- Home
- Editorial
- The Devin's Advocate
- THE DEVIN'S ADVOCATE: IT'S TIME FOR JOSS WHEDON TO CHANGE THE WORLD
THE DEVIN'S ADVOCATE: IT'S TIME FOR JOSS WHEDON TO CHANGE THE WORLD
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 11/11/2009
- News
So Dollhouse was canceled. I watched a couple of episodes and it never grabbed me; the second season numbers indicate I wasn't alone. But maybe this is actually good news for Joss Whedon. Maybe this is what it takes to get him into the business of changing the way we consume media.It's obvious that the stuff that Whedon does isn't built for a mass network television audience. Firefly and Dollhouse have proven this fairly conclusively; I don't doubt that Whedon could change up what he does to make it more mainstream, but why should he? Not everything should appeal to everybody. It should appeal to somebody, and Whedon has that somebody down pat - he has a certain audience that follows him from project to project, loyal to him and what he does. That audience isn't quite enough to keep a show on a network alive, but it could still be harnessed in really exciting ways.
Whedon needs to fully leap into the world of direct to DVD and On Demand programming. He's already dipped his toe in those waters with Dr. Horrible's Sing-a-long Blog, which was an artistic success and apparently fiscally successful enough to warrant an impending sequel. Instead of going through a network, dealing with their interference and their programming whims and the need to appeal to a very wide audience so as to sell time to Viagra advertisers Whedon can concentrate on serving his fanbase with his vision.
He's the perfect creator to make a major leap into this arena because he's likely the creator with the most ardent fanbase today*. There's a certain number of Whedonites out there - probably in the hundreds of thousands - who will plop down money to buy/rent/download anything Whedon puts out. Starting from that base Whedon can market his product out; while Dr. Horrible started as something specific to Whedonites it definitely crossed over, and that was a project that started as a lark.
It wouldn't be easy. Whedon would have to adjust the way that he creates, and his budgets would, at first, be much lower than they are with network TV. But if he is willing to put the work in he can change the entire paradigm of how we consume content from our favorite creators. Striking deals with as many On Demand platforms as possible - cable companies, Xbox Live, Playstation Network, iTunes - and possibly hooking up with a DVD company, Whedon could reach markets and niches that Fox simply never serves.
Of course there are people already in those trenches - web series are becoming a dime a dozen. And the best bets for Whedon to move into this world - direct to DVD or On Demand movies featuring characters from Buffy and Angel - are out of his hands, since he doesn't own those characters. But Whedon has a creative well that hasn't run dry yet, and he has a fanbase that will support him in the first stages of creating something new.
This is the direction that things are headed no matter what, and Whedon can serve as the person who breaks down the wall, who takes the shameful connotation off of content created just for DVD or On Demand or the internet. If Whedon brings his A game, gathers his usual band of collaborators and gets his fanbase fired up and involved (which he did for Dr. Horrible), he could drag the rest of the industry kicking and screaming into a new world where niche programming can find its level and survive. I'm not in denial about how tough it would be or how slow it would start out, especially budgetarily, but it's beyond time that someone major took a serious step into bringing content directly to fans instead of relying on a middle-man.
Imagine a world where a show like Arrested Development or Battlestar Galactica isn't constantly in fear of getting the axe, where shows don't have to dumb it down to reach the widest audience, where creators don't have to worry about skittish advertisers, where fans put up or shut up by supporting what they really like.
* Obviously the real person who could make this happen would be George Lucas, but as long as he gets to dictate his terms to studios and TV networks, there's no reason for him to take his stuff On Demand just yet.
Spread The Word
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Allan Smithee)
Writers are like little children. When they get out of line, and start thinking they run the show, they need to get their little a**es paddled. PADDLED.
Comment #2 (Posted by asfm)
Did Firefly actually prove that it isn't fit for a mainstream audience?
Fox didn't market it very well, they showed the episodes out of order (did they even show them all?) - including the FIRST EPISODE being one of the last shown and I think they changed it around in their schedule a few times.
I mean, it's a witty (but by no means prohibitively intelligent) show with a great cast, and neither the scifi or western motifs are leaning on too heavily to make it alienating. I could've seen it doing very well if it had been aired properly, and given a little time to breathe.
Dollhouse is just generally bad, though. It deserved to be cancelled. Season 2 might end up being decent (River Tam, Colonel Tigh and Special Agent Lundy all in the same freaking show!), but, yeah, it's just no good.
I just hope whatever Whedon does next - or ever - is not on Fox. My friends and I use the word Fox (to Fox, Foxed) to mean ruin.
Comment #3 (Posted by Anonemuss0)
Speaking as a rabid Whedon-ite who happily watches anything affiliated with firefly, a more direct approach really does seem like a great idea for a fan base like those of Whedon.
Comment #4 (Posted by seniormoogle)
Holy Shit?! Allowing comments again? Anyway, obviously Devin has a lot to say about someone he really doesn't care about. "I watched a couple of episodes and it never grabbed me;" Why don't you go lie to a few more people about how many times you've read Moby Dick.
Comment #5 (Posted by Lucas)
I read Moby Dick once. Got a problem?
Comment #6 (Posted by SignalNoise)
Does anyone know why Whedon keeps going to *network* TV? I mean, wouldn't FX or amc be interested in a Joss show - and he could work in shorter bursts (13 eps), with more freedom, and less ratings expectations. Seems like a natural fit.
Comment #7 (Posted by Vam)
I have to say, as a Whedon-ite (as it were), I think this is a great idea. As many know, Whedons vision is often obscured or relegated in translation. Also, through Dr. horrible he has been able to show that he can make quality on a non existent budget, so this is an idea that can really work for him, without the interference that he usually is given on the network.
Also, I would like to note that I JUST caught up with Dollhouse, and while the first season was good but not great, the second season is far superior, despite the numbers. It really had not yet come into its own until the unaired Epitaph One, which really redesigned the way the show came off, and gave it a much richer overall concept, which the second season is now running with.
Plus, as Whedon has noted before, theres more Summer Glau!
Comment #8 (Posted by Ryan)
seniormoogle, did you just read the first paragraph and then go straight to comments? Or are you reading comprehension skills the level of a third grade child? Devin is clearly stating a personal opinion, and then using the rest of the article to say Whedon should stop playing the networks game and go do his own thing which he'll most likely succeed at and pave the way for future television.
Stop being so reactionary and protective of Whedon, for god's sake.
Comment #9 (Posted by Andrew)
I agree wholeheartedly that Whedon should pioneer creating series for online consumption. Dr. Horrible was very well done for what it was and I would like to see what kinds of ideas he could unleash with out having to trim them down to the whims of networks like Fox. In fact when Dollhouse got picked up by Fox I groaned since I know that he tried doing Firefly with them and they killed that quickly. The fact that Dollhouse even got a second season is surprising, but in light of it's cancellation just not confidence inspiring.
Comment #10 (Posted by Jason Pollock)
Is it protective of Whedon, or - like the bulk of these comments - instantly hateful of Faraci (regardless of whether or not he's done anything to generate it at the moment)?
Comment #11 (Posted by Aaron)
Netflix could be the right partner for this sort of thing to really drive the purchase of instant-streaming set-top boxes. I don't know that they could afford Whedon, given that must of the stuff Netflix has produced has been pretty low-budget, but there's no reason Netflix couldn't be the HBO of the internet. And after some period of Netflix-exclusive release, Whedon puts out a dvd with a bunch of special features. Everybody wins.
Comment #12 (Posted by Ryan)
Firefly. They need to make more and tell Fox to piss off. I'll do whatever I've gotta do to get more Firefly. I'll take it however they're selling it. Making a video game? I'm there. It's an MMORPG? I'm a lifetime member. Just fucking make it, Joss.
Comment #13 (Posted by seniormoogle)
It's Faraci. Dollhouse rules, Firefly ruled. Faraci will never know cuz he's too lazy to find out. Dollhouse isn't for "Whedonites" or whatever, it's for anyone who gave it a real chance. Same with Firefly, Buffy, etc. I think AMC, SyFy, Fx, are the place for Whedon. Not the internet. Not yet at least. What pisses me off about this is that Devin uses a whole advocate column to give his 10 cents worth about something he doesn't really even care about. Devin this is the Chud show. GO FUCK YOURSELF!
Comment #14 (Posted by DrVenkman)
No Dollhouse certainly doesn't rule. It has the potential to, as we saw with 'Epitaph One', but the whole story is really interesting end without a beginning. In some ways seeing Epitaph One made things worse, you can see how good the show can potentially be but instead we're left languishing with Eliza Dushku frowning in an effort to convey emotion.
That's not even getting into the issues of the Dollhouse itself. It seems that every episode the show has yet to convince me exactly *why* the Dollhouse exists. It has no commercial application, I mean in one episode Echo is hired as a midwife, a fucking midwife! Why the fuck would you do that instead of you know...going to an actual midwife.
The only time the show came close to convincing me of the existence of the Dollhouse is in the Patton Oswalt episode. It was the first time I thought "Ok I get it".
I still think it's a show of interesting ideas. It's just not an interesting show.
Comment #15 (Posted by Benny-bebop)
Fox - verb. To ruin.
Fox - noun. Animal who has cubs then eats them.
Comment #16 (Posted by Krell)
Firefly. Keen Eddie. Dollhouse. The list goes on of quality shows Firefox has axed before their time.
Dollhouse S1 sucked, but Epitaph One upped the ante and S2 has been pretty solid so far. I hope Joss wraps it up with a bang (he did not get the chance with Firefly, unless you count Serenity) and gets some good ratings.
I don't care what Joss does next, I just know I'll be watching. BTW, how is it he doesn't own Buffy if he is doing the comics? Weird, but I think Faraci might have his facts wrong there. I don't know. Just sayin.
Personally, I think Firefly needs to be explored further. Fuck F/X. Maybe TNT? SyFy is too campy. Or maybe a new category -- "Direct to Hulu"??
Comment #17 (Posted by Right Bastard)
"Dollhouse" does not rule. I am a Whedon fan (and thoroughly enjoy Dushku's boobs), but it took effort for me to get in to that show. Granted, Fox was trying to sabotage(?) the show from the start; and Whedon and Dushku both say that THEIR version of the show did not start until episode 6. Fox putting the show on Friday night, when people go out, didn't help matters either. I think Devin's assessment is quite correct. I have been quite impressed with many direct-to-DVD films, but it will take someone like Whedon to remove the stigma.
Comment #18 (Posted by Sinistercats)
I believe it's been said before- Dushku had an exclusive production deal with Fox and she went to Joss. Friends helping friends more than a burning desire to bend over for Fox again.
Comment #19 (Posted by Toooom)
You know it's a Whedon movie/show when the audience is dressed as chairs.
Comment #20 (Posted by William Maggos)
Wikipedia says that after Dollhouse, he is committing fully to the internet distribution. Great, if true.
I would recommend distribution via bittorrent-rss ala Miro, and asking for donations on a website. Or perhaps something like Kickstarter, where he lays out what a show will cost and sees if folks would commit to donating if he does it.

