EXCLUSIVE: NEW THE WOLFMAN POSTER BY LEGENDARY BASIL GOGOS!
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 01/13/2010
- News
With the rebirth of their great character The Wolfman around the corner, Universal has turned to the legendary Basil Gogos to create a poster of the new version of the decades-old beast. And they couldn't have turned to a better person, as Gogos is best known as the cover artist for Famous Monsters of Filmland whose bold images of the Universal Monsters (and many other beasts and baddies) defined them for an entire generation. Including me.
We're beyond honored to bring you your first look at this new poster for The Wolfman. Click on the image for the higher rez version, and read on for my interview with Gogos himself!

© Basil Gogos, 2010. The artist is represented by and published by Timothy Yarger Fine Art, Beverly Hills, California. www.yargerfineart.com.
How did Universal come to you with this project?
I am with a gallery in LA and they got my name through the gallery since I'm listed as part of the stable. The rest is history. I wanted to work for Universal for quite a while, and when this thing happened it was beautiful.
I'll tell you something about that painting. Paintings may tend to be a problem as you go, but this painting is just about one of the very few that came along and I started to get involved and I finished it with no problems. Smooth as silk.
Do you begin with pencil sketches?
I do a good study with my pencil, then I go into analyzing how I should use it. In my mind's eye I seem to visualize the picture as it would be finished, and strangely enough it is very often exactly as I envisioned it.
I have read that you you got your first assignment for Famous Monsters of Filmland, and you painted it - I believe it was a Vincent Price painting?
The number nine issue, yeah. Vincent Price as Roderick Usher.
I understand that when you painted it the style you used was so bold you weren't sure if they would use it.
The request was that a painting of a psychedelic nature should be created. I, at the time, didn't know which way to go because I had been a realist. I let myself go and decided to paint whatever came to my mind, and not use dyes, and they were fully transparent and it developed itself into an imaginary thing. I love color, and I think in color. So I did that and in four hours it came out like a dream. I presented it - actually, my rep presented it at the time - and I wasn't sure that they were going to like it. Again, I'm a staunch a realist. I found myself doing something totally imaginary and I loved it. Ever since then I go beyond the limits, loving color the way I do and visualizing color the way I do, I let myself go and I do go beyond the lines and that's beautiful.
You started in commercial art but eventually decided that you wanted to wanted to go back to art school and relearn from the ground up.
No, I was not trying to relearn. What I was trying to do was [get rid of] the commercialism. I was turning into an illustrator and I wanted to be a fine artist, and in order to do that I had to cleanse myself of all the commerciality and go into something that would be the fine arts. And it worked. But the only way I could do that would be to go back to school and start at the beginning again, visualizing myself as a fine artist to get the commercialism out of me. It was as simple as that. Of course I got involved with more illustration. I did stumble onto the fine arts, which is great and I think I should have been in the fine arts, but in the end illustration got the best of me and I remain an illustrator - except that once in a while, especially in all these portraits, the fine arts come out.
Looking back at all the covers you did for Famous Monsters is there one that stands out as a favorite?
Yeah, Number 57, which is Karloff when he died. I put a candle behind him. It's a very somber painting, as it should be. I happen to be able to say I own the original, but that's the only original I own from the old days. All my work was scattered, left and right.
Universal is looking to bring back more of their famous monsters, and they have The Creature from the Black Lagoon and Frankenstein in development. Would you be interested in doing work on those films?
I am absolutely delighted and I can't wait until they call me again!
We're beyond honored to bring you your first look at this new poster for The Wolfman. Click on the image for the higher rez version, and read on for my interview with Gogos himself!

© Basil Gogos, 2010. The artist is represented by and published by Timothy Yarger Fine Art, Beverly Hills, California. www.yargerfineart.com.
Since 1960, legendary American illustrator Basil Gogos has painted some of our most iconic images of movie monsters. In the past 50 years, Mr. Gogos has created haunting portraits of such classic Universal creatures as The Creature from the Black Lagoon, Dracula, The Mummy, Frankenstein's monster and The Phantom of the Opera. With this limited-edition work commissioned by Universal for The Wolfman, Mr. Gogos helps Universal bring the myth of a cursed man back to its legendary origins.
Wolfman Full Moon Sweepstakes: Download the The Wolfman Lunar Phases Widget to countdown the days to the full moon and enter the sweepstakes for a chance to win great prizes, including a signed copy of the limited edition Wolfman print by Basil Gogos! Entry deadline is the next full moon (January 30) and you can enter once a day. Click here to enter through the movie's Facebook page.
Wolfman Full Moon Sweepstakes: Download the The Wolfman Lunar Phases Widget to countdown the days to the full moon and enter the sweepstakes for a chance to win great prizes, including a signed copy of the limited edition Wolfman print by Basil Gogos! Entry deadline is the next full moon (January 30) and you can enter once a day. Click here to enter through the movie's Facebook page.
How did Universal come to you with this project?
I am with a gallery in LA and they got my name through the gallery since I'm listed as part of the stable. The rest is history. I wanted to work for Universal for quite a while, and when this thing happened it was beautiful.
I'll tell you something about that painting. Paintings may tend to be a problem as you go, but this painting is just about one of the very few that came along and I started to get involved and I finished it with no problems. Smooth as silk.
Do you begin with pencil sketches?
I do a good study with my pencil, then I go into analyzing how I should use it. In my mind's eye I seem to visualize the picture as it would be finished, and strangely enough it is very often exactly as I envisioned it.
I have read that you you got your first assignment for Famous Monsters of Filmland, and you painted it - I believe it was a Vincent Price painting?
The number nine issue, yeah. Vincent Price as Roderick Usher.
I understand that when you painted it the style you used was so bold you weren't sure if they would use it.
The request was that a painting of a psychedelic nature should be created. I, at the time, didn't know which way to go because I had been a realist. I let myself go and decided to paint whatever came to my mind, and not use dyes, and they were fully transparent and it developed itself into an imaginary thing. I love color, and I think in color. So I did that and in four hours it came out like a dream. I presented it - actually, my rep presented it at the time - and I wasn't sure that they were going to like it. Again, I'm a staunch a realist. I found myself doing something totally imaginary and I loved it. Ever since then I go beyond the limits, loving color the way I do and visualizing color the way I do, I let myself go and I do go beyond the lines and that's beautiful.
You started in commercial art but eventually decided that you wanted to wanted to go back to art school and relearn from the ground up.
No, I was not trying to relearn. What I was trying to do was [get rid of] the commercialism. I was turning into an illustrator and I wanted to be a fine artist, and in order to do that I had to cleanse myself of all the commerciality and go into something that would be the fine arts. And it worked. But the only way I could do that would be to go back to school and start at the beginning again, visualizing myself as a fine artist to get the commercialism out of me. It was as simple as that. Of course I got involved with more illustration. I did stumble onto the fine arts, which is great and I think I should have been in the fine arts, but in the end illustration got the best of me and I remain an illustrator - except that once in a while, especially in all these portraits, the fine arts come out.
Looking back at all the covers you did for Famous Monsters is there one that stands out as a favorite?
Yeah, Number 57, which is Karloff when he died. I put a candle behind him. It's a very somber painting, as it should be. I happen to be able to say I own the original, but that's the only original I own from the old days. All my work was scattered, left and right.
Universal is looking to bring back more of their famous monsters, and they have The Creature from the Black Lagoon and Frankenstein in development. Would you be interested in doing work on those films?
I am absolutely delighted and I can't wait until they call me again!
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by mike o))))
Awesome! Congratulations.
Comment #2 (Posted by teledork)
That painting is absolutely magnificent! Fine arts, indeed...
Comment #3 (Posted by Sammaeal)
Absolultely amazing! I can't think of anyone better to do a Wolfman poster than Basil!
Comment #4 (Posted by Kitkuttaja)
Nice painting and all but there really seems to be something wrong with wolfies mouth...just doesn't look right.
Comment #5 (Posted by Jason Pollock)
Unless, of course, the make-up design features that sort of animalistic, jutting lower jaw. I think it's a really feral-looking creature that way.
Devin - there should be an e-mail address where we can write to Universal and let them know that this kind of artistic take on film advertising is a welcome change from floating heads, and that they should continue to utilize fine artists once again.
Comment #6 (Posted by CHughD)
Goddamn watermark. "Oh, WE got it first, y'all!" Who cares, you're marring a great peice of art with that thing.
Comment #7 (Posted by BusBoy)
Absolutely brilliant. Thanks from this geek to everyone who was behind this. The Painted Movie Poster lives on!
Comment #8 (Posted by ANdyB)
tremendous quality. Great work :)
Comment #9 (Posted by ThinkBaker)
I am a freelance Illustrator, and Basil is one of my biggest heroes. Seeing this image makes me giddy like a little school girl.
I hope this (for my own sake as well) is the re-spawning of the classic ILLUSTRATED film posters! It has always been my dream to be able to say I painted a movie poster and I have always deemed that the "glory days" of the Illustrated film posters were long gone thanks to photoshop.
Huge respect to Universal for recognizing the sole individual who has made their black and white monsters come to life in FULL COLOR!
Congratulations Basil, you deserve every bit of this exposure!
-baker
Comment #10 (Posted by snagglegrass)
Cannot tell you how excited I am over this. Famous Monsters of Filmland (and Gogos' amazing cover portraits) was the first portal to the original Wolf-Man and his kin and kith so long ago, and it's a long overdue tribute to Gogos' work and its relationship with the classic monster movie heritage. Bravo Universal =D
Comment #11 (Posted by Phil Dean)
Tits! I hope this movie ends up being half as good as the hype.
Comment #12 (Posted by Rick)
Man this is great and wow a traditional art movie poster I say bring more on! Basil has always been a favorite of mine and it is so great to see his work out there like this in the 21st century. Here is to more of his work showing up!
Comment #13 (Posted by Simon)
Really?! Am i the only one who thnks it looks like a pile of crap?
Comment #14 (Posted by Mark)
Looks great. I especially like how Gogos got that CHUD logo in there too! Really makes the image!
Comment #15 (Posted by Kevin)
@Simon
No, you're not the only one who thinks that the poster looks not as great as some are making it to be.
Yes, the artist is a legend in the field, but that alone shouldn't grant him a pass. While I think it's great that Universal commissioned this piece, this is far from Mr. Gogos' best work.
Comment #16 (Posted by wow)
Would love to see it laid out as key art - coming from my core seven year old self, movie posters will always have more spinal, visceral power although I am into art
Comment #17 (Posted by jasonatrent)
Hey Mark, it's fun to type on the internets, huh? "Looks 'shopped. I can tell by the superimposed piracy discouraging logo. I've seen quite a few in my time"
Comment #18 (Posted by Gwai Lo)
I think it's gorgeous, but it's definitely a bit messier than some of Gogos' other work. I understand why you put the CHUD watermark on there, but can you like, replace this with a non-watermarked image once this news isn't so newsy? I want the image just not with hideous green eyesore on it.
Comment #19 (Posted by Spheres)
REMOVE THE DAMN WATERMARK!
Comment #20 (Posted by Joe MovieBuff)
Uh, buy the fucking poster maybe? Fingers crossed the movie is at least an interesting/honorable failure. There's a lot of love/respect for subject's history in this movie, in an era where that holds no value for Joe Avatar.
Comment #21 (Posted by Adam)
Mmmm, that's a lot of corporate marketing text. Did Devin even do the interview, or was it handed to him by Universal? It's very bland - reads like something from the press notes. In fact this whole feature stinks of studio damage control, trying to win over the horror fans, with CHUD dutifully helping out.
Comment #22 (Posted by Zorbek)
Is it what you call fine art? Horrible proportions, and just look at the mouth and hand of Wolvie. As for the use of colors that's just ridiculous. Bad art that is. You geeks should go to museums sometimes, check what painting is.
Comment #23 (Posted by Dilly)
Who the fuck are you "Zorbek"? If you're such an expert on fine art you should know about the concept of foreshortening. His hand looks bigger because it's CLOSER to the viewer than his head is, also known as DEPTH. But what do I know, you go to museums so you're probably right.
Comment #24 (Posted by Jeffrey Tinsley)
You know what stinks? You can't enter the sweepstakes unless you sign up for FaceBook, which I refuse to do.
Comment #25 (Posted by Senor Pooglins)
Zorbek, you must not have read the interview, Basil said himself he loves color. If your so "learned" on classical art, then you would recognize the color pallette and obvious chaotic style of the piece are meant to envoke the fear, rage, and overall emotion involved with this particular subject. And by some of you peoples responses, he did a beautiful job. I personally love it, it makes me uneasy to look at, reminds me of something on "Night Gallery".
And for Adam, did you read the same interview I did? I must have missed all the propaganda. Why wouldn't someone who specializes in character art want to work with a studio who holds the rights to some of the most iconic screen monsters?
Comment #26 (Posted by Dave)
Yes the color work is really good. Everything else is not, however. The face is a mess and the hand is...suspiciously poor. Is it attacking, stalking, coming up for air? Its whole posture is obscured by what I guess is fog, thus lending no immediate impression but that some weird thing is in the forground. Is it terrible? No, but it is immensely flawed, and you don't need a great deal of art expertise to see that.
Comment #27 (Posted by Chaney)
It's not "classic" gogos. Little sloppy in my opinion. The mouth is mangled, that white thing on his eye.....just looks like a nice attempt at faking a real gogos painting. Basil can do better
Comment #28 (Posted by ryan)
you must be joking with that huge watermark. jesus chirst.
Comment #29 (Posted by smh)
take that disgustingly large and distracting watermark off this piece of artwork please
Comment #30 (Posted by Forry's Ghost)
No question Gogos helped define Famous Monsters of Filmland back in the day...but I have to agree, this is far from Gogos' best work. It is sloppy, which I suppose we can contribute to BG's age. Aside from the obvious (that has been mentioned), Dilly brings up the subject of foreshortening- which is a major problem with the shoulder/arm/ hand as I see it. There IS no foreshortening here; it is like the hand and lower arm impossibly float in the foreground, compared to the positioning of the head and shoulder. It is nice to see Gogos is still working though, and his imput to the rebirth of Universal's WOLFMAN is an obvious and welcome addition to what will hopefully lead to a new acceptance of the Universal classics by a new generation. Ack Ack!
Comment #31 (Posted by juho siimes)
Absolutely amazing, i'm speechless to explain how awesome that picture is.
Comment #32 (Posted by kathy JaSKULSKI)
Unbelievable awesome!!
Comment #33 (Posted by Edward Perkins)
Once again Basil has hit it out of the park, I don't care what anyone else says, Basil is the best monster artist ever, and this painting is a perfect example of that, I would be proud to own anything he ever did, I wish I could find more gogos site's or purchase some of his work. ps. any ideas were please let me know at fastecp@comcast.net
Comment #34 (Posted by Dwayne Pinkney)
Well, this article left out the two most important details...where does one buy a print, and how much are they?
Comment #35 (Posted by Nick)
These prints are $575.00 contact Timothy Yarger
Comment #36 (Posted by Wolfgirl)
only 100 archival prints are available. Contact Rebecca at Timothy Yarger Fine Art in Beverly Hills for more information. rebecca@yargerfineart.com
Comment #37 (Posted by Chris)
Thanks for ruining it with your god-awful watermark!
Comment #38 (Posted by Inside the Rock Poster)
Just got this in the mail today. I won one signed by Benicio Del Toro and Basil. It is just magnificent.
Comment #39 (Posted by SIMMONS26Margo)
I opine that to receive the <a href="http://bestfinance-blog.com">loan</a> from creditors you should present a great reason. Nevertheless, once I've got a commercial loan, just because I was willing to buy a house.


