SONY PICTURES CLASSICS IS KIND OF FULL OF SHIT
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 01/5/2010
- News
Last week there was a little brouhaha about Sony Pictures Classics not sending out awards consideration screeners of Duncan Jones' excellent scifi film Moon. I didn't run this because a) ehhh, who cares* and b) the reasoning behind the screener snub was obvious - SPC didn't see Moon as an Oscar picture, and they're probably right. I mean, it would have been nice to send out screeners, but it isn't like this was the most mystifying screener snub in history.Then the story took a turn for the LOL, when Movieline reached out to SPC and asked why they didn't send out Moon screeners.
Thus spake SPC:
“The DVD and Blu-ray come out on Jan. 12 — next Tuesday — and it was felt that to preserve the integrity of the film, we didn’t want to send screeners,” the rep told me. “We’re concerned about piracy. The thing about Moon is that its particular genre is very predisposed toward being uploaded onto the Web. We really just wanted to protect that aspect of it. It’s a simple as that. […] A lot of publicity for Moon is coming out next week. Hopefully that will remind all the consumers, all the readers — and especially any awards folks — that this terrific title is out there.”
Oh man. That's so dumb. First of all, the movie has been out on DVD and Blu in the UK for weeks and weeks. I haven't checked, but the fact that it's been on home video for a month in another country leads me to believe it's surely been pirated already. But on top of that, SPC could have just sent some of those DVDs that are being pressed for release to awards types. I know they don't want to spend a whole bunch of money - that's really the main reason they didn't send out screeners in the first place - but the fact that DVDs exist makes their lack of interest in supporting the picture seem doubly stupid. Hell, they should have just cried 'The Economy!' and everybody would have gotten it. Instead they're playing the piracy boogeyman at a time when it's evident to any thinking person that this particular monster is already out of the closet.
In the meantime, order your copy of Moon through CHUD by clicking here.
* I mean, I care sort of, but this awards season stuff is horrible bullshit. A good movie is no better or worse depending on its nomination status. Nominations might help Moon sell DVDs, but I feel like it's really unlikely that the film would ever get awards traction, just from knowing how those horrible awards groups operate. That said, good on Duncan Jones for continuing to support Sam Rockwell through a grassroots campaign.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Magic Of Velcro)
Sam Rockwell deserves noms. Noms noms noms.
Comment #2 (Posted by longbowhunter)
Anytime I see a dumb-ass studio comment like this,I immediately start rooting for The Pirates. Hopefully this will be uploaded all to hell despite the stupidity of the suits.
Comment #3 (Posted by seniormoogle)
Arrrrghhh!
Comment #4 (Posted by greg)
They got a point though. Lovely Bones award screener has already been pirated and online for a while now. 7
Comment #5 (Posted by Ryan)
Note to people who still don't get it:
Awards nominations have little to nothing to do with the quality of a film, nor do they legitimise your enjoyment of said film.
Comment #6 (Posted by Bongo Jerry)
so now anybody from the academy wanting to review the film will now have to enter ''moon r5'' into google and watch it by streaming. so unfair.
Comment #7 (Posted by deth bandit)
So ... the Academy is behind all the piracy?
OMG this thing goes all the way to the top!
Comment #8 (Posted by Moon Unit Zappa)
Lol
Comment #9 (Posted by O HAI)
I...I mean a friend of mine...has had a ripped copy of this that he has watched several times and has loved every minute of.
Comment #10 (Posted by sjs)
All they have to do is hide a little code in the screener, like you could spot it using a color filter, and then when the pirated copy goes up you'd know exactly whose copy was used. Then you sue them for millions.
Comment #11 (Posted by Note To Ryan)
Not trying to be a dick, but here's how it works for many of us... It's nice to see a film one enjoys and endorses win an award -- especially when said movie is good. Not to mention the bevy of crap it's inevitably going to be up against. For a lot of us, it has nothing to do with bragging rights, nor is it a way to say "See! I told you that 'Movie' was great". It's just gratifying for fans.
Comment #12 (Posted by PubeTube)
lol @ "concern over piracy" considering I saw this one via a Blu-ray rip torrent about a month ago. Excellent movie BTW!
Comment #13 (Posted by Avatar)
Avatar
Comment #14 (Posted by Astrolupine)
Didn't even get a release here in Newfoundland. Stupid cheeseheads.
Comment #15 (Posted by Jason)
As insulting to our intelligence as this is, it drives me a little nuts when people start cheerleading the concept of watching movies for free, especially the indignant assertion that it is somehow your right as a consumer to do so. Yes, the studios are bloated beasts, but the less money Moon takes in, the less chance you have of seeing another movie of it's pedigree. I thought this was a movie site! Come on, guys!
That's my mini soapbox speech.
Comment #16 (Posted by Pirate Bay)
@#15 - Who the fuck are you kidding? I don't pirate movies, nor do I condone it, but pretending that pirating movies affects anything is pretty naive at this point. A movie like Moon barely gets released as it is. The great majority of cities and towns in this country do not even get the opportunity to see it in theaters without driving many miles outside of where they live to do so. This is a studio choice and they know the impact dollar wise. They also do not spend any money on advertising, which will once again determine box office numbers. They also understand that a small movie with no marketing isn't exactly going to sell a million DVDs to anyone beside the rental market. A studio is not sitting on the edge of their seats counting data on how many times their already forgotten film is rented. In the end, the audience that pirates is not the audience that drives out of their way to see an unadvertised film in a small art theater, nor are they the audience that will buy said film. Pirating probably takes away less than a thousand rentals of a film like that and has no impact on a film like this whatsoever.What fucks up the film industry is you sheep that flock to see Transformers in the theater and you assholes that stay away from a slam dunk like Drag Me To Hell. Piracy is a false boogeyman that corporations flaunt like the Bush Admistration flogged 911. Wake up and smell the propaganda already. The Piracy numbers are inflated bullshit that has nothing to do with how studios piss all over small and/or indie films. It's a lowest common denominator industry that only gets worse as we all get dumber.
Comment #17 (Posted by Wayne)
"I didn't run this because a) ehhh, who cares*" That's funny, I say that about half the stories you run, Devin.
Comment #18 (Posted by Who knows me)
Yeah, Moon's been out for a while on the web. Get on the torrents people! You're not saving anyone any time!
Comment #19 (Posted by Citizen Burke)
I think it's time to link the comment section to the forum accounts and require a login. These twelve year old anonymous aholes will be more controllable then.
Comment #20 (Posted by Jason)
@#16 - You spent all that time and effort blasting me for a point that I agree with you on, and then use Drag Me To Hell as your example of a slam dunk? Piracy does not greatly affect larger pictures but it does not effectively scale down to the point that it has zero impact on small or zero-budget movies, and until you start using better metaphors (9/11...really?) you're not the genius that's going to convince me otherwise.
@Citizen Burke - Yes, it's time to de-anonymize the internet in general!
Comment #21 (Posted by Keith)
It'll end up being better for the film Moon and Jones himself. It will be a cult classic in the same way Blade Runner is. Cult classics get their status because of word of mouth. It means a hell of a lot more than what an anonymous academy thinks. And besides, Jones will undoubtedly make another great film in the future that will get nominated.
Comment #22 (Posted by RCCola)
While he was a bit of a dick about it; I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree with #16 here.


