WHAT WILL TWILIGHT DO?
- By Russ Fischer
- Published 11/18/2008
- News

There are a lot of us who can't wait for this week to be over. By Monday the question of whether or not Twilight will actually break out a magic spinning wheel to turn the obsessed shrieks of teen girls into gold will more or less be answered. Although I'm actually on the verge of becoming fascinated with the topic. So many elements have come to the foreground recently: midnight shows are selling out at an absurd pace; Summit has formally announced the acquisition of rights for books two through four; screenwriter (and Dexter staff writer) Melissa Rosenberg is tagged to adapt novels two and three; and, of greater import, director Catherine Hardwicke has said that this movie will have to make $150m to finally greenlight a sequel. Right now, having to wonder if you've got a job come Monday must suck.
All of which boils down to: Summit knows they've got something big, but they're not really sure how big, Will wild, easily exaggerated and internet-based mother/daughter fandom actually translate into dollars? Can a recent addition to the vampire-lit canon, backed by an indie studio and featuring no big stars, do even a smidgen of The Dark Knight's business? Can Summit actually read $60m out of the current tracking ($40m seems more likely, and even that still feels like hope) and actually stake anything on it? (Fandango reports 500 midnight sellouts and 200 others, and MovieTickets reports 400 sellouts; I'm not certain whether any of their data overlaps.)
I also love that Robert Pattinson is becoming the Sarah Palin of the Twilight campaign. He's a poster child, a rallying point and a lens through which a massive cadre of fans can focus their fantasies. And yet he seems on the outside of it, disinterested in, and perhaps even scornful of the core appeal. As The Playlist transcribed from an E! Online piece: "This woman is mad," Pattinson says. "She's completely mad and she's in love with her own fictional creation." But he's happy to have his own songs in the film, and must be thrilled with it as a launching pad, for now.
Look at it this way: if the film is a hit, we'll get a sequel with werewolves and lyanthrope transformation scenes, even though they're not likely to be a patch on American Werewolf. And we'll get the further adventures of a 108-year old guy perving on high school girls. That, I'll admit, keeps me laughing every time I read a story about screaming teens and their enabler moms.
OK, fine, I have to see the film in less than 24 hours and I'm just trying to psyche myself up.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Dick Cheese)
If this movie were about a crime-fighting robot, or a crime-fighting demon, or some shit, you queefs would be jizzing yourselves. Fuck off.
Comment #2 (Posted by Loccus)
I wish Half Blood Prince was still being released this November to watch it completely decimate this tween crap at the box office. Now we will have giggling girls seeing this movie 10times in theatres, turning it into an undeserved box office success.
Comment #3 (Posted by coolbrick)
This will be big. I work at a book store and if the movie is anything like the promos show it to be. Teen girls, homos, and lonely women(single women too) eveywhere will turn out. That isn't counting the dates they bring. Plus this mainly a wb crowd so the teen girls will see it three times each. Titiantic figures? Probally not. But I would bet on an easy 50 mil opening.
Comment #4 (Posted by MightyMouse)
Dick Cheese makes a valid point. Heaven forbid that a studio might make a stupid genre film that isn't aimed at emotionally stunted manchildren.
Comment #5 (Posted by Mercury318)
This movie looks to be the absolute garbage we all read when we were twelve (at least those of us with vaginas) and I will totally see it. Did you read that interview with Stewart where she politely says they're all crazy fuckers and her character is awful and Pattinson scares her? That SOLD me on this movie.
Don't read the follow up with Pattinson. Makes him less crazy and more VERY STUPID.
Comment #6 (Posted by Adam)
If any Harry Potter fans over 10 years old object to the success of this movie, please feel free to go and have your genitals professionally removed. It's not like you're using them, anyway.
Comment #7 (Posted by Big Pointy Teeth)
......Yawn. From the trailers this looks quite bad. Poor wire work.Like an emo Lost Boys rehash. I actually liked PAttison as Percy in Goblet of Fire but now I allI think of him is "Fuckface". I think I will wait till I can watch "Let the Right One In" instead. I wish I had a Flux-Capacitor so I skip past all this shit.
Comment #8 (Posted by Tyler Foster)
To all those, like Dick Cheese, who are angry that internet fanboys would hate on something directed at women: I'm pretty sure they are bitter and hateful about everything else too, so it's not like this is a change of pace. My hope is, I seem to remember Sex and the City being estimated low despite sellout numbers, and then it was a big hit. Hopefully the inverse is about to happen to Twilight. Because while I can avoid socialite fashion gossip shit, I can't avoid tween shit.
Comment #9 (Posted by Jmacq1)
I find the dichotomy kind of interesting: This site ran a piece rather politely (for here) explaining that movies could be a success despite not being geared towards the average demographic that peruses this site right around the time "Sex and the City" hit theaters.
But for this particular film, we get "Fuck This Face I and II."
Is it because this film professes to cross over into the fantasy/horror genre that the seeming double-standard exists? If this were just some teen drama with all the fantastical stuff excised, would anyone on this site or reading it even care enough to hate it?
I don't know much about this series and I'm not seeing the movie, I'm just curious as to why one movie that's not really "aimed" at us gets a pseudo-defense and another gets a shotgun blast of hate.
Comment #10 (Posted by Dude)
Re: Jmacq1. I think it gets the hate because it's an extremely watered down version of a genre film that's going to make lots of money even though it looks like crap. It has no effect on my life at all, but it's really really funny to see people get so bent out of shape over it.
Comment #11 (Posted by Par for the Intercourse)
It may well be not very good, but the seething rage is due to the fact that it is a genre film that isn't being marketed to virginal white males who will die alone.
Comment #12 (Posted by Buford The Sly)
Well at $9 a ticket this thing will make $150 million in like two hours. So get ready for more of this.
Comment #13 (Posted by Vampyros Lesbos)
This movie has AWFUL wire work. I don't think the fans will care. The "effects" in general look like shit. I don't think the fans will care. The acting is ATROCIOUS. Pattinson is every bit the TOOL that CHUD has proclaimed. Kristen Stewart is the worst actor on the planet, constantly sighing and blinking her eyes so much I thought she had Tourette's syndrome - not to mention, she's ugly. (Why didn't they make her hot, like some of the other vampire chicks?) I don't think the fans will care. The script is RIDICULOUS. The fans already know that, and they don't care.
As one woman said at a recent Rob Pattinson mall appearance, Screw the QnA, we just want to look at you.
Count on many tickets sold, as tweens bring their friends, wiccans bring their enchanted lovers, emo boys bring themselves and single women bring their cats. Count on sequels. Maybe with the money they make they can invest in better effects (both practical and digital).
Comment #14 (Posted by WobblyBob)
The sole reason this movie keeps getting coverage is because it attracts lots of lovely hits from angry teen girls. That's why Nick did TWO pointless blogs on the subject, that's why they got center space on the front page and that's why the widely despised talkback function was reinstated. I thought it was pretty obvious - CHUD desperately needs more hits.
Comment #15 (Posted by an unknown user)
Ghey.
Comment #16 (Posted by Dave)
Fuck Anne Rice and her bullshit vampire novels for creating the atmosphere that allowed some Mormon mom who wasn't getting it enough to create this kind of vampire bodice-ripper crap that now goes up on screen to the screams of pre-teens who don't know better and pathetic moms who do.
Fuck this shit. If there was any justice, these fools would get locked in a theater and forced to watch Near Dark, Black Sunday and Shadow of the Vampire in constant rotation. And if I see that damn commercial one more time I swear I am going to put a sledgehammer through the television set.
Comment #17 (Posted by F. Jackie Abraham)
This film is G-A-Y! The vampires look G-A-Y! If you see it it will most likely turn you G-A-Y! Semen drinking vampires with no fangs seem very emasculated and well, G-A-Y! What happened to angry blood thirsty undead fiends that would tear people's throats out?
Comment #18 (Posted by BeelzeBub42)
it will reach 350 mill. not because everyone will watch it like the dark knight, but because the same people will watch it over and over like titanic
Comment #19 (Posted by JRyan)
I think I'm starting not to hate that face so much anymore... Now it's that hair... That hair... FUCK THAT HAIR!!! So you're an immortal bloodsucker whose seen centuries pass by and THAT is what you do to yourself? Geez. You deserve the Dawson's Creek rejects, then. Damn, dude.
Comment #20 (Posted by BUBBLES)
Dang those Vampires are sexy.
Comment #21 (Posted by Soup)
Twilight is Abstinence Propaganda. Nobody fucks each other until they are In Love and Married. Book 4 has Fuckface and Bella boning on their Honeymoon like Klingons. I wonder how they'll film the Baby-Bloodily-Busting-Out-Like-A-Little-Demon scene that pissed so many fans off for being too gross?
Comment #22 (Posted by an unknown user)
I accidentally myself all over Pattison's face.
Comment #23 (Posted by LOL)
Twilight is even better because Nick doesn't like it.
Comment #24 (Posted by Ejoiner)
I work at a high school. This movie is going to be huge opening weekend. Every female within a bajillion mile radius has read, re-read and re-re-read the books and they are all fanatical about seeing the movie. Possibly many, many times. IF it gets really bad word of mouth it might tapper off pretty quick but I predict a ginormous opening at least.
Comment #25 (Posted by Mike)
It's gonna be huge. You know it, I know it. Everyone knows it. Will it be good? Does that even matter? I mean, for a a lot of us, it does, but to the studio, and to be sure, much of the target audience who, at their age, quality control is not really a factor, it doesn't matter. Fox has been salivating at having there own Harry Potter-esque franchise. (See: The Seeker, Eragon flameouts ) Now they have it. Only difference is that Warners - probably by contractual obligation with Rowling - made sure it was being done right. A-list directors, solid scripts, cream of the crop actors. With Harry Potter they get Alfonso Couron. With Twilight we have the director of The Nativity Story and Lords of Dogtown. I think that pretty much says it all.
Comment #26 (Posted by denny)
Really? This isn't a genre film? This isn't a love story infused with people with unnatural powers backed by shitty tween music? Man I must have been watching the trailer for Blood and Chocolate/Dracula 2000/Queen of the Damned/Underworld. My bad!
Comment #27 (Posted by That Guy)
Did everyone forget Bolt comes out the same day? The kids, Miley Cyrus fans and Disney freaks will flock to see this. I'm predicting Twilight opens #2 and all Twilitards will be enraged at children stealing Meyer's cold hard cash.
Comment #28 (Posted by Lima Oscar Lima)
It does not matter to the tweens if this movie sucks in the slightest. It's another example of the "Titanic Effect". It's simply a case of little Goth girls and boys begging mom and dad for money to support repeated viewings. I can hear it now... "MOM! Simply EVERYONE is going to see it! If I don't go, I'll be even MORE persecuted at school than I am now... and I'll attempt suicide for the 7th time!". Seriously... I would have epic joygasms if this film came in second to "Bolt"... and then word of a sequel would not vanish, but instead go direct to video, which is where fail of this magnitude should rightly go.
Comment #29 (Posted by an unknown user)
I want to forcibly insert my phallis into Robert Pattinson's vagina.
Comment #30 (Posted by BRENDOR)
This movie will be big, but not as big the studio is hoping for. It will not get TDK numbers due to the fact that it does not have a universal appeal. If you look at any of the big money makers past, present and future you'll see that they made a lot of money because all demos enjoyed the movie.
Your average movie-goer will probably be turned off by the film because of it's shoddy production work. Face it, when you look at the trailers you can tell that it's B-level work due to it's bad wire work and bland cinematography. Film is a visual medium and an audience, whether sophisticated or not, knows when they see good work because it immerses them into the film instantly. From what I've seen so far, Twilight does not have that WOW factor that draws in outsiders.
Twilight is very similar to High School Musical in a sense that it only shoots for the teenage and tween market. Both series I really don't get.
Before I get a shit storm of comments from all the fans, reasons like above DO matter when it comes to bringing in fans who don't really know or care about a vampire love story. I think if you want an idea of how the public views vampire-themed movies, look at HBO's True Blood. HBO was really hoping for another Sopranos but it looks like they won't get it because the show just ain't that grand. At the end of the day, I think that Twilight will do Underworld numbers.
And fellas, let's quit trash talking about the series. For the past ten years we've gotten to see X-men, Spiderman, a new Batman Franchise, LOTR, Harry Potter, Star Wars and a ton of other series that appeal to men. Let the ladies have this one.
Comment #31 (Posted by Cleo)
The suggestion that TDK was 'one for the boys' and that this is the film for girls to see is crazy. Did we like, hop back a century. I fucking loved TDK, and this film looks like a bad version of a below average book. But hey, I'm a skirt, so I'll be seeing it 8 times opening weekend I guess *yawn*.

