JOHN HILLCOAT FACES A BUMPY ROAD
- By Russ Fischer
- Published 10/16/2008
- News

We've been openly fascinated with John Hillcoat's adaptation of Cormac McCarthy's novel The Road since day one. The book, harrowing and quietly breathtaking, seems like a perfect fit for the sensibilities of the man who directed the excellent outback western The Proposition. Add Viggo Mortensen and a well-regarded but relatively unknown child actor as a father and son trying to survive in barren post-apocalyptic America, set it to music by Nick Cave, and it's not unfair to hope for magic.
But John Hillcoat may be the one needing a special touch now. Rumors have been rampant for some time that the film was being pushed back from a planned November opening, and now THR corroborates them, saying that the film has 'quietly' been moved back to December, perhaps even next year, while describing the current cut as 'decidedly not done'. The trade says a Thursday meeting will decide the film's place on the calendar.
That explains why Dimension tested the film this evening. One of our daily messageboard posters, Kabong, attended that screening of The Road, and reported dire results to our boards before emailing me further detail.
...it was just a complete mess…the film never pretends to be interested in its opaque story, replacing what I assume would be literary details with bleak, miserablist [sic] moments edited together randomly, none feeling like they emerged from the same film. It might just be unadaptable, because after the first twenty minutes the rest of the film is a crushing bore of a foregone conclusion- I think you can all guess what happens to the one character who mysteriously coughs all the time.
The focus group I attended railed against the repetitive score, which was probably temp but sounded like a minimalist new Nick Cave score that was heavy on the piano and droned through the heavily dramatic moments.
There's no "movie" there. The main crux- that Earth has fallen into a post-apocalyptic wasteland- is dealt with pretty vaguely, enough to the point where there's really no allegorical parallel at all, and as far as intimate post-apocalyptic movies, they tend to be similar, in that they involve lots and lots of walking until someone important dies, and that seems to be the formula this follows. The focus group also tore into Charlize Theron's flashback role as Viggo's estranged wife, who comes across as a screaming harpy with only a couple of minutes of screentime who unpleasantly ditches the family for no explicit purpose, as well as Michael K. Williams' role as the only black man in the film, a guy who robs the hero and ends up humbled and without his clothes- cries of racism, as you could guess.
Product placement abounds as well, to a distracting level. Apparently there is a Coca Cola scene in the book, but in the film it plays like a separate commercial, as Viggo gives his son his first Coke. The boy remarks at how fizzy and delicious it is and the dad lets him finish it on his own as the child asks, "Is that because it's the last one I'll ever have?"
Harvey Weinstein was at the screening, and he left early- whatever that means, I'll leave to the pundits. But not only is the film unfinished for its supposed November release date, it's also a complete fiasco on every creative level.
At least one potential big problem -- the unexplained post-apocalyptic setting -- is part and parcel of the book, and a key issue to tackle in cracking it for the screen. Many of these other issues, also things that are taken directly from the page, can likely be addressed in the editing room, and perhaps with some few reshoots, though I'd expect the latter to be a last-ditch effort. I am curious about the score, as the work Nick Cave and Warren Ellis did for The Proposition and The Assassination of Jesse James... was equally minimal and repetitive, though no less excellent for it.
This story has more layers involving Harvey Weinstein. There's been a massive conflict behind the scenes of the Weinsten Company film The Reader. The troubled Weinstein Co. needs a big film and, hopefully, a strong awards contender. Weinstein pushed Reader director Stephen Daldry into finishing the film this year when Daldry and producer Scott Rudin both wanted to take more time. In the end, Rudin walked away from the picture last week, asking that his name be removed, while Harvey ponied up extra money for Daldry to oversee round the clock edits to get the film finished for a fall/winter open.
The Dimension-distributed The Road could have been backup Oscar bait for Harvey, especially given that it is a Cormac McCarthy project, and therefore related to Best Picture winner No Country For Old Men. (Also produced by Scott Rudin.) That is, if the film was finished, or even finishable, and able to open by December. Nothing we're hearing makes that sound feasible. I'll be very curious to hear what comes out of the Thursday meeting, and I'm now afraid that The Road will get the famous February Weinstein dump next year. I hope it doesn't deserve it.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by messi)
never trust focus groups. some of them want a 3 act structure and can't understand a song that isn't verse, verse, chorus, verse, chorus, out. we need more experimentation and 'art'. Also repetetive score? Nick Cave on Jesse James produced one of the great scores of the decade. Even though it's not the same(this one was rallied against) Batman Begins had people indifferent to the score(incidently only those who watched it once) but now after being seen many times it's held in high regard and dark knight only reinforced it. Molossus is the greatest hero theme there is. It sounds like the definition of 'unstoppable'. I;'m tired.
Comment #2 (Posted by Dick Cheese)
Fuck that focus group. Folks, this is a fucking POST-NUKE FLICK with CANNIBALS. Not liking this is akin to being a Communist. Or Devin.
Comment #3 (Posted by Baby on a Spit)
I've seen the same cut that was previewed in NYC today, and the film is not nearly in as bad a shape as Kabong is making it out to be. There are definitely scenes and maybe sequences that could be improved and reworked in the editing room, but the film far from "a mess." Anyone who has seen "The Proposition" knows that this director makes deliberately paced, thoughtful movies, not always designed to pandered to the lowest common denominator. The movie is trying to be what the book was, which was quiet and brutal and empty and tragic, not a Hollywood style post-apocalyptic chase movie. This is not and will not be "I Am Legend."
Comment #4 (Posted by Vern)
Except for the part about Charlize, all of that exactly describes the book. I didn't realize this was a Weinstein joint, that's bad news because they are the type of dipshits who will listen to this guy. Imagine a focus group discussing Josh Brolin's fate in No Country For Old Men, they would call that a "disaster" too, guaranteed. It's not like this story could ever be turned into Pirates of the Carribean. This can only be an art movie. You could make the movie this guy wants and I'd go see it but you'd be a huge asshole if you still called it The Road.
Comment #5 (Posted by This Cake Is TERRIBLE)
I remember that Jesse James was a movie that suffered from focus group trouble as well, and that movie is a damn masterpiece. Also, the Nick Cave & Warren Ellis score is the thing about this movie that I'm looking forward to the most, so I really hope it's not "repetitive". The fact of the matter is, the book has no real coherent story, it is just random events as the father and son travel through post-apocalyptic america, so maybe the biggest problem here is that the film is just too faithful. Not that I would mind, but I suppose "Joe Six Pack" and his brother, "Joe the Plumber", might not respond well to this.
Comment #6 (Posted by FUCK FOCUS GROUPS)
FUCK FOCUS GROUPS ....... "If anyone here is in marketing or advertising...kill yourself." - Bill Hicks
Comment #7 (Posted by BurmaShave)
"miserablist" "minimalist" This word you say, I do not think it means what you think it means.
Comment #8 (Posted by Kabong better not read the book)
I echo Vern's comments. Kabong just described exactly how the story in the book is written. I even found the wife in the book to be a bit of a harpy, although this was understandable given her feelings of hopelessness (the reason for her abandonment isn't ever explained in the book either, although it can be inferred that she doesn't see the point of moving on for no benefit or purpose).
The beauty of the book is that it is incredibly minimalist yet behind the words there is so much unspoken emotion.
It is a bleak journey and there are very few "gotcha" moments. The issues Kabong raises, just means he wouldn't like the book either.
Frankly, despite how well written the book is, it is a tough book to read because it is really a very bleak story. I can't say I'm motivated to live through the story again on screen. It's definitely not one for the masses.
Comment #9 (Posted by Hippo-Eki)
I have to agree with most of the previous comments here. The Road IS a series of disjointed events that happen to these people traveling along the road to nowhere. That's all the overt narrative of the book is. Setting out to make a movie of this novel that would be anything else would be pointless. Also, every time I think of a film version of The Road I can't help but think that it must end up looking and feeling like Haneke's Time of the Wolf. The quiet desperation of the characters in that film is riveting. This too is certainly not a film for the masses.
Comment #10 (Posted by el ahim)
I have to agree with the other commenters--Kabong's description sounds exactly like the film that played in my head as I read the book.
I don't want 'em to 'flesh out' the disjointed and fairly vague tone of the book--it was obvious, to me, by the end of the book what had caused the apocalypse...tho I guess I could've been mistaken.
Comment #11 (Posted by Liked the Book)
Kabong's reaction makes sense considering he didn't read the book. I have and never thought this could be made into a film. The book is relentlessly bleak. Even in the few bright moments it's bleak. Showing this movie to a focus group of people who probably thought Transformers 'kicked ten kinds of ass' was a poor idea. And the wife was a bitch. Her abandonment wasn't unexplained. She saw no purpose in living in a hopeless world where she and her child would inevitably be raped and eaten, so she killed herself.
Comment #12 (Posted by Sounds to me like the reviewer didn't know th)
Reading Kabong's review, this film doesn't sound like a mess at all. It sounds like exactly what it should be - a series of post apocalyptic vignettes tied together loosely into a sad road movie. The book is a very convincing potrayal of a man at his wit's end, trying desperately to do SOMETHING when there is obviously nothing he can do to help himself or his family. It doesn't matter at this point what caused it or why, only that they keep moving and stay safe. This isn't a typical science fiction story. It doesn't bother with painting the bits of past glory of a world gone by. We live in the head of a dying man hellbent on getting his son SOMEWHERE safe. Again, it strikes me that Harvey Weinstein's absolutely NOT the right producer for this property. (Of course, I'm not sure really what Harvey is right for...besides pissing off audiences and filmmakers alike). However, I have real faith that John Hillcoat (even in this cut, maybe especially with this cut) will nail the milieu of the novel and pull off one hell of a bleak film. It's not supposed to end happily. And you know that while you read it or watch it...hence the hopelessness...this is an atheistic work of fiction. It takes the courage of an atheist to read or watch it. My two cents.
Comment #13 (Posted by Fan of book)
I have read this book about 5 times and everything I have read from the test screening is exactly is whats in the book. The coke scene is exactly like a commercial thats how the boy describes it. And "the character" that coughs constantly does it throughout the entire book. And with charlize therons scene; the mother in the novel is a bitch who abandons her family, thats the point she is careless and thinks of herself. I dont get it the book is very narrow and doesnt have a exact plot. They just walk thats the whole point of the novel. Who ever saw this test screening clearly did not read the book and doesnt know what they are talking about
Comment #14 (Posted by zombot)
did this guy even read the book? we all know dad is going to die. that's the POINT. the coke scene is THERE. the shrewd wife couldn't hack it and left and killed herself. IT'S ALL THERE. did this guy wnat things changed or OVERexplained? did he WANT some environmental or political statement as to what happened to the world? what an idiot. it sounds faithful, so now my only concern is how it looks.
it is very sad that the mood of the movie could be changed because of pre-screeners who expect a formula movie from a long, dreary, unconventional book.
Comment #15 (Posted by Gorodn)
You think Weinstein left the screening BECAUSE HE HAD ALREADY SEEN IT?
Jesus fucking Christ.
Comment #16 (Posted by Kabong hater)
Kabong is obviously a moron. The film may or may not be ready, all that aside, the only thing Kabong's report proved is that his opinion an not be relied on for informed response. He was obviously unfamiliar with the source material, went in expecting I am LEgend and is generally too dumb for anything that doesn't have explosions.
Comment #17 (Posted by Muzz)
I don't know how the kid's character is suposed to work if he's so old, without a subtantial rewrite. The kid in the book is about 5, tops. Give a ten year old that dialogue and characterisation and it won't ring true at all.
Comment #18 (Posted by Aeghast)
Dick Cheese, great comment ; )
Comment #19 (Posted by an unknown user)
Re: Muzz. I think that the kid is supposed to be 9 or 10 in the book. His dialogue is like that, because he hasn't gotten any education and had to live in really lousy conditions. Even the father has pretty limited vocabulary, because there isn't simply anything to talk about other than survival. Any kid who was born in those conditions would be somewhat under-developed.
Comment #20 (Posted by solartaco)
Any radioactive tits in this thing?
Comment #21 (Posted by b.m.negrotto)
i hope this just wasn't his cup of tea and not the mess he described. i do have my worries. Hillcoat's last film had its moments but was a mess and the score was garbage. i did see potential in the man and we all nick cave and warren ellis can make great music. please be wrong. please be wrong...
Comment #22 (Posted by Jack)
I've been waiting for the trailer...so i'm bummed but not surprised the movie's delayed. but to all the people who are assuming the disaster was nuclear, McCarthy inferred to Rolling Stone that it was perhaps "an impact event" that caused the devastation...we're not told what that shear of light and multiple concussive blasts were that started everything. there's no talk of radiation or nucleasr fallout, just dust, snow and rain.
Comment #23 (Posted by GumGum)
What's that? The sound of someone spectacularly missing the point. This sounds like a completely faithful interpretation of the book and I for one can't wait to see it.
And saying that just because the thief is played by a black actor makes the film racist is quite frankly downright irresponsible and makes it pretty easy to discount the rest of this idiots comments regarding the film.
Comment #24 (Posted by Screening Attender)
In a world where No Country wins best picture (that is to say, an awesome world), this film - in the form we were shown - could also be a serious contender. Release it as is, Harvey!!
Comment #25 (Posted by Laurie Mann)
Does anyone out there have any confirmation of the movie being delayed?
All I've seen are rumors confirming rumors - no announcement from the distributors. No date change (or date removal) from the official splash page for The Road. No date change on The Weinstein Company site.
Yeah, I know the marketing's been invisible. That's a bigger problem then one person completely not understanding the movie's test screening.
But the fact that there's still no formal word makes me wonder if there's not going to be any delay. Weinstein's other "award flick" for this year, The Reader, has had equally invisible marketing.
Laurie Mann
http://www.theroadrumors.com
Comment #26 (Posted by #1 Movie Critic)
I agree with Kabong. Give me "Beyond Thunder Dome," "Independence Day," or "I Am Legend" any day. And Viggo Mortensen? Give me a break! This movie should have starred Vin Diesel or the Rock and been scored by John Williams. This movie sounds too elitist and not mavericky enough for my taste.
Comment #27 (Posted by Total Awesomeness)
I can't really add to any of the comments. I can only agree that Kabong's review echoed the book perfectly. And the book was a fucking masterpiece. Beautifully bleak, with an ending built upon hope.
What a douche.
Comment #28 (Posted by heyheyjk)
Okay, #1 Movie Critic needs to change his name! Everyone one of the films you listed as preferable to "The Road" were awful. If those are the movies you truly like, you don't need to be a critic at all. I'm rereading the book now in anticipation of the film and can't wait to see what Hillcoat and Viggo are creating. As for all the walking in the book/movie, remember- it's not the destination, it's the journey - every bleak and beautiful step of it in this case.
Comment #29 (Posted by Corey)
I'm pretty sure that's called sarcasm, heyheyjk... I can't wait for this movie, this is absolutely my favorite book.
Comment #30 (Posted by dinkle)
Everyone makes a fair point BUT since when is it necessary to have seen the book before enjoying the movie. The movie should be good in its own right not just as a postscript to the book.
i hope the movie doesn't miss the fact that there is a decent element of horror in this book- starving bodies locked in a basement anybody?
First thing i thought was 'kid's too old!!!' though. Not a good detail to fuck up.

