FIGHT THE SHIP: PETER BERG TALKS BATTLESHIP
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 12/1/2009
- News

Yesterday I took an incredible trip: boarding a private jet in Van Nuys, I and a handful of other reporters went down to San Diego, where we toured the USS Sterett, the most modern destroyer in the US Navy, and met with director Peter Berg. Seeing how a cutting edge warship works would have been more than enough to drag me out of my house, but the real reason for the trip was to talk about Berg's next movie, Battleship. Yes, the film based on the board game.
A couple of weeks ago Latino Review revealed that the bad guys in Battleship won't be another Earthly navy but in fact an alien fleet; that revelation is what spurred Berg and Universal to put this expedition together, as they wanted to get information about the movie - which won't start filming until next spring - out there to combat rumor, speculation and the natural skepticism that comes from hearing a movie is being made from one of the most plotless board games of all time.
Berg opened up the info floodgates, even showing us pre-production concepts of the alien ships. Designed by ILM, who will be doing the FX, the alien ships look like giant water bugs, with giant hydrofoil legs that race across the surface of the sea. They're huge, black and scary looking.
One of the other images Berg showed us was the USS Missouri, a battleship (see below for more on it) with its guns blazing, being pushed sideways by the force of the blasts. The image was a poster mock up with the tagline 'Fight the Ship' emblazoned at the bottom. Fighting the ship is a bit of Navy lingo for manning the ship in a battle, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was the official tagline when the movie comes out.
I'm going to be bringing you more about my experience on the Sterett, but in the meantime here are some of the salient points that Berg shared with us on the plane ride home.
- The alien race is known as The Regents. They will be a combo of actors and CGI; Berg used Davey Jones from Pirates of the Caribbean as a reference point, although he did make sure we knew that the design of The Regents is much less complex than Jones' heavily betentacled face.
Berg: They have a similar biological make-up to us, and they come from a place with a similar ecology to ours. Our planet is of interest to us ecologically.
- The aliens aren't on Earth to take over or destroy us. They have a goal on Earth - a goal Berg wouldn't explain beyond saying they're building something (he showed us concept art of this, and all I can really tell you is it looks like they're building a huge bivouac) - and that goal brings the aliens into conflict with a five ship fleet.
Berg: I would actually say it's more A Bridge Over the River Kwai. They're trying to build something because they're in trouble, and they need a power source. They're trying to get something completed, and they're not particularly concerned with any life that [gets in their way]. They don't have anything against you, but if you interfere with their agenda, they'll kill you.
- The Regents don't have super technology. Their weapons are ballistics-based. While their boats are inserted into Earth's atmosphere through flight, once they get to the water they stay on the water. At least one of their ships is damaged; this is likely part of why they're on Earth.
Berg: Some of [the alien ships] are very violent. Some of them aren't, but some of them are the equivalent of our destroyers. They fire ballistics, explosive ballistics.
[The Regent ship is] able to move in different directions. It's not entirely hydrofoil, but if you've ever seen slow motion of water bugs, how they can move along the sea, think about that.
They've got a problem. Upon arrival one of their ships is severely damaged and that poses a logistic problem for them. [Note: could this be why they can't just take off back to space?]
- We'll get to know The Regents. Berg doesn't intend to keep their tactics or their mission a big secret from audiences. We will see at least some of the action from their side.
Berg: You'll understand [the aliens]. ILM's doing a terrific job of creating The Regents, the folks who inhabit these ships. Some of them are very scientific and very intelligent, not violent at all, and others are more violent. But they're all concerned with the fact that they have a very real mechanical problem with one of their ships, and they're trying to deal with that.
- The hero of the film is the Commanding Officer of a destroyer. The destroyer is the main ship in the film, and during the tour of the Sterett Berg told us (and the Sterett's CO confirmed) that battleships are mostly sidelined in today's Navy.
- The hero has a team of five guys. Among them will be the XO, a Mustang (an enlisted man who has risen through the ranks to become an officer) and the chief engineer, who Berg calls a 'modern day Scotty.'
- There is a battleship component, but Berg won't explain how it works. However, he did mention that
- There is a WWII component as well. While the movie is set in the modern day and features the most cutting edge naval tech, a WWII element comes into play. I'm just spitballing here, but I bet that the alien's goal, as well as the enigmatic battleship, are connected to this WWII component.
- Aspects of the game will be in the movie, and Berg wants them in there as intelligently as possible. As you know, the whole point of Battleship is guessing where your enemy has his ships, and sinking them. While touring the Sterett Berg pointed out ways that actual naval warfare could be applied to this concept. For instance, while visiting the CIC, we were shown how the destroyer identifies boats, planes, subs and other objects around it (they're called tracks) and then makes the decision if they're friendly or hostile. We were then shown how, using high tech weapons systems, the destroyer fires upon the track and adjusts fire if need be. Of course, what would happen if all of that technology doesn't work? Well...
- The Regents will in some way render the Navy's high tech inoperable. Falling back on old school methods, our heroes must track and destroy the alien fleet with whatever tools they have, including trial and error. Just like in the game.
Berg: These ships don't constantly show up on our radar; we can't find them. The ways we go about fighting them is a recurring theme throughout the film.
- This is more strategic warfare. Again, since the alien tech is not unbeatable or far beyond our own, and since Berg wants to reflect the game, the battle won't be about our Navy fighting an unstoppable opponent but rather about two evenly matched groups out-thinking one another through strategy.
Berg: Some take more shots to sink and kill than do others. Just like our ships. But they're killable.
- Someone will say 'You sank my battleship!' in the movie. In fact, Berg is adamant that it has to be there. He also said there will be other nods to the game.
Berg: Hells yeah!
- The hero fleet will be cut off from the rest of the world in some way. There will be a five ship fleet taking on The Regents, and for whatever reason, they cannot communicate with the rest of the Navy and so must handle the threat on their own.
- The hero fleet will have an international component. One of the ships will be Japanese. Will this Japanese ship be part of the WWII component? Unclear.
- There will be close quarters fighting. In the Navy they call it a 'knife fight,' when two ships are close enough to fire small caliber weapons at one another (keep in mind that in the Navy a small caliber weapon is a huge machine gun. That's small when compared to the mammoth 5 inch rounds the destroyer's main gun fires).
- Berg wants to make Battleship as realistic a look at naval battle as possible, considering the bad guys are aliens. Berg opted not to have any Earthly foe because he thought the plot gymanstics required to explain why the US Navy is at war with any of the comparable navies would be too much.
Berg: The idea of finding a credible context for that eluded me. The idea of a film where America goes to war against China, or a movie where America goes to war against England or Australia or Japan, one of the countries that has a credible navy, felt like it would borderline on some kind of jingoistic American military exercise I couldn't get my head around. I like the idea of something bigger, larger than life and the challenge it presented.
- They're casting now. Berg says he's a fan of the way JJ Abrams cast Star Trek, which I take to mean he's looking for some unknowns (but if you're reading this, Peter - John Hamm as the captain of the destroyer!)
- The USS Missouri could play a role. This is interesting for a couple of reasons: The Missouri is a battleship in service today, but it also fought in WWII. The ship had been decommissioned but was refitted in the 90s, modernizing it. But there's more! The Missouri is where the Japanese surrendered at the end of WWII - you get your WII, your battleship and an aspect of the Japanese all in here.
Berg: It's in Hawaii now. It fired the first shot in the Iraq War. It's a 900 foot battleship, it's got 16 inch guns. The one 5 inch gun you saw on the destroyer is more accurate because of the radar system, but the power of this ship is awesome and unequaled. When it fires [the ship] blows about 50 yards sideways. They call it fighting the ship.
- Our tour of the Sterett was intended to show us locations that will be in the movie. They included the bridge, the 5-inch gun loading bay, the rocket loading bay and the CIC (combat command center).
- Berg has a response to Stephen Colbert's joke about the movie that will be put out virally.
- Dune impacted Berg making this film. While that film won't happen, the prep gave him confidence to do Battleship.
Berg: It got me excited about the idea of world creation. Any time you embark on world creation - even if you're James Cameron and you did it before, even if you grew up designing space ships - it's any incredibly daunting and unnerving task. To think 'Okay, I'm going to throw my hat in the ring of world creation,' you've seen my films, I've never done that before, and it was intimidating. I met with enough world creation designers to get over the hump and understand how you would go about doing it.
- Expect Battleship in IMAX. And Berg is also thinking about shooting some sequences in 3D.
Look for my recounting of the visit to the Sterett later. In the meantime, give us your thoughts and speculation on our message boards.
- Expect Battleship in IMAX. And Berg is also thinking about shooting some sequences in 3D.
Look for my recounting of the visit to the Sterett later. In the meantime, give us your thoughts and speculation on our message boards.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by asdf)
Battleships are pretty badass. I could see this being leveraged on film to good effect. So... maybe.
Comment #2 (Posted by Ryan)
OK, sounds like it justified itself. Probably moreso than any other boardgame movie.
Comment #3 (Posted by karate9)
I commend your journalism. You are on the cutting edge. I must say I respect you guys way more now. You are on top of the Battleship phenomenon, the most important thing to me. I can't wait for your next article about Battleship's future. I enjoy coming to this site and seeing that you, Devin, know how important Battleship is to the reader's of your website. You have earned a new level of respect in my eyes. Before, I just used to visit chud for the news, but now I check this website everyday for the groundbreaking insight into Battleship.
Comment #4 (Posted by SeamanStaines)
Interesting to see how one filmmaker responds in his own way to a damage control situation. Fair play to him. I'm guessing the Navy loves the shit out of any potential recruitment project and will happily open it's...er, gang planks? in support.
Comment #5 (Posted by an unknown user)
I really hope Berg's movie tanks (I mean, seriously, not a very engaging idea) and Variety explodes the headline: "Battleship sunk." Hells yeah!
Comment #6 (Posted by Crom)
Sounds cool. Berg is a working man's director. Even when he fails, I respect his efforts.
Comment #7 (Posted by Bozz)
Why would aliens need battleships? And how will they deploy them? They travel lightyears across the universe in their spacecraft to suddenly just fight on water?
Comment #8 (Posted by Glen Manning)
"A working man's director?" WTF does that even mean? Wait... PLANT!
Comment #9 (Posted by DTOE)
Battleships do not move sideways while firing a broadside. http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-022.htm
Comment #10 (Posted by Tundro the Tremendous)
Don't mean to be pessimistic but this sounds awful.
Comment #11 (Posted by SAmodernist)
Why cant the other fleet have been a Mutinous American Fleet? Then it does not have to be USA against another country? How much do you want to bet at the end some of the Inteligent Regents join with the US Fleet to destroy a more violent small group of Regents that take over. Then the US Fleet help the good Regents get back home.
Comment #12 (Posted by Aging Derelict)
What's next, Mouse Trap?
Comment #13 (Posted by Craig)
Did "Bridge Over the River Kwai" really just get compared to a Battleship movie?
Comment #14 (Posted by Pete)
Craig: You didn't know? "Bridge Over the River Kwai" started out as "Jenga: the Motion Picture".
Comment #15 (Posted by Calvin Hobbes)
Aliens, so stupid. Why give up the ultimate high ground of space to fight on the seas? Humans being don't even fight there anymore!
A better solution: the US conducts another Philadelphia Experiment, opening a gateway to another dimension where a fascist government rules another parallel earth. Voila! No need to explain why ETs can't just sink our ships.
Comment #16 (Posted by Jujube for sale)
Hopefully the effects will be better than the shitbox ones in Hancock. Based on Bergs last two movies, he seems to have developed an inability to end his films without them turning into colossal shitheaps. I'd like to get excited about this but until I see: A) A script review that says the third act isn't a total pile and B) A trailer where the effects don't like bad 90's blue screen work, I'm not going really care. Devin can attached his fat face to Peters Crotch after one set visit and I'm sure we'll read about his jizz worthy coverage of this EVENT film for the next 1 year plus, but most people on this TB have got the right idea. Battleships VS space aliens = DUMB.
Comment #17 (Posted by AgentofChaos)
There is nothing in the movie that will be as cool as the photo at the top of this article.
And as a taxpayer, I want to know WTF the Navy is doing running a pre-production junket when we're about to send 30,000 soldiers to Afghanistan. Isn't there paint that needs to be scrapped?
Comment #18 (Posted by Tony)
He lost me at aliens. And destroyer. A destroyer is a warship, yes, but not a Battleship. When I see battleship, that means I want a good old fashioned big gun Battleship. The kind Mom used to make. Dreadnought, Yamato, Musashi, Missouri. Those were Battleships; and why aliens? Hollywoodheads always have to scifi everything.
Comment #19 (Posted by an unknown user)
Just throw in George Bush as the bad guy and have a half black president as the good buy. Princess Kate can be the mascot for all you liberal douchebags that are becoming the joke of the internet.
Comment #20 (Posted by Bill Brasky)
It would make sense for the alien vessels to be cloaked in some fashion that prevents them from being seen/detected by sonar. Then perhaps the American ships would have to use tactics similar to playing Battleship to hit them.
Comment #21 (Posted by Not Bill Brasky)
"Battleship Sunk By ice-Berg!" You know that title lies in this movie's future if it fails.
Comment #22 (Posted by That Bill Brasky is a sonofabitch)
"And Berg is also thinking about shooting some sequences in 3D."
Excellent. Nothing immerses me into a movie experience quite like having to repeatedly put on & take off 3d glasses.
Comment #23 (Posted by TheColonel)
I'm sorry, but this sounds like a colossal piece of shit. All this geeky "genre" stuff they're grafting to this board game adaptation is just lipstick on a bloated, unoriginal pig. We're really not that far off from "Ass: The Movie," are we?
Comment #24 (Posted by luke)
If they can pull this turd out of nowhere why can't they make "Pick-Up Sticks:The Movie?"
Comment #25 (Posted by Styrophoamicus)
I'm remain on the fence with this one until I at least see a trailer. Hopefully this will be a 'Pirates of the Caribbean'-like surprise
Comment #26 (Posted by PimpMyBattleship)
WTF #19: somebody wanked up blood this morning... @#23: about 16 days til "Ass: the Movie" comes out (Zing!).
Comment #27 (Posted by Alex)
yes, #19, this big fat, rather odd, commercial for the US Navy is going to be such a liberal propaganda piece designed to make children hate guns and Jesus, and to love terrorism and sodomy. then we'll all go get abortions!
Comment #28 (Posted by daveed)
All US battleships are retired, including the USS Missouri (decommissioned in the early 90s and never reactivated).
So the script will pull a magic battleship out of its ass. Prob a vessel time transported from WW2 that will be impervious to the alien tech. It's <em>Independence Day</em> meets <em>The Final Countdown</em>.
Good fucking Christ.
Comment #29 (Posted by Chase Horton)
I'm amazed at how stupid of an idea this is. I wonder what A or B List actor is willing to phone this one in for twenty million?
Comment #30 (Posted by RCA)
wow, this sounds like the Nauticals of Riddick.... i.e. not a good idea.
Comment #31 (Posted by David)
I was sitting on the beach with my dog the other day. I look to the right and the USS Missouri is being tugged out of Pearl Harbor! I was like holy crap! I knew she had just come out of dry dock but I didnt know it was going to be underway. Come to find out from a friend who was onboard that the Mighty Mo was being towed out there and anchored for the movie Battleship. Being an active duty sailor having volunteered working on the her teak deck, I am very excited to see what her role is in the movie.

