UNIVERSAL WANTS TO MAKE MARRIAGE MORE OF A JOKE THAN IT ALREADY IS
Back in March, an article ran in the LA Weekly called “How to Get Divorced by 30.” It endorses, in my opinion, a rather odd worldview, that people ought to have a sort of test-run marriage that will prepare them for a legitimate one later on. I’m not sure how serious the author, Sascha Rothchild, really is about this premise, but she explains 15 steps that she experienced before and during her first marriage that ended, naturally, in divorce shortly before she turned 30.
Assuming she does mean what she says (she does mention that this method worked out for her parents), I can’t help but take issue with a couple things. The point she makes is that using the first marriage as a test will allow you to get the naivete and bullshit romantic bullshit out of your system. She feels this is a suitable substitute for using the ole noggin to try to avoid (emphasis on “try”) those types of emotionally-scarring situations.
Rothchild feels that — What? You want to know why the fuck I’m writing this shit? Jesus Christ you’re so goddamn demanding! I’m going to get to the point eventually! Alright, alright! Jesus! Universal bought the rights to the article so they can make a fucking movie out of it! It’s going to be about a girl who tries out the trial marriage thing only to realize it’s bullshit (thanks, Variety)! There’s no writer yet!
You fucking happy now? Did I give you what you want? Shit, that’s all you ever do: nag, nag, nag. Aww, baby, don’t start crying. I said DON’T FUCKING START CRYING! Wipe those tears off your face right now! God, I didn’t hit you that hard! There’s hardly any blood!
Alright, I’m calm now. I’m sorry about that; you just make things so difficult sometimes. Just think about the positives. Think about how happy you’ll be once you get to divorce me after we get married. And don’t think you aren’t going to marry me, bitch. I’m doing you a fucking favor, letting you use me as your trial run.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Related Links
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Patrick Ripoll)
Huh. Yeaaaaaah. Bout that.
Comment #2 (Posted by an unknown user)
I've never complained about Owen's writing before, but I really don't understand why the article suddenly takes such a shift in tone for the "joke".
We already knew what he "gets to" from the headline of the article.
Comment #3 (Posted by Sean)
I get what you were going for here, I'm just not sure it translates that well in print... Was your mother a fan of mescaline while you were still in utero?
Comment #4 (Posted by Raging Bullshit)
Universal! Hire OWEN to write the screenplay for "Divorced"! He's that good -- just look at today's article! What a hilarious skit, Phil. Hil-ar-ee-ous. Har-dee-har. (Just report the news, amigo.)
Comment #5 (Posted by an unknown user)
'Back in May, and article ran in the LA Weekly called “How to Get Divorced by 30.”' What a first sentence. Wrong month, bad comma usage and it's supposed to be "AN" not "AND". Look these over before you put them up.
Comment #6 (Posted by Kevin)
My, how far this site has fallen in the past 6 years. I miss SJR.
Comment #7 (Posted by masterbrocksamson)
Try reading this in the voice of Ernie from Sesame Street and it gets a whole lot funnier!
Comment #8 (Posted by Jesus Christ)
Unfunniest thing I've ever read on CHUD. Not to be mean, but I don't think Phil Owen has to worry about marriage.
Comment #9 (Posted by JHC)
Yeah, that article was merely a testament to my favorite line from Kiss Kiss Bang Bang:
"What is it with this place (LA) it's like someone shook the US by the East coast and all of the sane women held on."
Also, my "common sense" started tingling with the tone of the article, (the Sascha Rothchild one) which seems to have an "I wanna be Sex in the City but in LA."
yeah, and Owen, lame joke, but A for effort for going to the dark dark place in search of a laugh, everyone is kinda uptight about the verbal abuse thing.
Comment #10 (Posted by God)
My creations have finally failed me.
Comment #11 (Posted by joeytonz)
Jesus Christ, you fucking people are supposed to be journalists.
Comment #12 (Posted by The Devil)
Payback's a bitch. Thank's Owen! Keep failin'.
Comment #13 (Posted by Josh)
I would like to second that sentiment for the unfortunate absence of Smilin' Jack Ruby. Did he leave the band because everyone else was strung out on goofballs?
Comment #14 (Posted by Patryk)
Gaaaah! Flaming penis with female face!
Comment #15 (Posted by andrew collins)
I used to visit Chud 10 times a day, now it's down to about 5 times a week. Articles like this are a huge factor in that decline in interest. Nick, please fix your site starting with canning this sort of writing.
Comment #16 (Posted by Charlie Sheen)
Or just fix the site, period. It's been three months since the big redesign and the front page still looks like a bag of smashed assholes with text breaking out of boxes, headlines running into each other and the top links vanishing as soon as you click on a story.
Comment #17 (Posted by an unknown user)
Maybe that's why the article links on the left have the author listed now. So we can read our favorites, and bypass this mess.
Comment #18 (Posted by roger)
Word.
Comment #19 (Posted by Rabid Underdog)
"...bullshit romantic bullshit..."
Really?
Comment #20 (Posted by putting the eee in 'irony")
since when were bull's shits romantic?
Comment #21 (Posted by RCA)
"You fucking happy now? Did I give you what you want? Shit, that’s all you ever do: nag, nag, nag. Aww, baby, don’t start crying. I said DON’T FUCKING START CRYING! Wipe those tears off your face right now! God, I didn’t hit you that hard! There’s hardly any blood!
.... Damn, I thought he was actually taking some of the "Phil has children locked up in his basement" schtick and lightening up a little bit by joking about it. Turns out he was actually trying to be funny within the context of his "story". I almost laughed then I kept reading and just laughed at the comments section. Boo Phil Boo.
Comment #22 (Posted by King Mob and his Invisibles)
We all approve of this article.
Comment #23 (Posted by Mike)
It's articles like this that make me thankful to be single. Fuck marriage.
Comment #24 (Posted by Lucas)
This is ridiculous, offensive garbage without a single redeeming quality -besides perhaps, being so blatantly awufl that no one can make excuses for this guy anymore.
Comment #25 (Posted by I'm Finished)
Wow. Phil's writing has been up and down as far as I'm concerned. Mostly I just cringe at his poor grammar, but this . . . I just . . . oh Jesus. Please, Phil. Please. Just . . . just don't.
Comment #26 (Posted by Lar Molta)
Another article written by MR. OWEN! Must be my lucky week! Honestly, I think Phil Owen is still trying to find his niche at chud.com. I'm sure he'll improve. I BELIEVE IN PHIL OWEN!
Comment #27 (Posted by Three Oranges)
That might be the most phallic book cover I've ever seen.
Comment #28 (Posted by seacup_79)
So why is that penis wearing a tube sock from the 70's?
Comment #29 (Posted by Alaska)
Phil, you need, to, learn how, to, use commas.
He has no niche here.
Comment #30 (Posted by an unknown user)
lol
Comment #31 (Posted by Dave Brasgalla)
The actual news in this "article" could have been conveyed in one single sentence. The rest is crap.
Comment #32 (Posted by karl hungs)
I say keep Phil, shit is so bad it keeps me entertained.
Comment #33 (Posted by Patrick)
Divorce isn't funny. Just ask any kid whose parents separated. The fact that Universal is making a comedy about the subject is even worse, and it shows just how morally low we've become as a society. Owen, you should find another job. Your writing sucks and your topics are garbage.
Comment #34 (Posted by Pointless Man)
Wow. I only read this article because someone complained about it in Nick's leak letters.
It really IS that bad. Holy crap, this seriously could be the worst-written article ever to appear in chud! Congrats, Phil Owen!
Don't quit your day job or something. Sheesh.
This crap REALLY drags down the quality of what is usually a very thoughtful, insightful and interesting site. Yipes.