REVIEW: TWILIGHT SAGA - ECLIPSE
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 06/29/2010
- Reviews
Somehow the Twilight films are getting worse. The more money Summit spends on them, the shittier they become. The first film was bad, but had a ragged charm all its own. The second film, New Moon, was a turgid disaster that finally sputtered out with a complete non-climax. And now the third, Eclipse, is just a tedious slog fit only for the most devoted Twihards. Boring, stupid and utterly squandering the concept of a vampire army fighting werewolves, Eclipse makes New Moon look like a snappy screwball comedy.Eclipse is a movie where people just stand around talking at each other, delivering the plot and the absurdly minimalist character progression in expositiony chunks. Edward and Bella, now looking to get married, have no less than seven hundred ninety two discussions about why Bella becoming a vampire could be a bad idea. There are a scant four hundred sixty eight conversations between Bella and Jacob about how much he loves her, and how she will come to see that she loves him too. And the movie just keeps going like that, a series of stagnant two-handers that feel like your soap opera-addicted Aunt Edna decided to turn her daily stories into Off-Off-Off-Broadway theater. Like Boise, Idaho Off-Broadway theater.
Some people may be fooled into thinking that Eclipse is watchable because of increased production value - the huge fuzzy CGI werewolves look better this time - and because of a handful of flashbacks that almost threaten to add scope to this claustrophobic world made up entirely of self-absorbed bores. But they're wrong. This film is not watchable. It's a mess, a slow and painful mess that is almost like anti-cinema.
I don't even know where to start. The source material, obviously, is awful. The script, once again by Melissa Rosenberg, is faithful to a fault. If Rosenberg were a good writer she would have taken Stephenie Meyer's seemingly endless scenes of idiots talking and reworked them into at least scenes of idiots doing something interesting while talking. Director David Slade is of no help, having seemingly lost the touch that made a previous movie about two people just talking - Hard Candy - so electric. Slade mostly establishes the setting, introduces the characters, has them talk at each other in various close-ups, and then cuts to the next boring scene. He throws in a couple of things here and there - the aforementioned flashbacks to the Pioneer era, the Civil War and some Flapper bullshit - but every dialogue scene feels like he's just biding his time to get to one of the very, very few action scenes.
Slade's exhaustingly mundane direction is in no way helped by the actors. Kristen Stewart stumbles her way through the movie, essaying perhaps the single most despicable female hero in history (seriously, there's a scene at the end on a mountain top where she seems to just be fucking with Edward and Jacob's heads for the hell of it). Robert Pattinson morphs into Luke Perry right before our eyes, but with half the 90210 star's charisma or talent. Pattinson is, to his credit, a touch looser here than in previous film - he seems to have made peace with this bullshit and is trying to keep himself amused. Taylor Lautner, meanwhile, is mostly embarrassing. He comes across like a smart alecky rentboy, all shirtless poses and dense, sub-intellectual eyes. Lautner appears to have bought his own hype and he just keeps acting the shit out of every scene, filling every line reading with pulsating, hammy, unearned intensity. It's almost fascinating watching Lautner and Pattinson square off in a number of scenes, with the vampire essentially reducing his entire performance to shrugs and eyebrows set askew while the werewolf brings the simmering force of a hundred thousand high school Hamlets.
Eclipse basically treads a whole bunch of the same ground we went over in the last terrible movie, except this time Jacob keeps coming across like a rapist in training. There's supposed to be a love triangle between Bella, Edward and Jacob, but there is so little sexual chemistry between Stewart and Lautner that no tension exists at all. You don't have to be spoiled on what's coming next to know that there's not a chance in hell that Bella and Jacob end up together, and as you're sitting through two hours of this shit you wonder why anybody even bothered filming this garbage. It's Foregone Conclusion: The Motion Picture.
There is, in a vague sense, a larger plot to this film. Victoria, the redheaded evil vampire from the previous films (now played by Bryce Dallas Howard) is gathering an army of Newborn vampires to come fuck up Bella and her friends. Meanwhile, the ludicrous looking Volturi, who appear to be a group of tweens with a penchant for LARPing, are kind of hanging around, being all not menacing and stuff. Like New Moon the plot takes a backseat to the terrible writing and hateful characters; the movie occasionally flashes to a soundstage that Slade would really, really like us to believe is Seattle, but the vampire army doesn't really show up until the last few minutes of the movie. There's no tension here either because it quickly becomes obvious that this sorry excuse for a script is going to keep dragging the vampire army story along as long as it can.
The few action scenes rise above the rest of the film to the level of generic. Slade's happy to undercrank and shake the camera and have a whole bunch of almost literally anonymous vampires fight some CGI wolves and our more metaphorically anonymous vampire heroes for five or so minutes. There are a couple of moments here and there, but not enough to rescue the film; the vampires turn to marble or something when they're killed and they can shatter, so you would think a horror guy like Slade would take advantage of the bloodless possibilities for PG-13 mayhem. Spoiler: he doesn't. There are a couple of neato beheadings, but mostly it's just repeated scenes of vampires clotheslining each other (this appears to be the vampire's number one move - running at full speed at one another and then clotheslining each other).
Eclipse is probably going to get a reputation as the subversive film, or the self-aware one - there are a couple of self-referential jokes that characters crack, including Edward asking if Jacob owns a shirt. Most of the laughs remain unintentional, though; I couldn't help but giggle at almost every shot of the Cullen family, who look like nothing so much as a troupe of silent movie actors with their faces slathered in white pancake make-up. Jackson Rathbone remains my favorite; he stares around wide-eyed like a brain-damaged lizard, and this time he becomes severely Southern while recounting his secret origin from the Civil War. Every time that guy pops up on screen I laugh. Peter Facinelli, playing Poppa Cullen with all the gravitas of a mayonaise sandwich, comes in a close second. And you haven't lived until you've watched the incredible, awful, bizarre and retarded 'Jacob needs to snuggle with Bella while Edward watches' scene. I swear the last time I saw this level of ineptness in a major studio release it involved Mark Wahlberg running from the wind (disclosure: I think The Happening is a brilliant piece of bad cinema. I do not feel the same way about Eclipse).
Three films in and I remain baffled by the popularity of this franchise. This story is not good, these characters are flat and dull, the mythology is generic and derivative, the romantic themes are centuries outdated. And that's just the books - the films are possibly even worse, because at least it only took Stephenie Meyers to write a bad book. Eclipse is the result of poor work from many actors, the writer, the director, and the producers. The only people who come out looking good are the below the line employees, as Eclipse is the most polished looking of all the Twilight movies. But you know what they say about polished turds, right? They're still Twilight movies.
2 out of 10
Spread The Word
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by John Dark)
Mate, I would love to buy you a beer (or poison of your choice).
Actually, make that a whole case. :)
Comment #2 (Posted by Anthony Tyler)
Thank you for this. I'd not read the other reviews and frankly don't care much for the idea behind these films (bad books by a horrible writer). Sadly, there seem to be more forty-something "moms" standing in lines...waiting...waiting...to buy tickets. What does that say?
Comment #3 (Posted by Bitemeats)
The ineptness seems to be carrying over to the poster department. Someone has flipped that image so all the facial features are out of whack: a real rookie mistake. The High School Hamlet comment rings most true. This is high school theater on an industrial scale.
Comment #4 (Posted by Swearengen)
"with all the gravitas of a mayonaise sandwich"..................awesome.
Comment #5 (Posted by Helen Gynell)
The sad fact that you are "baffled" and feel that the romantic themes are "centuries outdated" is exactly why the books are popular. While old fashioned romance might baffle today's guy and feel dead, for girls and women it's very much alive and SO wanted and missing that this fantasy has been embraced by females of all ages. Too bad it takes a mating age werewolf and a scent-crazed vampire to make the female lead feel special, but throw in the fact that they're incredibly good looking, totally hang on her every word, and both so madly in love they are ready to fight over her and who cares they're not 'normal'. Obviously normal guys just don't understand women Crave Romance. The popularity of the books and films is undeniable proof that guys are woefully lacking in that department. I'm thinking that girls want to be loved for who they are-Bella's not the cheerleader, not the most popular girl in school, but she's got both of the two hottest guys in town literally at each others' throats. Just be being herself. She didn't have to turn herself into a male-fantasy-jiggling-video vixen to find love! As far as the films go, guys just don't want to see that Lautner and Pattinson are THAT appealing to women-Think of it like young Elvis and James Dean together!
Comment #6 (Posted by Shan)
Sounds hideous.
Comment #7 (Posted by Admiral Adama)
Wow. If only the movie was as entertaining as this review... I've never seen any of this twilight crap, but, seriously, this reviews kinda makes me want to watch it... not!
Comment #8 (Posted by evilkinggumby)
Haha you caved and went to see this... you poor poor bastard. enjoy the hits, but also enjoy the tirade of angry fans begging your slow death.. lol I'll wait and enjoy this movie rifftracked(you should do a follow up review of all prior and pending Twilight films with rifftrack commentaries and see if the movies become watchable.. I think they're awesome)
Comment #9 (Posted by Woodrowgus)
"...all the gravitas of a mayonnaise sandwich." I'm still laughing. Hard.
Comment #10 (Posted by Atomic Ross)
I have to say, the absolute dearth of marketing I've seen for this soon-to-be juggernaut suggests that the studio knows exactly what they have on their hands: a severely polarizing piece of shit, in which everyone already knows what it is, and will either see it regardless or avoid it like syphilis. No need for marketing here. Just take your place in line behind those tweens, pathetic older women, and pathetic gay men.
Comment #11 (Posted by Stephanie)
I will gladly admit that I enjoy watching the first film. I think it has a charm to it that makes it re-watchable. I hated New Moon and wasn't holding out much hope for Eclipse. This review, and another scathing one, have upped my anticipation level. I cannot wait to join forces with my friend and enjoy this train wreck unfold before our eyes. Hopefully the movie provides as many laughs as this review!
Comment #12 (Posted by Rob)
It makes for a witty, snappy review, but this is describing a completely different movie than I saw. "Eclipse" was the first movie in the series I actually liked -- it's hardly 'awesome,' but it's the first of the three that actually felt like a real movie.
Comment #13 (Posted by LD)
...aaaaaand Devin has to go into the Movie Critic Protection program once again. Love the review, as Devin always manages to destroy Twilight in the best ways possible. Cue the Twilight fans to show up to provide massive hits for site and to take the usual shots at Devin's appearance, reviews, and lack of Hot Topic purchases.
Comment #14 (Posted by john)
SHOCKING REVIEW. um, no. not at all. when will you give us some hints on INCEPTION? nobody that reads this site cares about twilight.
Comment #15 (Posted by stephen)
News just in, Devin hates a big summer blockbuster. No one pays any attention and goes to see it anyway....
Details at 10......
Comment #16 (Posted by LJ)
This review makes me so happy.
So happy. There is sanity in the world!!
Comment #17 (Posted by tfulch0807)
Who needs this crap when other franchises promise neck-breaking-bloody-mouth vampire rape. Seriously, what is going to top that?
Comment #18 (Posted by OceanWang)
The poster looks like two metrosexual frat boys who just date rape drugged the shit out of that poor girl.
Comment #19 (Posted by pat from Boston)
"...all the gravitas of a mayonaise sandwich"
Hysterical! Still got it, Devin!
Comment #20 (Posted by youscrazy)
"gravitas of a mayonaise sandwich" that's a good one.
Comment #21 (Posted by oblagon)
"the incredible, awful, bizarre and retarded 'Jacob needs to snuggle with Bella while Edward watches' scene"
Is it anything like the loving peeping Torgo scene from Manos the Hands of Fate?
Comment #22 (Posted by Giraffe)
Shocking. Absolutely shocking.
Comment #23 (Posted by an unknown user)
I'm convinced that before this 'saga' is over, they will release one movie that isn't absolute shite. I mean, with 5 movies...they're bound to make one that is moderately above mediocre, even if purely by accident, right? And 20 years or so from now, when vampires finally start to be cool again, I hope I'm around to see the Twilight remakes.
Comment #24 (Posted by Christian Toto)
Cruel, devastating and very, very funny. Take a bow!
Comment #25 (Posted by Jeff)
Ownage. I think the appeal has nothing to do with the terrible story, writing, characters, etc. It has everything to do with American teenage girls getting their rocks off to legal soft core.
Comment #26 (Posted by MASTERYODA007)
Wow this sounds shit. So no suprise there then.
Comment #27 (Posted by Brennen S)
This review may be in itself one of the best films of the year. It was insightful, it was emotionally resounding, I cried for like 3 minutes after reading it.
Comment #28 (Posted by an unknown user)
why is it pick of the week if it blows so hard?
Comment #29 (Posted by krypto)
"This film is not watchable. It's a mess, a slow and painful mess that is almost like anti-cinema." Now that's a quote to put on the blu-ray box.
Comment #30 (Posted by Seth)
God, I love you so much right now Devin.
Comment #31 (Posted by Sam Worthington's Charm)
The poster is hysterical. They look like they just got detention.
Comment #32 (Posted by gruel)
tots hangin out for this.
Comment #33 (Posted by BKB)
Chances are, my post will be dleted as usual, but you don't get the popularity cause your not a fan of the series.. Plain and simple.. A grade of 2 out of 10 as though this will stop anyone from seeing this and the amount of $$$ it'll make..
Comment #34 (Posted by Vlad the Twinkler)
This definitely has to be my favorite: "...(this appears to be the vampire's number one move - running at full speed at one another and then clotheslining each other). "
Comment #35 (Posted by atal)
A 2/10 but it is "Chud.com Pick of the Week?"
Must be a rough week for cinemas.
Comment #36 (Posted by Devin's Beard)
This sounds like a great movie to get drunk to and mock
Comment #37 (Posted by Steve)
Devin, while I agree with your points on how banal this series is (And always has been), I gotta admit.... Where you lose me is when you start going, "And anybody who disagrees with me is an asshole and a moron!" I admire your convictions, but that doesn't make you the end-all be-all of criticism. You just come off as terribly narcissistic and it sort of hampers your overall review. In my opinion, keep the venom towards the movie (Always amusing to read) but when you start assuming you know whats best for the audience.... Well... The Jehovahs Witnesses that go door to door think they know whats best for us, don't they? Just saying, there's a fine line between critical thought and facsist thinking.
Comment #38 (Posted by mark)
Something that keeps repeating in these reviews is how asinine the characters behave towards one another. What do you expect? These characters were written by a woman who is emotionally and sexually stunted for an audience that is emotionally and sexually immature. That goes double for the 50 year old fans.
Comment #39 (Posted by Laur)
So did you like the movie? "rolls eyes"
Take the Saga for what it is, its not trying to be Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings. We the fans love it and except it for what it is because we love the books and the TALENTED actors who work there asses off. This hate BS from critics is getting old.
Comment #40 (Posted by BStiglets)
<---drinking out of his Burger King Twilight Cup.
Comment #41 (Posted by Cody)
"Take the Saga for what it is". A shitty, shitty set of movies.
Comment #42 (Posted by THE INTERNET)
So, Devin. Did the movie have the part about one of the lame pussy vampires being gang-raped to death and wishing she had babies instead?
Comment #43 (Posted by Kaiju D'amato)
Wickedly funny review... Gotta fly over to AICN now and read Harry's (most likely) positive take...
Comment #44 (Posted by EverKor)
Boy did you nail it! I saw the first two but won't see this one. The first two were my homage to train wrecks. HORRIBLE movies. TERRIBLE acting. I marvel at the popularity of this series just as I marvel at the horror that is Kristen Stewart's acting.
Comment #45 (Posted by Dan V.)
#42: Yes.
Comment #46 (Posted by brundlefly)
Great, great review.
Comment #47 (Posted by M)
you ROCK, this review made my day! I hate it so much that Twilight is worshiped and you entertained me big time with this intelligent, witty review of yours. thank you. like the first commenter here I'd buy you a beer, a regular one this time:)
I agree with every single word in this review
Comment #48 (Posted by Jay)
Hmmmm... From what I hear, it's actually the best film of the three so far (faint praise, I'm sure). I'm not a Twilight fan, but understand why women gravitate to it. Let the ladies enjoy their franchise and step away. If us boys can justify enjoying the Star Wars prequels, then we're on even footing. Think I'm wrong? Just substitute Edward & Bella with Anakin & Padme, and the comparisons are perfect.
Comment #49 (Posted by Shawn)
Fantastically written sir. Good show.
Comment #50 (Posted by Steven)
Your reviews of these movies are the only thing to look forward to when one of them is released. Breaking Dawn is going to be amazing!
Comment #51 (Posted by Lord Enigma)
This is why dudes suck. Seriously, as a guy, the tediousness of Devin's thoughts on Twilight never cease to be anything less than a guy who has no idea why something is big and thus, needs to trash it. Keep on trashing it Devin, keep on lapping it up dudes in this comment section, and keep on ignoring what Helen posted. Seriously, it's a romance. I happen to not be emotionally stunted like many of you in this... Rob excluded... and can enjoy a good romance. I am sorry you cannot but that's what the women love and you guys seem to have no idea how they work.
It's a shame really that men have turned into emtionally stunted shitheads but that's what happens when everything about being a heterosexual male has become about being HARD and BADASS and not exactly intuitive to the opposite sex.
Hate Twilight all you want. I will be there tonight and will enjoy the hilarity that ensues when Taylor Lautner takes off his shirt.
Comment #52 (Posted by Mr DynaMic)
Re: Lautner - his "werewolf brings the simmering force of a hundred thousand high school Hamlets." Gold Jerry, Gold! I'm dying here.
Comment #53 (Posted by mtm1973)
The only "Twilight"-related thing I can bring myself to look at are Devin's reviews.
Devin, I love you for writing these.
Comment #54 (Posted by terri)
Good review. Can never understand the appeal of these movies. They are nether scary or that sexy. Few topless scenes of male actors getting fans all excited. Desperate.
Comment #55 (Posted by Magic Kenny)
"Meanwhile, the ludicrous looking Volturi, who appear to be a group of tweens with a penchant for LARPing, are kind of hanging around, being all not menacing and stuff." The fucking best line you've ever written, Dev.
Comment #56 (Posted by Ben)
I still think it's weird you'd rather watch this instead of reviewing other decent movies that never get a review on this site. One question though: How was Ashley Greene? I didn't see her mentioned AT ALL.
Comment #57 (Posted by LD)
#5 - Ms. Gynell, I'd like to introduce you to my good friend Banky Edwards. I'm certain he knows exactly what you need to get this Twilight crap out of your system.
Comment #58 (Posted by Adam)
Helen Gynell must be at least 44 and a half by reading her comment. First of all this kind of romantic behavior is only craved by girls from guys that look like Pattinson and Lautner, if it were Artie Lange and Devin faraci acting like that ladies would just be creeped out. Also there's nothing special about the two hottest guys in town trying to get with the hottest girl in town and then that girl just cockteasing both of them. it doesn't matter that she's not popular or a cheerleader because neither are jacob and edward but they're both hot and she's hot and none of them are really going up or down the social ladder when they hook up with each other. It also seems like your idea of the male fantasy is pretty outdated.
Comment #59 (Posted by stargazer)
"As far as the films go, guys just don't want to see that Lautner and Pattinson are THAT appealing to women-Think of it like young Elvis and James Dean together!"
Well I'm an adult woman and I don't find these guys appealing at all. I find them boring and bland and forgettable. Also, the comparison with Elvis and James Dean is just SO wrong in so many levels; they wish they had a tenth of their talent and charisma.
Comment #60 (Posted by John)
I guess it's a war between "Twilight" and "The Last Airbender" for the box office. And although I think David Slade is a more consistent director than M. Night Shyamalan, I'm looking forward to whether or not that movie's worth the time. Either that or get a second helping of "Toy Story 3."
Comment #61 (Posted by Towelie McTowel)
It amuses me that the Twathard fans "defend" their series by saying that guys don't understand love or romance; yet they can never comment on the horrible dialogue and awful acting. Anyway, this film will make tons of $$$ because of the ignorant tweens and their horny moms; but that won't change the fact that this series is the cinematic equivalent to syphilis.
Comment #62 (Posted by Amy)
Great review. Lautner's so terrible and is a bore, but he keeps getting incredible hype and lavish praise. Why?
Comment #63 (Posted by Master Vile)
Not even the few plants posting here trying to save face for the film can fully bring themselves to defend it. That says a lot.
Comment #64 (Posted by an unknown user)
I never had any intention of seeing this movie. Having read this review, I feel comfortable with my original instinct, and still have no intention of seeing this movie. However, the existence of this movie has introduced me to the greatness and hilarity of the phrase "all the gravitas of a mayonaise sandwich", and for that I am grateful. Mind you, I once ate a mayonaise sandwich that had been out in the sun for a few hours. That motherfucker had a whole lot of gravitas, which I had the chance to enjoy for many hours afterward.
Comment #65 (Posted by Doug)
The Last Airbender must be fucking horrifically awful if you guys gave the Twitard movie "Pick of the Week" over that.
Comment #66 (Posted by a)
now if only all the men who read this site can admit that Iron Man 2 was just as puerile and ineptly made....
Comment #67 (Posted by Mr. Furious)
"seriously, there's a scene at the end on a mountain top where she seems to just be fucking with Edward and Jacob's heads for the hell of it" Isn't that what all chicks do?
Comment #68 (Posted by brokemypancreaslaughing)
The ONLY reason I watch these is they make me laugh more than LSD did once upon a time.
Comment #69 (Posted by Wolf Boy)
In response to comment #5: James Dean and Elvis had more talent, charm, charisma, and humor in their earwax than Lautner and Pattinson could ever dream of having. Trying to compare them is laughable.
Comment #70 (Posted by monkey from the future that only says ficus)
I love it when women talks about how a real man loves a woman based soley on who she is as a person and in the same breath blathers about how hot these two guys are. Save the bullshit until you have posters on your wall of Phillip Seymore Hoffman and John C. Reilly.
Comment #71 (Posted by kim)
wow people need to get over it!!! if you dont like the books or the story or the writter than dont read it & dont watch the movies!!!! ITs a romantic love story what the hell else do u want??? I luv the way people talk so much shit but if u hate it that much why waste your time talking about it???
Comment #72 (Posted by three pancakes)
because it's everywhere.
Comment #73 (Posted by Tundro)
As men, we're not supposed to "get it".
We're not the target market for this stuff. I, as a film geek who loves shit my wife can't watch, can't begrudge fans of this stuff a little escapist enjoyment - even if I think a 400+ year old vampire is interested in a teenager is creepy - and it shits all over vampire/werewolf lore - and the female role debases women etc - they will always say I have missed the point. Also, a big part of mens hate for this franchise might stem from a feeling of this Meyers woman has somehow invaded a sacred genre by inserting emo angst and dossied up Harlequin novel mentalities into what is essentially a horror genre. I don't like it, but let them have their bottle.
Comment #74 (Posted by an unknown user)
@71: it's devin's job to watch movies. And Twilight is wonderful because it's brought people all across the globe together to hate something with reason.
Comment #75 (Posted by Eric Pfeiffer)
I find it very difficult to believe that a movie based on a series of thinly-veiled abstinence pamphlets written by a devout Mormon would lack gravitas. However, rest assured that years from now when Devin has passed on, a baptism of the dead will be performed on this review score, transforming it from a 2 to a 10.
Comment #76 (Posted by an unknown user)
Nothing says romance like see section by teeth. and a werewolf hooking up with a newborn
Comment #77 (Posted by Achwell Foley)
Comment #39 (Posted by Laur)
"Take the Saga for what it is, its not trying to be Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings."
-----
In other words, it's not any good but you like it anyway. Why should a reliable critic pretend to like something just because the fans do?
Comment #78 (Posted by an unknown user)
not to be rude, because it is an insightful review, but it seems that you really seem to trash this movie because of the fact that you hate the books, which is sort of bias.
Comment #79 (Posted by Max)
First off: Haeckel, I hope you die in a fire, you glitter huffing fuck.
Second: Stop doing this to yourself, Devin. It's really paining me to see you hurt yourself like this.
Comment #80 (Posted by Uth)
I'm so very thankful this series exists so that I might glean the ever elusive insight into the uber-sensitive mind that is woman. Edward & Jacob... show us the way into a fair maidens self absorbed heart by way of brooding, zero personality, and an astounding ineptness in the art of seduction, and conversation.
2/10 sounds awfully generous.
Comment #81 (Posted by Doug)
Having now seen this movie... this review is completely off-base. This is the first Twilight movie that might actually be a decent viewing experience without the irony, thanks to some surprisingly mature character turns, better acting by all three teen leads and action that is actually pretty well-shot. It's also the most vampire-y of these so-called vampire movies. I know it's fun to trash this series, but you gotta detach from what's "fun" and look at genuine quality instead of just writing the insults in your head before you see the movie. The movie is clearly a pretty well-made piece, despite being based on source material that doesn't deserve such a strong treatment.
Comment #82 (Posted by Joe)
I agree couldn't wait for it to end
Comment #83 (Posted by ruserious)
David Slade, you dissapoint me.was he rushed? who knows. But his distinctive style is lost in this movie. ALMOST every shot is a close-up....really?this would have been a good idea shooting on a mini-dv/digital camera but this aint FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS. dont try to make the audience feel a personal connection with these characters. not gonna happen. also, when did EDWARD become human??? his skin color is flesh toned through almost the whole movie. what happened to the pasty white skin???
Comment #84 (Posted by Olumide)
I'm a vampire enthusiast, but I can't bring myself to watch Twilight... It sounds awful, and not one person has been able to tell me what's good about it (and I don't want to hear a word about Rob Pattinson, I'm no homo). The most honest fan I've met said "cute guys showing abs"... Seriously...? I'd never say a film rocks just cos cute chicks got naked in it...!
Comment #85 (Posted by bloatedmoby)
@#5 Read Love in The Time of Cholera, The Feast of Love, The English Patient, The Unbearable Lightness of Being
or see...
Annie Hall, 500 Days of Summer, Before Sunset and Before Sunrise, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Hable Con Ella, Jules and Jim, any James L. Brooks movie...
All of these films and novels are romances, written or created by men. The difference between Twilight and them...is that they're actually good. Hell, even the Time Traveler's Wife is head and shoulders above Twilight. Nicholas Sparks adaptations are better than Twilight.
As for the comment about getting men to admit Iron Man 2 was just a puerile...puerile maybe, but just as much? Not a chance. If we want to talk about simple gender politics, at least the female lead in Iron Man 2 was a capable woman in a position of power, with a personality. In fact, I've seen better written women in a lot of superhero comics than I have in Twilight. That's saying something. If I had a daughter, there's no way I would ever let her go near this shit.
@the post about Phillip Seymour Hoffman and John C. Reilly. Amen. My girlfriend's biggest celebrity crushes are James Gandolfini and Seth Rogen. Every time we have a huge fight, I just keep that in mind, and be thankful that she likes men with real personalities and actually has good taste in cinema.
Comment #86 (Posted by unabridged)
I think I'm about to make a serious marriage proposal here, Devin - you're so awesome in all your awesomeness, can't we be awesome together?! ;)
Comment #87 (Posted by twimannia)
i think the twilight saga is the best movies i had ever seen. ki an going to watvh eclipse again this coming week and i have seen the first two hundreds of times i have even written out the scripts the music and the cast list for the first two i cant wait 4 breaking dawn. i have read all the books thousands of times over and over again i dont read anything else i think the people that dont like it just need to give it a chance. or they are just very crazy and deluded. i think twilight is a realy good movie coz it is very well put together i think anyone that hasnt seen it NEEDS to. I LOVE EDWARD


