- Home
- Editorial
- The Devin's Advocate
- THE DEVIN'S ADVOCATE: CONFESSIONS OF A TREKKIE
THE DEVIN'S ADVOCATE: CONFESSIONS OF A TREKKIE
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 11/25/2008
- The Devin's Advocate

That's me in the picture above, celebrating a birthday. I'm not sure which one, but it's sometime at the end of the 70s. And as you can tell, I was a dweeby little Trekkie even back then.
The recent deluge of press about JJ Abrams' Star Trek has reawakened a part of me that I thought was long dead: my love of the original Star Trek. It's been weird coming to grips with the fact that I still really like the original series and the original crew, and even weirder to realize that the nuggets of stupid trivia I memorized as a pre-teen nerd are still in my head, easily reached. Unlike everything I learned in school at that age.
Apparently I was born a Star Trek nerd. I was fasinated by the series on TV as a toddler, and before I was five I was proclaiming William Shatner to be the greatest actor alive. I had the Star Trek Mego toys, and as you can see, Star Trek clothing.
As I got older I held onto the love of Trek. I would sit up all night to watch Star Trek repeats at midnight on WPIX 11 in New York, cursing the nights when a long football game would delay the start of an episode. I was archiving them on VHS (one of the tapes included the famous Shatner 'Get a life!' appearance on Saturday Night Live), and back in the days before the internet it was a big task to figure out what order they should be watched. Channel 11 didn't strip them in original air order, so I ended up knee deep in Star Trek books to figure it all out.
And knee deep I was. I was buying (and, to be honest with you, stealing from the library) novelizations of Star Trek episodes as well as the occasional extended universe novels. I didn't dig them as much as the novelizations, which I assumed were like the movie novelizations I loved as a kid - full of details edited from the finished movie. Before the days of Director's Cuts and Extended Editions, the novelizations were the only way to find out what didn't get past the editing bay.
The extended universe novels didn't do it for me because they weren't canon; even in grade school I understood the difference between the official material and the extra junk. I was fascinated with the canon, and Star Trek is perfect for people who obsess over details like the Federation Constitution, which I had in an official Trek tech manual. Also in that book was detailed schematics of the Enterprise, which hung on the wall next to my bunk bed. Watching Justin Long in Galaxy Quest brings me pretty forcefully back to my life in sixth grade.
In the past I've written about how The Empire Strikes Back was my first experience with spoilers, but it was the Star Trek movies that really had me searching them out. I would devour everything from Starlog to the letter column in the DC Comics Star Trek monthly to find out what Paramount was doing with the film franchise. Coming home with cheeks still wet from Spock's death at the end of Wrath of Khan, I became totally convinced of the idea that a Romulan war was coming next. Hell, I was probably this close to writing a script about it myself.
These days going to conventions is part of the job, but the very first one I went to was a Star Trek con. It was also the beginning of the end of my fascination with the brand. It was exciting to meet the actors (at the time I wasn't that concerned with anybody behind the scenes, to be honest, and I don't even know how prominent they were at these conventions), but it was sobering to see who else was there. I was always the nerdiest kid in my group, the one who knew the most about everything from Star Trek to Star Wars to horror movies to Planet of the Apes to Marvel comics to whatever cartoons we all watched every Saturday, but even I was stunned at the kind of people who showed up at this con. While waiting in line to get James Doohan's autograph I had to clear the aisle so that what appeared to be a 700 pound Klingon could get through.
I was ecstatic when The Next Generation premiered, but I was quickly disillusioned. The show was boring, the characters way too uptight for any fun. Where was the Spock/Bones interplay? Number One was supposed to be the dashing Kirk-type of the show, but it was pretty obvious that Jonathan Frakes was about as dashing as a math teacher. After a season I gave up on it.
A year or so later Star Trek V: The Final Frontier hit theaters and almost totally severed my love of the franchise. I was in high school at this point, and keenly interested in girls... and keenly aware that girls in Queens New York were not looking for Star Trek fans. By 1989, the year Trek V came out, I had quit the Science Fiction club and the Board Game club (Axis & Allies after school every Tuesday!) and was trying (and failing) to reshape my image into one that girls would like. The growing shittiness of Trek was making that very easy; there are two Trek film experiences I remember with incredible clarity: coming home from Wrath of Khan in the back of my mom's red Corrolla and being just amazed and moved by what I had seen and sitting in an empty movie theater with my friend Brian Scolaro (who has gone on to be a succesful comic and TV actor, one of a couple of guys from my class who made good) cracking jokes at The Final Frontier. That would have been unthinkable a couple of years before.
Star Trek VI briefly rekindled my passion, but by the time Generations came and Kirk was killed off in a terrible, unceremonious manner I was out. I cashed in my chips, threw away my Trek stuff and never looked back again. I would briefly check in on a new Trek series every time it aired, and I saw First Contact in theaters, but that was the end of it all for me.
Then a couple of years ago Trek hit DVD in box set form. I was intrigued but put off by the price. At about the same time the original series started getting rerun in a fairly aggressive way on TV Land, and I found myself drawn in to it. At first I was grooving on the campy aspects of the show - the outfits, the insanely over the top acting (seriously, Shatner as the greatest living actor? I was one dumb five year old), the gloriously cheap sets - but slowly I began to see through that stuff and remember what it was that I liked about the show in the first place.
Star Trek - the original series, anyway - represents a kind of swashbuckling adventure that we don't see anymore. And while the original series has massive limitations in terms of effects and make-up, it also represents a work of imagination that's inspiring. Where Star Wars has a small universe, Trek has an incredibly big one; while some people complain that every episode saw the introduction of yet another crinkly-nosed alien race, that's part of what I loved about the show. There were so many new worlds, so many new situations and so many new ideas presented that you could just drown in them.
And at the core of all that was the relationship between Kirk, Spock and Bones. None of these guys were great actors, and maybe they hated each other behind the scenes, but that trio is one of the great friendships in film and television history. And spinning off of that are these other characters, all great at what they do, all dedicated and supporting one another, creating a weird but essentially wonderful family. Star Trek isn't cool for a lot of reasons, but I suspect that one of the main reasons is just how optimistic it is, and just how much the characters really care about one another and get along. Unlike The Next Generation it wasn't a sterile PC club, but a real family with disagreements and fights and the occasional full-body takeover by an evil alien... but at the end of the day all of these people were 100% there for each other. That's what made Spock's death at the end of Khan so powerful for someone who had grown up with this stuff - rather than being a dark, downer of an event it was the ultimate display of Spock's love for Kirk and everybody on that ship. No homo.
But it took JJ Abrams to really get me to stand up and say I'm a Trekkie. When I began to realize that I actually cared about the ways that he was screwing around with Trek (not with canon, but with theme - all of this destiny bullshit that has no place in Trek's liberal military universe of Master & Commander in Space stories), I had to admit to myself that there was a part of me that never stopped loving these characters. I'll never be back at the level I was in sixth grade - I only have the first four films on DVD, for instance, and don't really think I'll get around to buying the rest (unless a totally amazing set comes out. I'm enough of a nerd to cop to that) - but I'm embracing the fact that this series and the first four movies are often silly, often goofy, occasionally terrible, but always wonderful. And this isn't nostalgia (or irony) talking. I've revisited the series and the movies. I'm not longing to go back to my childhood by any means.
I'm just caught up in the human adventure.
The recent deluge of press about JJ Abrams' Star Trek has reawakened a part of me that I thought was long dead: my love of the original Star Trek. It's been weird coming to grips with the fact that I still really like the original series and the original crew, and even weirder to realize that the nuggets of stupid trivia I memorized as a pre-teen nerd are still in my head, easily reached. Unlike everything I learned in school at that age.
Apparently I was born a Star Trek nerd. I was fasinated by the series on TV as a toddler, and before I was five I was proclaiming William Shatner to be the greatest actor alive. I had the Star Trek Mego toys, and as you can see, Star Trek clothing.
As I got older I held onto the love of Trek. I would sit up all night to watch Star Trek repeats at midnight on WPIX 11 in New York, cursing the nights when a long football game would delay the start of an episode. I was archiving them on VHS (one of the tapes included the famous Shatner 'Get a life!' appearance on Saturday Night Live), and back in the days before the internet it was a big task to figure out what order they should be watched. Channel 11 didn't strip them in original air order, so I ended up knee deep in Star Trek books to figure it all out.
And knee deep I was. I was buying (and, to be honest with you, stealing from the library) novelizations of Star Trek episodes as well as the occasional extended universe novels. I didn't dig them as much as the novelizations, which I assumed were like the movie novelizations I loved as a kid - full of details edited from the finished movie. Before the days of Director's Cuts and Extended Editions, the novelizations were the only way to find out what didn't get past the editing bay.
The extended universe novels didn't do it for me because they weren't canon; even in grade school I understood the difference between the official material and the extra junk. I was fascinated with the canon, and Star Trek is perfect for people who obsess over details like the Federation Constitution, which I had in an official Trek tech manual. Also in that book was detailed schematics of the Enterprise, which hung on the wall next to my bunk bed. Watching Justin Long in Galaxy Quest brings me pretty forcefully back to my life in sixth grade.
In the past I've written about how The Empire Strikes Back was my first experience with spoilers, but it was the Star Trek movies that really had me searching them out. I would devour everything from Starlog to the letter column in the DC Comics Star Trek monthly to find out what Paramount was doing with the film franchise. Coming home with cheeks still wet from Spock's death at the end of Wrath of Khan, I became totally convinced of the idea that a Romulan war was coming next. Hell, I was probably this close to writing a script about it myself.
These days going to conventions is part of the job, but the very first one I went to was a Star Trek con. It was also the beginning of the end of my fascination with the brand. It was exciting to meet the actors (at the time I wasn't that concerned with anybody behind the scenes, to be honest, and I don't even know how prominent they were at these conventions), but it was sobering to see who else was there. I was always the nerdiest kid in my group, the one who knew the most about everything from Star Trek to Star Wars to horror movies to Planet of the Apes to Marvel comics to whatever cartoons we all watched every Saturday, but even I was stunned at the kind of people who showed up at this con. While waiting in line to get James Doohan's autograph I had to clear the aisle so that what appeared to be a 700 pound Klingon could get through.
I was ecstatic when The Next Generation premiered, but I was quickly disillusioned. The show was boring, the characters way too uptight for any fun. Where was the Spock/Bones interplay? Number One was supposed to be the dashing Kirk-type of the show, but it was pretty obvious that Jonathan Frakes was about as dashing as a math teacher. After a season I gave up on it.
A year or so later Star Trek V: The Final Frontier hit theaters and almost totally severed my love of the franchise. I was in high school at this point, and keenly interested in girls... and keenly aware that girls in Queens New York were not looking for Star Trek fans. By 1989, the year Trek V came out, I had quit the Science Fiction club and the Board Game club (Axis & Allies after school every Tuesday!) and was trying (and failing) to reshape my image into one that girls would like. The growing shittiness of Trek was making that very easy; there are two Trek film experiences I remember with incredible clarity: coming home from Wrath of Khan in the back of my mom's red Corrolla and being just amazed and moved by what I had seen and sitting in an empty movie theater with my friend Brian Scolaro (who has gone on to be a succesful comic and TV actor, one of a couple of guys from my class who made good) cracking jokes at The Final Frontier. That would have been unthinkable a couple of years before.
Star Trek VI briefly rekindled my passion, but by the time Generations came and Kirk was killed off in a terrible, unceremonious manner I was out. I cashed in my chips, threw away my Trek stuff and never looked back again. I would briefly check in on a new Trek series every time it aired, and I saw First Contact in theaters, but that was the end of it all for me.
Then a couple of years ago Trek hit DVD in box set form. I was intrigued but put off by the price. At about the same time the original series started getting rerun in a fairly aggressive way on TV Land, and I found myself drawn in to it. At first I was grooving on the campy aspects of the show - the outfits, the insanely over the top acting (seriously, Shatner as the greatest living actor? I was one dumb five year old), the gloriously cheap sets - but slowly I began to see through that stuff and remember what it was that I liked about the show in the first place.
Star Trek - the original series, anyway - represents a kind of swashbuckling adventure that we don't see anymore. And while the original series has massive limitations in terms of effects and make-up, it also represents a work of imagination that's inspiring. Where Star Wars has a small universe, Trek has an incredibly big one; while some people complain that every episode saw the introduction of yet another crinkly-nosed alien race, that's part of what I loved about the show. There were so many new worlds, so many new situations and so many new ideas presented that you could just drown in them.
And at the core of all that was the relationship between Kirk, Spock and Bones. None of these guys were great actors, and maybe they hated each other behind the scenes, but that trio is one of the great friendships in film and television history. And spinning off of that are these other characters, all great at what they do, all dedicated and supporting one another, creating a weird but essentially wonderful family. Star Trek isn't cool for a lot of reasons, but I suspect that one of the main reasons is just how optimistic it is, and just how much the characters really care about one another and get along. Unlike The Next Generation it wasn't a sterile PC club, but a real family with disagreements and fights and the occasional full-body takeover by an evil alien... but at the end of the day all of these people were 100% there for each other. That's what made Spock's death at the end of Khan so powerful for someone who had grown up with this stuff - rather than being a dark, downer of an event it was the ultimate display of Spock's love for Kirk and everybody on that ship. No homo.
But it took JJ Abrams to really get me to stand up and say I'm a Trekkie. When I began to realize that I actually cared about the ways that he was screwing around with Trek (not with canon, but with theme - all of this destiny bullshit that has no place in Trek's liberal military universe of Master & Commander in Space stories), I had to admit to myself that there was a part of me that never stopped loving these characters. I'll never be back at the level I was in sixth grade - I only have the first four films on DVD, for instance, and don't really think I'll get around to buying the rest (unless a totally amazing set comes out. I'm enough of a nerd to cop to that) - but I'm embracing the fact that this series and the first four movies are often silly, often goofy, occasionally terrible, but always wonderful. And this isn't nostalgia (or irony) talking. I've revisited the series and the movies. I'm not longing to go back to my childhood by any means.
I'm just caught up in the human adventure.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Vincent Bernard)
"I'm just caught up in the human adventure."
Of course you are. There is no shame.
Comment #2 (Posted by Patrick Sauriol)
Good thought Dev. I've always been a fan of Trek and know far too much about its fictional universe. Sure, it's got a lot of crap in there (I'm looking at you, Janeway) but it's also got two very strong points: more than a handful of great, solid sci-fi stories and a mythology that stretches across 4 decades. Why is mythology such a bad word for the suits at Paramount or JJ Abrams? Why does Abrams feel the need to shoehorn in the classic Trek group of 7 into a neat, two-hour origin story? Why does everyone have to know everyone else before "Where No Man Has Gone Before"? And if the franchise does have to go down that road, there are missed opportunities taking place. How cool would it have been to learn that Abrams and Orci/Kurtzman were including Gary Mitchell in the original crew and that Spock's tinkering with the timeline meant that maybe history as we knew it in the original series would unfold differently? Wouldn't it be cool to left excited about seeing Chris Pine's Kirk starting his five year mission and not knowing if Mitchell would die shortly into it? How would that affect the dynamic between Kirk and Spock? It opens the door for huge possibilities and it also means that the unknown future can roll out in any way. Maybe it's Scotty that dies sacrificing his life to save the Enterprise in the guts of V'Ger. Maybe Sulu gets promoted and moves on to his own command. Maybe the Genesis Device trilogy unfolds a different way and open war results between the Klingons and the Federation. Somehow I get the sense that this isn't going to be the direction that Abrams' Trek is headed. This is going back to the well and keeping within the borders of what worked before, albeit with a massive upgrading to the look and budget.
I just think that this franchise could have been rebooted and made relevant for today's audience who doesn't know the difference between a Horta and an Andorian and those geeks that know and love the mythology of what's come before. I'd love to be proven wrong when May 09 comes around but...I just haven't seen that yet in the footage or rumors about the story.
Comment #3 (Posted by oslowe)
nice one, sir.
Comment #4 (Posted by Matt)
I think dismissing TNG is wholly retarded. DS9 was about as good as TREK ever got storywise. For the most part Voyager and Enterprise were complete trash. But, TNG will always be my favorite simply because while I liked the original series and the original cast, they never, NEVER seemed like the type of people that should be our emissaries to the stars. TNG at least had a semi-professional crew and a Captain who commanded respect. I never respected Kirk. He was either off trying to fuck everything, fingering Tribbles or arguing with his staff or trying to find a new and ever more ridiculous reason to take off his shirt. Let's not forget that there is a brilliant comedy to be had based on Starfleet Academy and the terror of being assigned to an asshat like Kirk's ship where sudden and unremarkable death were nearly assured. Picard on the other hand I would follow anywhere. He seemed to give a crap if his red shirts came back alive and he was intelligent, thoughtful and altogether the opposite of Kirk. At that point, that was a good thing.
But, I'm very glad to see you display your inner fanboy, Devin. I look forward to taking the piss out of you on a regular basis whenever you decide to piss on the fanbases of other shows and movies.
Except, "Twilight" Fuck those people.
Comment #5 (Posted by nice article, dev)
I dislike all things Star Trek. Except for Wrath of Khan. That movie is fucking awesome. Blindingly awesome.
Comment #6 (Posted by Jonathan Frakes)
You're still an asshole, Devin.
Comment #7 (Posted by Chris)
C'mon, DS9 was great, esp. with Ron Moore at work.
Comment #8 (Posted by Vulcan Death Grip)
Nice article, Devin.
Comment #9 (Posted by Remembers when Star Trek Returned)
Live long and prosper, little Devin. I'm not a serious trek fan, but I understand what's so special about the show, how it questions man's place in the universe, explores the unknown, etc... You won't find that on network tv outside of Lost these days. That's why i don't understand why some don't like Abrams being given the new Trek. He's shown already that he's capable of popular smart sci-fi. And I like to think of trek as having no limits, like batman... Kirk is my favorite captain because he's a natural leader. My own experience taught me that having that ability to motivate such different people, get them to work together, isn't something that can be easily taught... So I agree with Abrams on why Kirk is the captain instead of Spock.
Comment #10 (Posted by atinyspeckofdust)
C'mon Dev - sing it - row row row your boat, gently down the stream - it's the greatest moment in all the films...admit it... Shatner found God in part V - the holy trinity of Spock, Bones, and Kirk singing a children's song around the fire...we laugh with them, we cry with them, we're sitting right there singing with them... pure poetry...
Comment #11 (Posted by Splatoon)
What Matt said, with emphasis and gusto. TNG 4 life!
Comment #12 (Posted by Brocktoon)
"I had to clear the aisle so that what appeared to be a 700 pound Klingon could get through." And thus, Devin's relationship with Harry Knowles was born.
Comment #13 (Posted by Let the love flow)
Holy crap - you were Anton Chigurgh Jnr. Look at that mop.
Comment #14 (Posted by eric)
Axis & Allies, that brings back memories.
Comment #15 (Posted by slippy)
Good article.
1) Watching the previews, I too wonder if they get Gene's thematic idea of "Wagon Train to the Stars" that he originally had for Star Trek. (Damn, Joss Whedon took that seriously).
2) Devin, you can totally pick up a set of all 9 movies at Best Buy for, like, $25. Watching number V again recently, it's really not as bad as I remembered. Granted, if anyone else had been in the room, maybe I would have been embarrassed to admit that I was enjoying it.
3) super-dorks at a Con should NEVER be a traumatic experience. They exist to remind us, "I may be a bit of a fanboy...but at least I'm not that guy".
Comment #16 (Posted by Patrick Stewart)
All I care is... is there any nudity in it?
Comment #17 (Posted by Smaros)
Not to rub it into your face or anyone elses, but good on me for never liking Star Trek. That way I can skip giving a shit about connotations / subtexts and actually look forward to a movie that looks interesting.
Also, note that it could be worse., Devin. It could have been written by Diablo Cody. (I don't care if my opinion coincides with the anti-hype surrounding her, I still think Juno is overrated and dialogue-wise on par with a menstruating Kevin Smith out to annoy the shit outta me.)
Comment #18 (Posted by Random McAhole)
I love the original series. But I also love TNG. Back in 87 when I heard that the new show wouldn't feature the orignal cast I was pissed off. But in terms of modifying and modernizing and older show, few come to mind that come close to what TNG did.
Comment #19 (Posted by David Banner)
The thing is while DS9 was pretty good (especially in seasons 5 & 6), it wasn't very Star Treky. It lost the essential optimism of the earlier shows.
Comment #20 (Posted by Red Shirt Away Team Member 5)
You shouldn't tell the kids to steal books from the Library. Very non-starfleet, Cadet Devin.. Library books are for everyone to share. Please return them and pay your late fees, then you can get the new plastic card to replace your old laminated one. Awwwwww, how cute was Devin when he was wee? Very cute indeed. Thanks for sharing.
Comment #21 (Posted by Joe)
DS9 > all other Trek
Comment #22 (Posted by Yaranereg)
Kirk was always the man. Plowing his way through space-bitches, killing Klingon bastards, and if he couldn't win a fight fairly, he had no qualms about fighting dirty. TNG always pissed me off because everyone was such a pussy. "Oh no! Worf is sad because we forgot his birthday!" Who gives a shit!? Just kill or fuck something already!
Comment #23 (Posted by BurmaShave)
You need to get back into The Next Generation. Picard is the best captain the franchise will ever have.
Comment #24 (Posted by Devin's a A Fag)
Wow! Look at the mooks!
Comment #25 (Posted by DAVE)
Devin sure likes writing about himself. For a fuck as fat and ugly as him, he sure is a narcissist.
Comment #26 (Posted by Ixion28)
Not only do you almost perfectly describe (and often mirror) my own experiences and opinions about ST past and future, you've also turned out a really fine piece of writing, the kind that the internet is so not well-known for. Bravo, sir.
Comment #27 (Posted by Wrath)
"All of the destiny bullshit has no place"
Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan: "If I may be so bold, commanding a starship is your first, best destiny. Everything else is wasted material."
Comment #28 (Posted by Magic Kenny)
Nice write up from a non-apologetic trekker - but the dick in the middle of the birthday cake is giving me the heebie jeebies.
Comment #29 (Posted by Peter Judson)
And Lou Reed is eyeing it with a cerain intensity he used to reserve for a cooking spoon of diet pills. In fact, everyone at the table is eyeing that cake cock.
Comment #30 (Posted by Lard)
DS9 was the best.
Comment #31 (Posted by Star Trekkin Across the Universe)
It is so reassuring to see that there are so many other folks who acknowledge how genuinely great Deep Space Nine was. The first two seasons were a bit shaky, as crew did double duty on Next Gen. But once TNG went off the air, DS9 just soared, and kept getting better and better every season. Personally, I wonder why no one thought to bring Ira Steven Behr back into the fold for Enterprise. It's clear to me he was the Nick Meyer of DS9.
Where all other Star Trek series were essentially a collection of short stories starring the same characters, Deep Space Nine was like a long, complex novel. And it took patience and attention to appreciate its slow burn and multi-layered storylines. But man, when every single plotline came to a head in the sixth season, and the last season and a half was essentially the shit hitting the fan... as someone said above, it was as good as Star Trek ever got.
That said, the first six movies remain, for me, the best Star Trek anywhere, and I gotta admit my love for Star Trek seriously waned in the wake of Voyager, Enterprise, and a series of godawful Next Gen movies.
There are certain touchstones one can point to and say "Star Trek was about to die... and then THAT happened and redefined the franchise, thereby saving it."
Wrath of Khan is one.
- Voyage Home is another.
- Best of Both Worlds was a third.
- Had DS9 been more popular, it might be pointed to as well, but as it stands, few probably would.
- Enterprise had the potential to be one, but it was a massively wasted opportunity.
- but JJ Abrams' new movie is looking to be another such touchstone, and in spite of what look to be violations of canon, I too feel the swell of Trekkie pride return once more!
If anyone can bring Trek back from the dead, I have no doubt JJ's the guy.
Comment #32 (Posted by devins small baby penis)
hi devin, can you change your underwear this month? it getting really stinky in here. what happened to the gay guy that you used to pay to wipe your butt? you didn't eat him like the last one I hope.
Comment #33 (Posted by lyttleton)
The last two seasons of DS9 were probably the best seasons of any iTrek series (though admittedly, the finale was subpar). I think DS9 mixed the adventure and fun of the original series with the practicality and (realitve) realism of TNG.
Just my thoughts.
Comment #34 (Posted by scz)
I too love DS9. I like TNG as well. And the original Trek was what got me into it all. Voyager and enterprise were abortions.
Comment #35 (Posted by an unknown user)
Wow, Terry Farrell has a lot of entries on nudography.com!!!!!!!
Comment #36 (Posted by Steve Weintraub)
This essay kept leading up to a thesis that never materialized. In short, we're left with 15 paragraphs of navel-gazing.
The photo is cool, though.
Comment #37 (Posted by Yaranereg)
They guy behind Devin in that pic looks like he just smoked a big bowl of dope.
Comment #38 (Posted by Owain Wilson)
Anything with Star Trek in the title that doesn't star Shatner, Nimoy and Kelly is unspeakably dull.
Comment #39 (Posted by Sean)
The human adventure is just beginning.
Comment #40 (Posted by Red Shirt #3)
Wow Devin, this felt like I was reading my own autobiography. Right on down to stopping at First Contact in terms of watching Trek movies. The only thing I take issue with is your comment that the original TOS actors were not that great. If that were the case, then those characters would not be the icons they are today, and Trek would have gone the way of Lost in Space. I also differ with your view on the new movie. Although a lifelong fan, I have no interest in adherence to canon. I've been waiting for a more fun, vibrant, energetic Trek and this appears to be it. Paramount has shit on this franchise for so long that we should be thankful they are spending some cash and allowing someone to take it in a different direction.
Comment #41 (Posted by Rotten666)
WPIX....man that takes me back. The thanksgiving monster movie marathon is one of my favorite memories of growing up. Tomorrow I'm gonna wake up and watch the '33 king Kong.
Comment #42 (Posted by an unknown user)
Homo says "what?"
Comment #43 (Posted by Tommy Tribble)
I'm sorry, but DS9 was the most boring out of the Treks...although I never watched Enterprise. Even Voyager was better. Actually, I don't know what everyone's problem with Voyager is. It was a great show! Original series and TNG were better, but Voyager was WAY better than DS9. DS9 is televised Nyquill.
Comment #44 (Posted by Colonel Glen Manning)
When you wrote about watching the shows on WPIX and the Mego dolls, I cried. :*( Shit, did you have the bridge play set? Oh, and it's true the the only reason for the mainstream appeal of Star Trek is the chemistry between the three main original actors, and that the Abrams thing will be a fascinating train wreck.
Comment #45 (Posted by Kevski)
Nice article - and quite brave, baring your vulnerable side to a bunch of rabid talkbackers! Enough with the FINAL FRONTIER bashing though - Laurence Luckinbill was fantastic in that movie, bringing some real gravitas and pathos to Sybok, and there's some great banter between the big three - they really come across as almost family in that movie (loving the shore leave scenes). Yes, we could live without Uhura's nekkid dance (*shudder*) and Scotty knocking himself out on a gantry beam, but all in all - not a bad movie. And meeting God at the end - is that not the kind of epic plot we always wanted from TREK? The MOTION PICTURE - now that was some boring shit. Great in places, but generally too slow and ponderous.
Still don't buy Pegg as Scotty - he sounds too much like Merry from LOTR in the trailer! - but that reboot (yes it IS a fucking reboot) looks and sounds fun enough to be given a watch. Don't you DARE be ashamed, Dev. Bare your geekness - be PROUD!!!
Comment #46 (Posted by the sea captain)
Some fucking amazing hair in your family dude.

