mere specters
of danger in the story, but Purvis in particular has nowhere to go.
Bale does an admirable job, even showing seeds of good humor in some
scenes, but that is quickly lost when his agents start getting shot. We
get the idea that there is a struggle for Purvis between the results
Hoover wants and the image Hoover wants, but it is never paid off in
any satisfactory fashion. Instead, like so much else in the film, the
struggle is mostly forgotten as the film breathlessly careens forward.</p>

<p class="p1">The controversial topic surrounding <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Public Enemies</span> is the
use of a digital film camera**. The sharp and immediate*** digitally
captured image does strip away a level of comfort that actors,
filmmakers, and audience are used to. The film is still filled with
traditionally gorgeous shots, but there are numerous moments (seen
mostly during action) where the difference becomes perceptible. Often,
we feel closer to the action, swept up in it. A hundred years of
refinement in camera movement is not easily discarded though, and some
of the more spastically hand-held shots- without the buffer of the more
traditional film appearance- simply look cheap.</p>

<p class="p1"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/public_enemies_poster02.jpg" align="Left" border="0" height="319" width="200"/>These occasional dips in perceived quality would be much
more forgivable- and the digital experiment itself more interesting- if
the film had a solid backbone in its sound design. Instead of a solid
audio platform for the film to stand on though, a piss-poor
amateur-level embarrassment pours weakly from the speakers. Dialogue
often sounds as if it is coming through a wall, or is lost entirely. It
is not difficult to imagine Mann's line of thinking with this decision.
A rough, minimally enhanced audio style to match the similarly
unconventional look of the film makes sense (in theory). The ultimate
fault with this logic is that, while it could be argued that digital
video provides a more realistic (if not better looking) image than
film, unmodified audio does not share the same relationship with
reality that celluloid does. Imperfect audio may be more raw, but it is
also entirely unnatural. The many fine performances in the film are
partially lost, and the the occasional "behind-the-scenes" look of the
film is only exacerbated by a second-hand audio production.</p>

<p class="p1">If <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Public Enemies </span>lacks anything, it is certainly not an
abundance of spectacular acting. Depp is as great as one would expect
and manages, even when the film does not, to manage all of the layers
of Dillinger. Bale is shackled by the necessary and typical seriousness
of his character, but there is dimension amidst the intensity. The
importance of Cotillard's Billie is inconsistent but she manages to
shine even in the small scenes. When given moments of real heft towards
the film's conclusion, she is truly stellar. There are almost too many
great character actors in small parts to list, though Stephen Graham's
Baby Face Nelson was a standout. The wall-to-wall quality of the
performances keeps the film entertaining even at its most unfocused.<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p>



<p class="p1">When such talent is involved in a project, disaster
always brings more satisfying closure than mediocrity.<span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;"> Public Enemies</span>
is not a disaster, it's merely a dissapointment. There is certainly a
universe where <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Public Enemies</span> is a classic gangster film, and the
possibilities of such a film can be seen in what turned out. As it
stands though, we have something between a blurry mess and a decent
crime picture.</p><p style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;" class="p1">6 out of 10</p>

<p class="p1">*There must be 10 cumulative minutes of blurry walls and ceilings in this film, as the camera searches for a subject.</p>

<p class="p1">**That is to say, a noticeable digital film camera. Films
like <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Superbad</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Superman Returns</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Click</span>, and <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Fantastic Four 2</span> were all
filmed with Panavision's Genesis camera, which mimics film closely. The
Sony EX1 and Cine Alta F23, while excellent cameras, do register a
digital look.</p>

<p class="p1">***This is the word Mann has been using to describe it.</p><p style="font-size: 14pt; text-align: center;" class="p1"><a href="http://chud.com/forum/showthread.php?t=117211"><span style="font-weight: bold;">PUBLIC ENEMIES MESSAGE BOARD THREAD</span></a></p><p style="font-size: 14pt; text-align: center;" class="p1"><a href="http://chud.com/forum/showthread.php?t=111434"><span style="font-weight: bold;">BLOG MESSAGE BOARD THREAD</span></a><br/></p><p class="p1"><br/></p>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1913/Review-Public-Enemies.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Chewing Film School #3: Self-Portrait Results]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1546/Chewing-Film-School-3-Self-Portrait-Results.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[If you read <a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1536/Chewing-Film-School-2-Self-Portrait-on-HVX200.html">my previous blog</a>, you'll know I was assigned to create a video self-portrait for my Directing the Narrative class. The blog described my thought process, as well as our actual schedule for shooting. You could get an idea of the set and what we were doing by the pictures, but now I have the finished product!<br/><br/>I haven't found an effective way to host a true HD file yet, and it's been pretty fucking frustrating. I tried YouTube first (naturally), but these days they analyze your film's audio and identifies any songs or licensed music it can find. If it does discover something, it mutes the audio. Fucking weak.<br/><br/>Vimeo is a decent video host, but the file is a 100mbs too big for me to upload without buying a pro account (fuck that). So I've included a Vimeo encode below, but just note that it's not the best quality (I wouldn't full screen it).<br/><br/>Facebook has given me the best results, with the highest quality encoding from my original SD file. I'll include a link to that too, for anyone that could actually use it.<br/><br/>Facebook link:<br/>http://www.new.facebook.com/home.php#/video/video.php?v=546206007017&ref=share<br/><br/>If you have any suggestions or critiques, drop in the thread and let me know!<br/><br/><object height="267" width="400"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2945447&server=vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=00f208&fullscreen=1"/></object><div style="text-align: center;"><object height="267" width="400"><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2945447&server=vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=00f208&fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="267"/></object><br/></div><a href="http://vimeo.com/2945447">Self-Portrait: Renn Brown</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1205742">Renn Brown</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.<br/><br/><br/>Thanks for reading!<br/><br/>rennbrown@gmail.com<br/>twitter: @RennBrown<br/><br/><a style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);" href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1536/Chewing-Film-School-2-Self-Portrait-on-HVX200.html"><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">&lt; Previous Blog</span></a> &nbsp;- &nbsp;<a href="editor.php?name=wysiwyg&refresh=1613684176#"><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Next Blog &gt;</span></a><br/><br/><a style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);" href="../../../forum/showthread.php?t=111434">Discuss This Shit</a><br/><br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1546/Chewing-Film-School-3-Self-Portrait-Results.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Chewing Film School #2: Self-Portrait on HVX200]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1536/Chewing-Film-School-2-Self-Portrait-on-HVX200.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[For the new year, I'm going to be blogging a lot of filmmaking stories. This quarter I'm enrolled in Location Sound, Advanced Post-Production, and Directing the Narrative; all very hands-on, practical classes. This in addition to the 3 senior thesis films and multiple narrative projects that I'm attached to. I'll have a lot of fun pictures and anecdotes, so keep an eye out.<br/><br/>My first assignment for Directing The Narrative was a self-portrait. One of those infuriatingly liberating projects, I was allowed to do anything I wanted to portray myself. It could be abstract, funny, showcase past work, or whatever. As long as I did something I would get an A. <br/><br/>Since I've always done pretty light or humorous stuff, I decided to go the artsy, film schooly, pretentious route this time (had to do it at least once while I'm here!). <br/><br/>I started gathering all of my shit, locked a (damn fine) cinematographer, and visited Goodwills***, all the while trying to figure out all the symbolic type shit I wanted to include. I picked a song... "Capital G" by Nine Inch Nails, to play off of my name (George Reynolds Brown IV). Most of the imagery I was conceiving of fit the tone of the song, and I figured the rhythm would lend itself to interesting cuts. Even more wonderful; the song is about Bush, and we would be presenting this project on the 20th- it was providence.<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;">***While in Goodwill, I found this piece of gold.<br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/Chewing_Film_Schools/IMG_0324.JPG" align="baseline" border="0" height="326" width="500"/><br/></div></div><br/><br/>The night before shooting I got about 3 hours of sleep, and woke up at 8:00am for class. My schedule ran as follows...<br/><br/><span style="font-style: italic;">Location Sound: 8:00am - 10:30am</span><br style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Advanced Post-Production: 11:00am - 1:30am</span><br style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Directing The Narrative: 2:00pm - 4:30pm</span><br style="font-style: italic;"><br style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Equipment Pick-Up: 5:00</span><br style="font-style: italic;"><br style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Pre-Shooting Errands: 5:30 - 7:00</span><br style="font-style: italic;"><br style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Set-Up: 7:00 - 8:00</span><br/><br/>We started rolling somewhere near 8:30pm. My friend was in town till midnight, so we shot a lot of his stuff and got him out of there. My lady was next up on the list (she had filming to do in the morning), and we got all of her stuff shot after midnight-dinner.<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/Chewing_Film_Schools/IMG_0332.JPG" align="baseline" border="0" height="500" width="375"/><br/></div><br/>My cinematographer and I shot the bulk of the piece after Ivey left for home, and we finished up around 7:00am. We napped until 9:30am, returned equipment at 10:00am, and then I went back for Residence Life work.... a long fucking 2 days!<br/><br/>The footage was great, it cut together great, and the presentation went very well. I've got everything finalized for upload to the internet, and my next entry will contain the finished product for all to see. More pictures from the shoot are below, and I'll see you next time.<br/><br style="font-style: italic;"><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">My D.P. Joshua Jones, setting the HVX on the Jib arm.</span><br/></div><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/Chewing_Film_Schools/IMG_0328.JPG" align="baseline" border="0" height="500" width="375"/><br/></div><br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">The floor! (a bitch to clean up)</span><br/></div><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/Chewing_Film_Schools/IMG_0333.JPG" align="baseline" border="0" height="375" width="500"/><br/></div><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">The lady, being pretty for my project.</span><br/></div><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/Chewing_Film_Schools/IMG_0337.JPG" align="baseline" border="0" height="375" width="500"/><br/></div><br/>Thanks for reading!<br/><br/>rennbrown@gmail.com<br/>twitter: @RennBrown<br/><br/><a style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);" href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1493/Gump-Vs-Button.html"><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">&lt; Previous Blog</span></a> &nbsp;- &nbsp;<a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1546/Chewing-Film-School-3-Self-Portrait-Results.html"><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Next Blog &gt;</span></a><br/><br/><a style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);" href="../../../forum/showthread.php?t=111434">Discuss This Shit</a><br/><br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"></span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">BONUS: A Teaser of things near completion:</span><br/></div><span style="background-color: rgb(0, 255, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"><br/></span><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="background-color: rgb(0, 255, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/_DSC0249-79.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="334" width="500"/></span><br/><span style="background-color: rgb(0, 255, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"></span></div><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);"></span><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/_DSC0239-69.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="334" width="500"/></div>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1536/Chewing-Film-School-2-Self-Portrait-on-HVX200.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Gump Vs. Button]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1493/Gump-Vs-Button.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 255, 0);"></span>I enjoyed <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</span> as an experience, but I don't think it's will end up as much of a classic. <a href="http://chud.com/articles/articles/17524/1/REVIEW-THE-CURIOUS-CASE-OF-BENJAMIN-BUTTON/Page1.html">Devin's excellent review</a> covers many of the reasons that the film is a bit passionless, and many more are covered in the <a href="http://chud.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112984&highlight=benjamin+button">Sewer Post-Release Thread</a>. One sticking point that I've heard mentioned by nearly everyone though, is the similarity of the film to<span style="font-weight: bold;"> Forrest Gump</span>, which bugged me particularly as the film progressed. Since the two share a screenwriter, it's quite natural that they would have moments of familiarity, but there were simply so many that it was difficult to not be bothered by them. There is a dangerous line to tread between style and masturbation (Case-in-point: <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Spirit</span>).<br/><br/>I don't want the following list to imply that I think <span style="font-weight: bold;">Benjamin Button </span>is a retread of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gump</span>... it's not. Most of these similarities are hidden or repurposed well enough to not be glaring obvious (save for one). The considerable difference between Zemeckis' schmaltz and Fincher's austerity also masks many of the overlapping elements. At the end of the day this is simply a catalog of observations rather than an indictment. <br/>If you have any thoughts on the comparisons, or think I missed any, let me know on the boards or in the comments!<br/><br style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;"><br style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">The Feather Vs. The (fucking goddamn) Hummingbird</span><br/><br/>I'm going to get the one terrible repeating motif out of the way first. ILM's digital feather floating through the squares of Savannah, GA was less than subtle, but at least it matched the tone of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gump</span>. The Hummingbird that makes a similarly floaty appearance in <span style="font-weight: bold;">Button</span> has no place in a Fincher film, and it sticks out like a sore thumb. As a motif it is weak; it only repeats once and has meaning for only one character. <br/><br/><span style="font-style: italic;">A minor gripe: unlike most of the special FX in<span style="font-weight: bold;"> Ben Button</span>, the hummingbird CGI is going to age quickly and poorly.</span><br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Being a Moron Vs. Aging Backwards</span><br/><br/>Both provide the high-concept backbone of their respective films, and both lead to often maddeningly passive protagonists. Gump had the advantage of shameless nuggets of wisdom to help endear him to his audience. Button has the difficulty of a more austere sort of wisdom that is implied more than demonstrated. While Forrest's slowness "blessed" him with a quaint, simplified, and very digestible view of life, Button borders on cold. Pitt's narration offers little insight and his performance is often hamstrung by it's (admittedly well-done) stoicism. <br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Mama Gump's House Vs. Mama Queenie's House</span><br/><br/>This might be the strongest thematic link between <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gump</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Button</span>: the large, airy, and comforting Southern home. Both are home to transients, whether they be <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gump's</span> travelers or <span style="font-weight: bold;">Button's</span> constant cycle of the elderly. Both environments are presided over by the strong matriarchal mothers, which gives the title characters unique positions in the home. The house in both films provide a dramatic and geographic ground for the characters, and is returned to at important points. The passing of time is always reflected in the changes in the homes. <br/><br style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Jenny Vs. Daisy</span><br/><br/>These two characters fulfill very different roles in their respective films, but the scripts often approach them in&nbsp;similar ways. Jenny and Daisy represent the quests of both Forrest and Benjamin. Jenny is given a great many cute moments with Forrest, so their connection feels established and inevitable even as Jenny goes off to serve as a condescending and vaguely misogynistic counter-culture stand in. Daisy's relationship with Benjamin feels looser, but it is patterned much the same way. Like Jenny, she leaves the narrative for long stretches, becomes a worldly, sexualized woman that can't relate well to our hero, and eventually rejects him outright. Naturally though, they both come to see the inevitability of the relationship and make prodigal returns to the big southern houses. Here the comparison ceases as Daisy continues on in the narrative, rather than dying in a suspiciously judgmental case of AIDS.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Shrimpin' Boat Vs. Tug-Boat</span><br/><br/>Roth's (assumed) personal love for the sea emerges very strongly in both scripts. That Benjamin joins a ship's crew for the hell of it, and Forrest sails out because of a promise creates a strange sort of disconnect from any naval passion though.<br/><br style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Hurricane Carmen Vs. Hurricane Katrina</span><br/><br/>Roth also likes his cataclysmic storms. Lt. Dan and Daisy both get a spiritual cleansing via a Category 5.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Some other interesting ties:</span><br/><br/>Sudden wealth: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Apple Stock Vs. The Button Fortune</span><br style="font-weight: bold;"><br/>Weathered, broken men: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Lt. Dan Vs. Capt. Mike</span><br/><br/>First worldly influence : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Elvis Vs. Ngunda Oti</span> (Both stylish and brief visitors to the home)<br/><br/>Abrupt Post-Sex Female Disappearances: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jenny Vs. Eilzabeth Abbott </span>(Tilda Swinton)<br/><br/>Tragedy that shows those crazy womens the light: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Hippie AIDS Vs. Car to the Dancin' legs</span><br/><br/>Think I'm full of bullshit? Got one of your own? Throw it on the boards or in the comments. Any good ones and I'll add it to the blog with a credit to ya.<br/><br/>Thanks for reading!<br/><br/>rennbrown@gmail.com<br/>twitter: @RennBrown<br/><br/><a style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);" href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1469/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Final-RECAP-amp-Special-Thanks-Part-2-of-2.html"><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">&lt; Previous Blog</span></a> &nbsp;- &nbsp;<a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1536/Chewing-Film-School-2-Self-Portrait-on-HVX200.html"><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Next Blog &gt;</span></a><br/><br/><a style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);" href="../../../forum/showthread.php?t=111434">Discuss This Shit</a><br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">************************</span><br/></div><br style="background-color: rgb(0, 255, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"><span style="background-color: rgb(0, 255, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;">BONUS: Renn's One-Word Movie Review</span><br/><br/><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Good</span> /<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"> Bad</span> / Neutral<br/><br/>December 31st, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Punisher: War Zone</span> - <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Unpretentious </span><br/><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); font-style: italic;"><br/></span><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); text-decoration: underline;">Past One-Word Movie Reviews</span><br/>October 13th, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grand Illusion</span><span style="background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> -</span><span style="background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 255, 0);"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">(the) Former</span><br/>September 30th, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Man With A Movie Camera</span> - <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Hyper-Lumiere</span><br/>September 17th, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Happiness</span> - <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Squalid<br/></span>August 25th, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Starship Troopers</span> - <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Grandiloquent!</span><br/>August 18th, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Inglorious Bastards</span> - <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Carpenter-esque</span><br/>
<span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); font-style: italic;"></span>August 10th, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Mondo Cane</span> - <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Condescending</span><br/>August 8th, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Naked Lunch </span>- <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Neither</span><br/>
July 29th, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Hitcher </span>[1986] - <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Rutger!</span><br/>
<span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); font-style: italic;"></span>July 8th, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Lou Ferrigno's Hercules</span> - <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-style: italic;">Spacey</span> <br/>July 1st, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">WALL-E</span> - <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Tender<br/></span>June 27th, 2008&nbsp; : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Addio Zio Tom (Goodbye Uncle Tom)</span> -<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Evil</span><br/>June 22nd, 2008 : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">You Don't Mess With The Zohan</span> - <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Jocular</span><br/><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-style: italic;"></span>June 17th, 2008&nbsp; : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Happening</span> - <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-style: italic;">Embarrassing</span><br/>June 14th, 2008&nbsp; : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Kung-Fu Panda</span> - <span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-style: italic;">Thin</span><br/>
June 12th, 2008&nbsp; : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Run Lola Run</span> - <span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); font-style: italic;">Reckless</span><br/><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); font-style: italic;"></span>June 9th, 2008&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">Day Watch</span> - <span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); font-style: italic;">Upgrade</span><br/>June 8th, 2008&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : : <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Amateurs</span> - <span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); font-style: italic;">Endearing</span><br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">************************</span><br/></div><br/><br/><br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1493/Gump-Vs-Button.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Savannah Film Festival 2008: Final RECAP &amp; Special Thanks (Part 2 of 2)]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1469/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Final-RECAP-amp-Special-Thanks-Part-2-of-2.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[Okay, time to put a fork in this. I've taken my time getting through these last wrap-ups, but I've gone too long without thanking some people, and it's time to move on to new subjects. <br/><br/>If you care to look through the previous entries, here they are...<br/><br/>Introductions:<br/><a href="../../blogs/1350/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Introduction-Part-I.html">Part One</a> <br/><a href="../../blogs/1355/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Introduction-Part-II.html">Part Two</a><br/><a href="../../blogs/1364/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-My-Picture-with-Brett-Ratner.html">Part Three </a>(Brett Ratner Edition)<br/><br/>Daily Coverage:<br/><a href="../../blogs/1368/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-The-Wrestler-Day-One.html">Day One</a> (The Wrestler)<br/><a href="../../blogs/1379/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Malcolm-McDowell-Day.html">Day Two</a> (Malcolm McDowell Day!)<br/><a href="../../blogs/1403/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Day-Three-Short-Films-A-Go-Go.html">Day Three</a> (Short Films and More!)<br/><br/><a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1441/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Final-RECAP-Part-1-of-2.html">Final RECAP</a> (Part I)<br/><br/>Now for new stuff...<br/><br/>First off, gratitude! If I forget anybody please forgive me and make sure to call me an asshole, next we meet.<br/><br/><span style="font-style: italic;">Danny Filson</span> - Danny gets better and more energetic at hosting the Fest each year, and has certainly become the face of it. While he's always running around the celebrities, he's also pretty down-to-earth with the general festival goers. More than once, Danny lent his ear to me despite being painfully and obviously busy. He's truly indispensable; I don't think the festival could run on the day-to-day without him.<br/><br style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Bobby Zarem</span> - The famed producer and P.R. genius has continually graced our festival with his influence. I'm told that we owe nearly every big name that has passed through the festival to him, and I believe it. Bobby is the silent heart of the festival- his presence seems to pulse at every reception, and shine at every screening (especially when the Award honoree inevitably thanks him for inviting them). My hope and goal for next year's fest is to have a few minutes with Mr. Zarem, to thank him personally.<br/><br/><span style="font-style: italic;">Paula Wallace</span> - Of the two Paula's that have helped give Savannah its recent vitality, one has given us good fried chicken and the other has provided an ever-growing film festival. I'll take the latter any day. The President of our little school is quite a figure among the students, the school, and the town. It is said that the Fest was her brainchild and now, a dozen years later, it brings incomparable prestige to SCAD. I'm proud to be a student of this school, and our festival is a big reason why. Thanks Ms. Paula.<br/><br/><span style="font-style: italic;">Bill Dawers </span>- Bill has been a companion of sorts for my last few festivals, as he typically joins me and some other regulars on the front row for each night's screening. I don't think a film festival screening would feel quite right if I didn't have Bill on my left for an instant critique as the credits rolled. Bill has introduced me to a number of important folks involved in and around the Festival and Savannah, which is helpful to a lowly film student. Bill is a writer for Savannah Now (<a href="http://savannahnow.com/user/103">you can find his columns and blogs here</a>) and may possibly know every person of note in Savannah. The festival experience wouldn't be the same for me without Bill, so many thanks to him. <br/><br/>Finally, there are two people I'm very deeply indebted to, as I would not have been able to attend the Festival in such a capacity without them.<br/><br/>A big thanks to the creator of this very site, <span style="font-style: italic;">Nick Nunziata</span>. His support allowed me to get a hold of a Media Pass for coverage on this blog.&nbsp; CHUD's been a large part of my life for many years, so it feels immensely gratifying to&nbsp; cover my school's wonderful Festival and write about it under a CHUD logo. I'll always be indebted to the site for this.<br/><br/>A mega-huge super thanks to <span style="font-style: italic;">Sunny Nelson</span>, Director of Communications for SCAD. Ms. Nelson's infinite patience, speedy communication, and gracious hospitality made this by and far the best festival I've attended. Sunny answered many of my questions, some at peak points of the festival, with impressive timing, and was an invaluable resource. I hope I have lived up to my end of the bargain with the coverage, and that she'll have me back next year. If that's the case, then I look forward to next October.<br/><br/>Also, many good words for fellow chewer <span style="font-style: italic;">Dr. Hall</span> (he can be found on the CHUD boards, spittin' the wisdom), and director of <span style="font-weight: bold;">The 27 Club</span>, <span style="font-style: italic;">Erica Dunton</span> (see her fucking movie!).<br/><br/>MOVIES!<br/><br/>I want to wrap up some thoughts on just a couple of films.<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;">*********************<br/></div><br/><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">The Burning Plain</span> (dir: Guillermo Arriaga)<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/SavFilmFest08/The_Burning_Plain2.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="500" width="332"/><br/></div><br/>This is the new one from Guillermo Arriaga, writer of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Babel</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada</span>. This (kind of) marks his directorial debut, and I think it was the right way for him to go, creatively. I'm a big fan of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Melquiadas Estrada</span>, but <span style="font-weight: bold;">Babel</span> was not one that impressed me. Arriaga is fond of intricately connected multiple narrative stories, but it's not a schtick that has worked resoundingly well until this film. <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Burning Plain</span> is difficult to talk about without spoiling some basic structural twists, but suffice to say, it's pretty damn interesting. It's not a film that I feel comfortable calling "great," but I do look forward to seeing it again and giving it a proper review.<br/><br/>I've heard that it would be released sometime in January or February, but I can't find much info. I'll be on the look out.<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;">*********************<br/></div><br style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">The Boy in The Striped Pajamas</span> (dir: Mark Herman)<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/SavFilmFest08/The_Boy_in_the_Striped_Pyjamas.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="266" width="400"/><br/></div><br/>I had high hopes for this film once I saw the very promising trailer, but I didn't find this one sticking with me. The craft on display is top-notch, and the acting is without question, but ultimately it has little to offer. When you are dealing with a theme as obvious as "the Holocaust was bad," then you have to bring something new to the table. On this front it is very near success: The movie sets up an exploration of a child losing his innocence and naivete. Unfortunately, it is unable to follow through, being a slave to it's own inevitable plot devices. The movie is definitely worth the experience and is sure to bring a tear, but it isn't getting added to any pantheon lists as far as I can see.<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;">*********************<br/></div><br/><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Slumdog Millionaire</span> (dir: Danny Boyle)<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/SavFilmFest08/Slumdog_Millionaire.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="0" width="0"/><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/SavFilmFest08/Slumdog_Millionaire.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="266" width="400"/><br/></div><br/>I am so immensely happy that this movie seems to be catching on. Our screening back in October was wildly enthusiastic, and I've since waited for the public to embrace it. It's a little edgier and rougher than the small word-of-mouthers of the past (like<span style="font-weight: bold;"> Little Miss Sunshine</span>), but far more rewarding for it. I have no doubt that the love for this movie is going to peak with well-deserved Oscar attention*. DO NOT MISS A CHANCE TO SEE THIS MOVIE.<br/><br/>*The aforementioned Mr. Dawers and I had a discussion about this. Bill seemed skeptical of it's chances. He rightly pointed out the Academy's stubborn dismissal of internationally themed films. My hope is that this continues to catch on in a platforming fashion with the public, to the point that the Academy will have to take attention. It seems as if it is well on its way.<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;">*********************<br/></div><br style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Bottle Shock</span> (dir: Randall Miller)<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/SavFilmFest08/bottleshock_filmstill2-smaller.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="265" width="400"/><br/></div><br/>This ended up being the closer for the fest after <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Soloist</span> was yanked from all of it's upcoming festivals. Many kudos to the organizers that managed to bring in a last-minute new film in it's place. It was very nice to end the fest with something other than a re-showing of an earlier film.<br/><br/>It is unfortunate though, that a festival that began with <a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1368/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-The-Wrestler-Day-One.html">such triumphant beauty</a>, had to be book-ended with <span style="font-weight: bold;">Remember The Titans</span> for wine enthusiasts. <br/><br/>***<br/><br/>Many many thanks to all who read even a single word of my festival coverage, and I hope to give you more in 2009. I have big plans for the next fest (up-to-the-minute coverage, video, and more), so I hope I get a shot at it.<br/><br/><br/>Thanks for reading!<br/><br/><a href="../../../forum/showthread.php?t=111983">Click here to go to the Message Board thread.</a><br/><br/>rennbrown@gmail.com<br/>twitter: RennBrown<br/>www.rennbrown.com<br/><a style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); font-weight: bold;" href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1441/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Final-RECAP-Part-1-of-2.html"><br/><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">&lt; Previous Blog</span></a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> &nbsp;- &nbsp;</span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1493/Gump-Vs-Button.html"><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Next Blog &gt;</span></a><br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1469/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Final-RECAP-amp-Special-Thanks-Part-2-of-2.html</guid>
					</item>

				

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Savannah Film Festival 2008: Final RECAP (Part 1 of 2)]]></title>
					  <link>http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1441/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Final-RECAP-Part-1-of-2.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[While real life (and <a href="https://docs.google.com/View?docID=df8bncsv_2hgb7pvf4&revision=_latest">my History Of Film Final</a>) certainly delayed my Festival wrap-up longer than I would have ever liked, I am certainly not going to let my coverage go un-wrapped-up (goddammit). So here following is a batch of impressions, mini-reviews, and other comments on other things I saw at the 2008 Savannah Film Festival. If you're looking for my biggest highlight however, I will confidently point you <a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1368/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-The-Wrestler-Day-One.html">here, towards my impression of <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Wrestler.</span></a> You can also catch up on previous coverage with the following links:<br/><br/>Introductions:<br/><a href="../../blogs/1350/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Introduction-Part-I.html">Part One</a> <br/><a href="../../blogs/1355/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Introduction-Part-II.html">Part Two</a><br/><a href="../../blogs/1364/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-My-Picture-with-Brett-Ratner.html">Part Three </a>(Brett Ratner Edition)<br/><a href="../../blogs/1368/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-The-Wrestler-Day-One.html"><br/>Day One</a> (The Wrestler)<br/><a href="../../blogs/1379/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Malcolm-McDowell-Day.html">Day Two</a> (Malcolm McDowell Day!)<br/><a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1403/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Day-Three-Short-Films-A-Go-Go.html">Day Three</a> (Short Films and More!)<br/><br/>The second part of this condensed finishing-up of the coverage will follow on Friday.<br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;">*********************<br/><br/></div><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Synecdoche, NY</span> (dir: Charlie Kaufman)<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/Synecdoche_New_York.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="334" width="500"/><br/></div><br/>I've danced around writing something about this film for some time, and I think my waffling shall continue. I have nothing substantive to say about <span style="font-weight: bold;">Synecdoche</span> other than "see it." Your reaction to the film may reveal a lot about your views towards art and artists, I will say that. Even further, I can vaguely say that it may manifest itself positively or negatively or somewhere in between. <br/><br/>If held to some sort of impression or reaction, I would say that Charlie Kaufman has crafted an enjoyably strange tale of an artist that has <span style="font-style: italic;">a lot</span> to say about <span style="font-style: italic;">how little</span> he has to say about life. Visually, it might be the most interesting film released this year. There is no chance however, that the film succeeds in connecting and relating to it's audience as well as say, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Eternal Sunshine</span> (a truly sublime film if you've ever been in a long-term relationship). Bottom line is that you should see this film and take the time to figure out how you feel about it. It will be a rewarding experience. <br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;">*********************</div><br/><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">I've Loved You So Long</span> (dir: Philippe Claudel)<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/SavFilmFest08/Ive_Loved_You_So_Long.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="334" width="500"/><br/></div><br style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;">"This powerful story of familial struggles and redemption follows a
shell-shocked Juliette (Scott-Thomas), who returns to live with he
young sister Lea (Zylberstein) after being banished from the family for
15 years.
An enormous critical and box office success in France, Scott-Thomas'
phenomenal performance has already been singled out by critics for
end-of-year award consideration."
</span>(from IMDB.com)<br/><br/>I've heard Oscar buzz for this film from several places, typically revolving around the performance of Kristin Scott Thomas. I can certainly vouch that the acting in question is superb, as are the performances of every other cast member, without exception. Unfortunately, the movie is rather dreary as it revolves around a character that spends much of the movie working to be as stoic and emotionless as possible. In a transparent attempt to keep interest up, the film arbitrarily withholds information about the protagonist's history and motivation, and reveals them in bits and pieces as the story goes on. Save for some revelations towards the end, none of the information is disclosed in a way that really complements the story. The impressions at this festival were mixed, though there seem to be a sharp gender divide among those who liked it and disliked it, with women tending towards a more favorable reaction.<br/><br/>Any acting accolades this film gets are well deserved, but a thin and plodding story make this rather dry movie difficult to recommend. <br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;">*********************</div><br/><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">DCS RED Workshop</span><br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/SavFilmFest08/redone_3.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="333" width="500"/><br/></div><br/>RED presented a panel at the fest, with two of their cameras working to impress during an overview of the company's line-up and philosophy. While there was some good discussion of workflow and shooting processes, most of the information given out is a bit dusty, <a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/Untitled-10.jpg">considering RED's recent announcement</a>. Two very large Plasma HDTVs were set up with direct feed from the two cameras, and I must say that it was pretty impressive. I'll be producing a RED-shot thesis film early next year, and I'm looking forward to it even more now.<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;">*********************</div><br/><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Recount</span> (dir: Jay Roach)<br/><br/><div style="text-align: center;"><img title="" alt="" src="http://chud.com/articles/content_images/173/SavFilmFest08/Recount.jpg" align="baseline" border="0" height="500" width="332"/><br/></div><br/>Yep, this is the HBO made-for-(it's not)-TV-movie written by Danny Strong, typically of acting fame. <br/><br/>It was a bit odd to see this special, which aired back in May, shown during the festival but I'm glad it was. A pretty thrilling and relatively balanced look at the disastrous 2000 election, it boasts superb performances from Kevin Spacy and Tom Wilkinson (who I am in old-old love with after his turn as Ben Franklin in another HBO production, <span style="font-weight: bold;">John Adams</span>). If you get a chance to check this out, get on it quick.<br/><br/>If I have one criticism of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Recount,</span> it that it's format seems all wrong. Considering HBO's pedigree in regards to mini-series, I can't think of a better format for this story. While this film is very sharply paced and presents a pretty clean narrative, you can tell it's bursting at the seems with more information. The most agonizing thing about the event (as far as I can remember) is how protracted the situation became. For weeks America woke up again and again, each morning wondering if they had a president yet. Had the story been formatted into a mini-series, even of only five or so episodes, that exhausting timeline could have been capitalized on. While the format feels like a missed opportunity, the film that we have is strong and entertaining.<br/><br/>Danny Strong did a Q&A after the showing and it was probably the best of the festival (in competition with both of McDowell's). Strong appeared to be a pretty sharp, funny, and matter-of-fact kinda guy, and it was a blast to listen to him. His script for <span style="font-weight: bold;">Recount </span>was on the top of the Blacklist for 2007 (a good thing), so I have a feeling we'll be seeing more from his pen in the future.<br/><br/>My final entry will be covering <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Burning Plain, The Class, Slumdog Millionaire, The Boy in the Striped Pajams</span>, and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Bottle Shock</span> - so stay tuned!<br/><br/>Thanks for reading!<br/><br/><a href="../../../forum/showthread.php?t=111983">Click here to go to the Message Board thread.</a><br/><br/>rennbrown@gmail.com<br/>twitter: RennBrown<br/>www.rennbrown.com<br/><a style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0); font-weight: bold;" href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1403/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Day-Three-Short-Films-A-Go-Go.html"><br/><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">&lt; Previous Blog</span></a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> &nbsp;- <a href="http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1469/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Final-RECAP-amp-Special-Thanks-Part-2-of-2.html">&nbsp;</a></span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="__de__52849971"><span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 0);">Next Blog &gt;</span></a><br/><br/><br/><br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Renn Brown)</author>
					  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://chud.com/articles/blogs/1441/Savannah-Film-Festival-2008-Final-RECAP-Part-1-of-2.html</guid>
					</item>

				
				  </channel>
				</rss>
			