ZACK SNYDER APPEARS TO HAVE NAILED WATCHMEN
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 10/2/2008
- News
I was sold after the set visit. I knew that Zack Snyder 'got' Watchmen, that he wasn't turning it into 300, that he and his team were paying an obsessive amount of attention to detail and fidelity. After talking to Zack on set (and at a couple of other events - I must have interviewed this guy about 20 times on the subject of Watchmen) I knew that he was attempting to service the graphic novel and not trying to bend it to his style or his will. I also knew that he wasn't just making a slavish adaptation - his film would attempt to live on its own.I was sold on the intentions and on the approach. My mantra was 'If Watchmen is bad it won't be due to a lack of love and effort.' My new mantra is 'Watchmen won't be bad.'
That's how good the 25 minutes that Snyder screened for the press was. From the scenes we were shown I feel comfortable saying that Snyder has nailed it. Watchmen looks amazing.
First we were shown the opening of the film, where a mysterious stranger breaks into the apartment of Edward Blake, aka The Comedian, and beats him to a bloody pulp before tossing him out of a window. Snyder has taken a couple of panels from the comic and expanded them, while using this opening as a way to let audiences into the film's alternate 1985 - Blake is watching The McLaughlin Report, where Eleanor Clift and Pat Buchanan debate recent Russian nuke build ups and military moves towards Afghanistan and how the presence of Dr. Manhattan affects the situation. President Nixon delivers a speech aimed square at the Soviets - do not fuck with America, or our big blue protector, is the gist of it.
Then the door breaks open as a Veidt Nostalgia commercial comes on the TV. The song Unforgettable plays over the brutal battle, amped up from the simple fisticuffs of the comic but still feeling in line with the source material. This is obviously a match between two incredibly skilled opponents, but the mysterious man is faster, quicker, and more brutal. Snyder uses speed ramping here, but it doesn't feel gimmicky or 'cool,' like it did in 300. It feels like a comic book.
One of the most interesting things I took from Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics was an appreciation for the strange way that comic books use time. Each panel captures a moment, and movement occurs in the gutter between panels, but there's no set rule for how that works - three panels can span a decade or a second. For the first time ever I felt like I was seeing that in action on a big screen. A punch lands and the film slows down to almost a full stop - there are elements of Raging Bull in the style but more than that it feels like way that a comic book panel will crystalize and hold a moment in time, making a split second turn into an eternity. Comic book filmmaking has been used to describe garish, four color imagery or ludicrous, campy content, but Snyder seems to be redefining that phrase, making a comic book film that captures the experience of reading a comic, of experiencing moments in time as unique entities.
After Blake slams into the pavement, followed soon after by his blood-spattered smiley face button, the film goes into its opening credits. Again, Snyder is taking frozen moments in time and bringing us through them, setting up living dioramas of important scenes in the history of the costumed heroes of this world. His camera glides through tableaus familiar - Dollar Bill dead, his cape caught in a revolving door - and new - the Enola Gay dropping the bomb on Hiroshima, except in this world Silk Spectre is painted on her nose - to the sounds of Bob Dylan's The Times They Are A-Changin'. Who would have imagined we'd live to see the day when a Bob Dylan song is the opening theme for a superhero movie?
The credits are pretty amazing, and they tell a complete story on their own, filling in some gaps that will either leave hardcore fans furious or exhilirated. I burst into laughter (the good kind) seeing Silhouette in Times Square on V-E Day grabbing a young girl and kissing her, making an alternate reality lesbian version of that famous picture of the girl and sailor kissing. I don't know that I would want to accept that moment literally - that instead of the girl and sailor photo a Silhouette and girl photo has become famous - but it puts the audience into the exact right frame of reference as to how these superheroes are part of the pop culture landscape, as does Andy Warhol unveiling a painting of Nite Owl II. And showing the Comedian as the shooter on the grassy knoll - something alluded to in the comic but never shown or spelled out - underscores the role they played in this alternate history. There's a lot to digest in the few short minutes of the opening credits, and I'm curious to see how virgin audiences will take to the sheer amount of information thrown at them in silent, often still scenes.
The next scene that Snyder showed was Dr. Manhattan going to Mars and looking back at his origin. During an interview at this year's Comic Con Snyder said this was his favorite part of the movie because it's the most Watchmen-esque segment - seemingly completely digressing from the main plot, but integral to understanding the characters.
Perhaps the biggest shock of this scene was learning that Billy Crudup's voice is totally unprocessed as Dr. Manhattan. Asked about it in the Q&A, Snyder said that he figured since Manhattan could do anything he would keep his voice normal so as to not freak people out, but also that Crudup's voice, which is so calm and soothing, would be freaky and perfect coming from this god.
I have to admit that I got goosebumps watching this segment. While Snyder cuts down on some of the time-hopping that Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons played with in the original comic (since Manhattan experiences all time at once, his 'memories' of his origin are very non-linear), this segment captures all of the important plot beats of Manhattan's origin, but more crucially the emotional beats. This ten minute segment is essentially an adaptation of one issue of the comic, and the fact that Snyder captures everything that he needs to capture in those ten minutes are the boldest testament to the fact that Watchmen is doable in a feature length film. Could this segment have been a 40+ minute episode of the mythical HBO series that fans have clamored for? Sure, but it works just as effectively in this format.
Where the opening scene was expanded from the comic, this scene was necessarily truncated. Still, Crudup's voice over captures so many of the specific lines from the comic that the experience feels complete. And even with some unfinished effects, Manhattan looks simply awesome - and fear not, there's big blue dick on display. Snyder et al have said again and again that it would be there, and now I can report back to you that it is in fact there, just not always so in your face.
The final full segment that Snyder showed was Silk Spectre II and Nite Owl II breaking into the rioting prison to spring Rorschach. Part of this, where Spectre and Nite Owl advance down a corridor, beating on inmates, happened to be what I saw getting filmed while I was on set, and it was thrilling to see it fully realized. On set I wondered how this would work - it's an extra action beat that's not in the comic, but one that feels natural to the story - and again Snyder uses the speed ramping technique to pull out and emphasize certain moments - a kick, a punch, an impact - although this time it does feel like it comes closer to the 'cool' visuals of 300. Still, it's a restrained bit of action in a film that will have very little of it.
I'm such a nerd that I noticed a small joke was cut during the end minutes of the scene; Spectre and Nite Owl find Rorschach, who is following the Big Figure into the bathroom. They wait outside, thinking Rorschach simply has to pee, and Dan's observation about using the bathroom as a crime fighter is missing. I don't know if this indicative of larger tonal issues - is Snyder looking to pull some of the humor out, thinking that it might take people outside the story? - but I will say that the joke being missing was one of my few complaints about the footage I saw.
This was the only real look we got of Rorschach in motion, and while I wish there was more of him, I liked what little there was. Jackie Earle Haley's voice and his delivery of Rorschach's stilted lines were perfect, as was the mask. The ink blots look like blood seeping through bandages, and the mask itself looks soft and moves easily when Rorschach speaks, unlike the Spider-Man mask, which obviously has a rigid structure underneath it.
After that we were treated to a quick montage, the vast majority of which was footage from the trailer. When that was over Snyder did a half hour Q&A; I filmed that and will be making the video available on the site starting later today (Thursday).
The film looks beautiful from a simple cinematographical point of view, but beyond that it looks thrilling and, for want of a better word, right. I think this is the film that will convince skeptics that they don't understand Zack Snyder, that his output so far has not defined him as a filmmaker in the ways they think it has. Yes, Snyder is a self-admitted non-naturalist, but his wildest instincts seem reigned in here. The film isn't endlessly stylish shots but seems to be made up of solid (and stylish) visual storytelling. And despite the fact that Snyder appears to have made an almost preternaturally faithful adaptation, the film doesn't feel slavish. It gets everything right while also being its own thing. Snyder hasn't simply dramatized the panels, he's created his own take on the material while sticking very close to what is on the page.
The film's current running time is two hours and forty five minutes, meaning that the 25 minutes I saw was a minor sampling. But based on what I saw, I have to say that I'm filled with nothing but confidence. Snyder did it. He didn't drown the movie in his style and he didn't allow the holy status of the text to intimidate him into being an anonymous filmmaker. I was hoping for a Watchmen movie that would be 'okay.' It looks like I'll have to settle for one that's great.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Mista Spock)
:-)
Comment #2 (Posted by Andrew)
Like you would say anything otherwise. This thing - sickeningly overexposed here.
Comment #3 (Posted by Scouse Ste)
Good article Devin, the more I see/read about this the more excited I get.
If it disappoints though I'm blaming you for getting my expectations up, not Snyder!
Comment #4 (Posted by Cititzen Kong)
Thank you for the insightful article and damn you for making me long to see this movie NOW even more than before.
Comment #5 (Posted by dbraun)
Excellent. I'm excited. I need to go read the graphic novel and see what this is all about.......... :)
Comment #6 (Posted by Empire Git)
I've been a comic book reader for years (not as much into mainstream comics as most) - have not read Watchmen yet (gasp!) - I'm finding it hard to make my mind up as to if i should read the G Novel before I see the film (there are pro's and cons to both options). Any thoughts?
Comment #7 (Posted by Soupdragon)
Sounds like Snyder's still on track with this. Thanks for the article.
Comment #8 (Posted by Slater)
Speed ramping got old about the time the first trailer to 300 came out. Having said that, sounds like Snyder has "got" it. Hopefully this report isn't coming from the perspective of a nerd whose just hyped to see beloved comic book property film footage early (The harry Knowles syndrome) and coming from someone whose being a little bit objective. The problem is, showing web journo's half decent footage and getting them to spout out hyperbole all over the internets, is as easy as ass raping a 16 year old teenager after slipping a mickey in her drink. That's right, I'm suggesting Snyder ass rapes teenagers in his spare time.
Comment #9 (Posted by JoNuggs)
Let's back up this wagon a bit. The CHUD curse could rear its ugly head.
I'm excited for the flick, but so very apprehensive. While I generally respect your opinion Dev, I'm still trying to temper my expectations and excitement.
Comment #10 (Posted by Definitely Not BobClark)
The CHUD curse? I thought that only applied to films like Slither, Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang, etc. Watchmen is getting hyped everywhere, its by no means a CHUD only thing, and the budget is probably 10x that of the other films, so I don't think you have anything to worry about, JoNuggs.
Comment #11 (Posted by Timothy225)
Excellent article, Devin - and I'm consumed with jealousy that you got to see the screening. I'm very pleased Snyder's doing a great job by the source material, and am more eager than before to see how the whole flick plays out.
Comment #12 (Posted by SleestackPenisToes)
Thanks for spoiling the first 25 goddamn minutes, Bottom Fat!! Stop eating and think for 2 seconds next time.
You're readers aren't morons, regardless of your low opinion of them.
Comment #13 (Posted by BobClark was not here...seriously!!)
What does this have to do with how large you are, my rotund ball of hair?
Go play Rock Band by yourself at a party and try to ignore them all laughing at you.
Except Andre, of course. He'll probably hold the guitar for you.
Comment #14 (Posted by Lucidz)
Jeez andrew, stop pissing in your own wheaties. The buzz on this has been positive everywhere. You're taking one of the most revered, famous graphic novels of history and making into a seemingly awesome flick. Why WOULDN'T the film community be excited about this. Most of them are, or were, geeks at some point...
Comment #15 (Posted by Kevin)
Sleestak, you can go read the graphic novel and spoil the whole thing for yourself. I encourage you to do it, even though, judging from your post, you wouldn't understand much of it because you're a fucking moron.
Comment #16 (Posted by Lard)
Bullshit - sounds like corporate brown tonguing in exchange for an early peek.
This movie shouldn't be made, Snyder is a hack who can't create anything oringinal and anyone with half a fucking brain knows it.
Comment #17 (Posted by Rob)
EMPIRE, I've been a comic fan for years and only recently read "Watchmen" (though I knew the popular characters and knew who the "bad guy" was), and I enjoyed the hell out of it. It was everything everyone says it is, but more. It's pretty f-ing spectacular.
Comment #18 (Posted by David)
I love CHUD but would someone please hire an EDITOR to tighten up these articles. They are unreadable!!! You can ask a writer to edit his/her own work but it's just a conflict of interest. Print Editors say give me 1000 words, give me 500 words-- that's not just because the paper was expensive, it's because it encourages decent writing.
Comment #19 (Posted by Kris)
Your enthusiastic commentary has greatly increased my confidence in this movie. (I was only tentatively excited before--now I'm really excited.)
A little technicality, but was Rorschach in costume in the prison? If so, I think that WILL bother me. (Plus I want to see the scene where he goes back to his apartment and confronts his landlady.)
Comment #20 (Posted by Beligerent Nerd)
I hope this isn't like Hellboy 2 where you get my hopes up and the finished product turns out to be a steaming pile of shit.
Comment #21 (Posted by mr_adam)
Totally hyped.
Comment #22 (Posted by Coswald)
"You're readers aren't morons, regardless of your low opinion of them." This from a guy called "SleestackPenisToes" who calls Devin "Bottom Fat" in the previous sentence like a fucking 2nd-grader.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE RE-REMOVE THE TALKBACKS. IT"S A SAFE-HAVEN FOR ANONYMOUS DOUCHEBAGS WHO NEED TO VENT ALL THE FRUSTRATION THEY STILL FEEL FOR GETTING BEATEN UP IN JUNIOR HIGH.
Comment #23 (Posted by Rotten666)
Why did you guys bring back comments? Some of the people who post here are some sad motherfuckers. And Empire Git...read the damn gn before you see the movie. The movie might be good, it might be bad, but it is not the original vision. No matter what it will just be an interpretation of Watchmen. Get reading! Now dammit!
Comment #24 (Posted by Junior Bird Man)
Junior High? Let me tell you Sonny Jim, I get beaten up to this day at my nursing home.
P.S. Watchmen looks awesome!
P.P.S. What's a graphic novel?
Comment #25 (Posted by Bungle)
So nice to see the Talkbacks back. Hurm.
Comment #26 (Posted by Frank)
Devin Faraci becomes like Harry Knowles the second he sees anything that caters to him or that he can be the contrarian defender of.
"The Wackness takes place in NYC in 1994? That's within the realm of my experience! MOVIE OF THE YEAR!"
Comment #27 (Posted by BOOM PING PING!)
Most keep reading ... despite ... insipid, bloated prose ... because ... subject ... is .... *VOMIT*
Evin, did Zack Snyder prefer jello or mayo when you tossed his salad?
Comment #28 (Posted by Paco Bell)
I like how Watchmen isn't getting the Dark Knight treatment. Article bitching about excessive marketing? Scratch. Article bitching about the running time? Scratch. Articles calling a film that hasn't been seen in its entirety 'not great'? On the contrary, with only 25 minutes, Watchmen is already there. I thought Chud was a place to avoid this hyperbolic fanboy bullshit...
Comment #29 (Posted by JediBobster)
Slowly getting more excited for this. Everything looks and sounds just right on this - but how many times does that happen? 2hrs 45? Yeah, that sounds about right. And YES Empire, read the Graphic Novel first. Enjoy the heck out of it, then enjoy the heck out the film.
Comment #30 (Posted by Fuzz)
I'm sorry, BPP, that you have a little dick.
Comment #31 (Posted by Michael)
You sick twisted sad people make me sick. you sit here and attack Zack Snyder for actually making the movie, when all you can do is write grade school level snide remarks on a message board. If you're all so fucking amazing, why not go write your own stories and make your own movie? oh, thats right, you don't have any talent either. I'm not saying that Zack is all that great, but at least he's doing something. He's doing something that most people, including some of you here I imagine, have said couldn't be done. He's making Watchmen. So why not grow up, grow some talent and actually do something rather than tear down someone else? No wonder Fox could give a fuck about you people....it's because there's no pleasing you. ever. Go ahead...call me names. tell me all about what a moron I am and call me things that would make an 8 year old giggle...you can't hurt my feelings. Why? because I don't give a fuck about you people either. You know what? I'm betting that Zack Snyder doesn't either. Neither does Michael Bay, Brett Ratner or McG (stupid fucking name) or any other of the targets you like to attack as hacks and worse.
Comment #32 (Posted by st)
"and fear not, there's big blue dick on display." I'm sure you're really excited for that, aren't you Devin? You fucking faggot.
Comment #33 (Posted by Mark)
I think this film would have benefitted from being co-directed by Paul Greengrass and Zack Snyder. Greengrass to do the actual directing and Snyder to chime in with an occasional reminder to not overdo the shakey cam.
Comment #34 (Posted by Brad)
Colour me excited for this. I simply don't get the mindset of someone who can proclaim Zack Snyder a hack after seeing two of his films (both completely different and very competently made). To those ragging on Snyder - take a long hard look at yourself. He's making the most anticipated film of 2009, while you're making ill-informed and infantile comments on a talkback. I'm sure he's not losing any sleep over it.
Comment #35 (Posted by Coswald)
And now we actually have someone calling Devin a "faggot." Please, for the love of all that is good, GET RID OF THE TALKBACKS. The message boards are just fine for shit like that, no?
Comment #36 (Posted by zzzzz)
what's with all the "get rid of the talkbacks" nonsense? you folks do realize that you're not *required* to read them, right?
some of us like being able to participate in the discussion without the hassle of going to the forums, finding the correct thread, etc.
Comment #37 (Posted by Coswald)
OK, then get rid of the talkbacks and provide hyperlinks to the correct thread on the boards. Easy peasy. And yes, I see the absurdity of continually posting "get rid of the postings." Especially since, as you say, we're not required to read them. But look above. For the most part (this conversation notwithstanding), there is no "discussion" here as you put it. It's all one-liners and potshots.
Comment #38 (Posted by the Lorax)
... these snozberries taste like snozberries...
Comment #39 (Posted by MAN)
Everyone likes the talkbacks because the forums are filled to the brim with douchebags. The only ones complaining about talkbacks are the douchebags from the forums.
Comment #40 (Posted by VaginaSleestackKneesandToes)
Devin is super heavy and bearded like a sad man on the highway I threw something at.
Comment #41 (Posted by AndyB)
It amazes me how many people have an opinion on this that haven't read the graphic novel. I read it when it first came out in TPB and was mildly dissapointed by the ending, then re-read it, got it more, then actually bothered to read all the end articles (Under the Hood etc) and finally GOT it, honestly it took about 5 reads to see why it was garnering so much praise. I've since read it so much my original copy has fallen to peieces and I had to buy another one.
Point being it looks like Snyder has done the same, everything that is important to making the Novel what it is (Under the Hood, tales from the black freighter) are there. That was my biggest fear of this film, that the nuanced stuff wouldn't be in it.
I also keep forgetting that half the people who write on these boards are about twelve years old and have no idea other than to have a potshot at Devin (who, although I'm sorry to say I think you have sold out a bit man, is still my fave reviewer on the site - although Nick seems to have come back from the wilderness of fear and loathing for everyone and everything and is churning out some good stuff)
Comment #42 (Posted by Coswaldlovespenis)
Coswald go back to the forums and quit yer chimp screamin!
Comment #43 (Posted by ennui)
glad to see the talkbacks here, for those of us without the time to wade through them, it is nice to be able to give an opion.
Comment #44 (Posted by Mik)
This movie looks too violent. i Think violent movies should be banned. I hope Fox wins its lawsuit and this movie is never released.
Comment #45 (Posted by Biggs)
Devin, you had me at "there's big blue dick on display"
Comment #46 (Posted by Alan Moore)
I will not be seeing this film.
Comment #47 (Posted by Adam)
Yes he nailed Watchmen. Just like any rapist nails someone. This time he just raped Alan Moore's intentions
Comment #48 (Posted by Talkback)
Wow. You fucktards are all focused on the big blue dick aren't you? You are all a bunch of fags for posting about the only thing you got from the whole article. Big. Blue. Dicks.
Fags.
Comment #49 (Posted by Richard Fannin)
So many egos concerning this obviously sycophantic article. Comic fans insulting other comic fans? Puppy fat and spelling mistakes? Please, you're all a stain on Watchmen, bickering about who has the bigger pair of male tits and who understands the comic more. I know every one of you think your caustic little view of things matters to people, but it doesn't. Mine doesn't. I read it when I was a young child, before the web and before these squalls of hate and loathing about who knows best. That's insecurity people. The film cannot be as good. It won't be. The hilarious thing is that Alan Moore would find all of you disgusting by your points of view, self obsessed high school shooting candidates. Enjoy something because of the talent involved, and not just to score points about novel knowledge. Losers.

