DVD REVIEW: NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN (JEREMY'S TAKE)
- By Jeremy Smith
- Published 03/11/2008
- DVD
BUY
IT AT AMAZON:
CLICK
HERE!STUDIO: Miramax
MSRP: $29.99
RATED: R
RUNNING TIME: 122 min
SPECIAL FEATURES:
- Working with The Coens
- The Making of No Country for Old
Men
- Diary of a Country Sheriff
THE PITCH
Always best to leave drug money where you find it, unless you're keen to touch off a narrative depicting the end of order in the universe (or, at the very least, America).
"Feast your eyes on my accursed coiffure!"
THE NUTSHELL
Joel and Ethan Coen adapt Cormac McCarthy's novel about a modern-day cowboy's ill-advised attempt to abscond with $2 million left over from a drug deal gone bloody and bad. Hot on his trail are the ghostly hit man Anton Chigurh and, always a step or two behind, Sheriff Ed Tom Bell. All does not end well.
THE LOWDOWN
The big news with No Country for Old Men is not that the Coen brothers finally adapted a work of literature, but that they finally owned up to it. Aside from the half-joking credit thrown Homer's way for O Brother, Where Art Thou?, they've generally left it to the viewer to identify their influences: Dashiell Hammett's The Glass Key and Red Harvest for Miller's Crossing, an amalgam of James M. Cain for The Man Who Wasn't There, and a smoked-out variation on Raymond Chandler's The Big Sleep for The Big Lebowski. Sometimes these names will come up in interviews, but, generally, the Coens prefer to stay tight-lipped on their distillation process, and this mystery (which Billy Bob Thornton once called termed their "secret shit") has made them all the more elusive and worshipped.
The key difference with No Country for Old Men is that, for once, audiences could peek behind the curtain and see the various knobs and switches the Coens would be manipulating; and though all is not explicated in McCarthy's novel, the areas of ambiguity could at least be anticipated. But there's still no getting ahead of the Coens. From Tommy Lee Jones's opening monologue as the weary, quietly fearful Ed Tom Bell (marked by the complete lack of a new Carter Burwell theme, a stunning absence that persists until the closing credits), the Coens don't so much draw you in as drag you under; Jones's Texas drawl has never sounded more barren, and his hopelessness is hauntingly underscored by those shots of clouds hanging over the parched southwestern landscape like evil spirits stalking anyone fool enough to stray beneath the oppressive sun.
"Shit. Two Karloffs."
Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) is one such fool, but before the Coens turn their gaze in his damned direction, they introduce the viewer to the reaper in flesh form (and a now-iconic pageboy haircut), Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem). Chigurh is a curiously vulnerable angel of death; he is apprehended, evaded, surprised, shot and, in the end, left to the mercy of children after a jarring car wreck (the film's one capitulation to cinematic cliche). But he does abide. Those who lay eyes on him, however, generally do not. And there is no playing chess with Chigurh (not even Twister or Battleship!); he'll give you the courtesy of a coin flip, but even a correct call is no guarantee that you're escaping the encounter with your life.
Once Chigurh is loosed on the world (after an orgasmic strangulation and a compressed-air braining), it is on to Moss's predicament, which is self-inflicted. There isn't much known about Moss at the outset, and, as he scrambles to stay out of scythe's reach of Chigurh, what the viewer learns about him isn't enough to evoke a tremendous amount of sympathy. As in any crime film, there is a desire to see the protagonist get away clean, but Moss has it coming; once he flees the aftermath of the shootout with that leather case stuffed full of $100 bills, he's as much a villain as Chigurh.
Pauline Kael once noted that the noir-conscious Coens preferred to take a god's-eye-view of their venal characters so as to more freely indulge their own cruel streak. But when they entertained the presence of morality in Fargo (via Frances McDormand's Marge Gunderson), the brothers exposed their humanity. For all their posturing and overt stylization, they really, truly care about the state of this world; and while they can still find great humor in human weakness (see The Man Who Wasn't There), the wickedness in their films could no longer occur in a vacuum. All this smirking mayhem comes at a steep cost.
"Vicks, deputy. We got Vicks."
Perhaps this is what throws viewers about the final third of the film; they want Sheriff Bell to confront and slay the Big Inexplicable Evil just as Marge did at the conclusion of Fargo. They need the mechanics of the procedural to payoff in some kind of semi-conventional final showdown - and a bedroom-set coin-flipping contest between Chigurh and Carla Jean Moss (Kelly Macdonald) doesn't count. But this isn't Chandler, and Bell is no Marlowe. That Chigurh is even walking amongst the living means the game, such as it was, is over. And humanity lost big time. Bell understands this from the beginning, but he doesn't accept it until the end, and that's why Jones's final monologue is such a kidney punch; there are small ways of preserving order (i.e. arresting the wrongdoers, observing an honorable code of conduct), but there is no restoring it. Chaos, and Chigurh, shall reign until it all comes crashing down, and god knows what that's gonna look like. Well, there is McCarthy's The Road...
No Country for Old Men may be the most viciously spare work in the Coens' oeuvre, but it's still an enormously entertaining film. After spinning out with Intolerable Cruelty and The Ladykillers, one can't understate the joy of getting to see the Coens not only return to form, but deliver their first indisputable masterpiece since Barton Fink (I wish I could love The Big Lebowski as others so fervently do). The mid-film shootout between Moss and Chigurh is as tautly staged as the "O, Danny Boy" ambush from Miller's Crossing, while their subtle enhancing of McCarthy's dialogue bends the tone just enough in their favor without trashing the author's intent. When one can only identify a solitary flaw - again, the trite, out-of-nowhere car crash - after several viewings, it's time to submit. If this is what the Coens do when tied down to someone else's text, then they seriously need to limit themselves more often.
"Papa, can you hear me? Oh, c'mon, dad, it's a little funny."
THE PACKAGE
The film looks and sounds terrific, so why bitch if the Coens have, once again, resisted an in-depth documenting of their process? The three featurettes included on this single-disc release - "The Making of No Country for Old Men", "Working with the Coens" and "Diary of a Country Sheriff" - are EPK quality and eminently skippable. If the Coens were unwilling to sit down for a commentary, a Brolin/Bardem track would've been acceptable, but its absence is hardly a crime.
10 out of 10
Spread The Word
Article Series
This article is part 2 of a 2 part series. Other articles in this series are shown below:
-
DVD REVIEW: NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN (JEREMY'S TAKE)
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Anderson)
Good review. I thought the lack of supplemental material hurt the overall package.
Also, I loved the last caption.
Comment #2 (Posted by Three Oranges)
Jeremy, you misused the word "lest," and therefore everything in this review and your life is now invalid.
Comment #3 (Posted by Sanuro)
Not sure why the car wreck is a cliche. Did it have to be in the movie? No. Did it have to be in the book? No. Still, where's the cliche?
Comment #4 (Posted by cock)
I want to make sweet, sweet love to this movie.
Comment #5 (Posted by DontchaThinkThisOutlawBitDoneGotOuttaHand)
Yes!!! Thanks, Beaks. Awesome as always. This is how ya do it people!(Teachers teach to do the world good...) Also, about the movie, I agree: a straight-up masterpiece. I don't know if it's too soon to give it the ranking, but I say it reigns over the Coens' canon. (In the future, this'n BLOOD SIMPLE will make a fan-fucking-tastic double bill) Thanks again.
Comment #6 (Posted by Dellamorte)
I could make a case for O Brother being one of their greats.
Comment #7 (Posted by Sean)
While the car crash in and of itself was "cliche", its use in the film was far from; it's meant to show just how futile chasing the money is in the grand scheme, as the last time we see Chigurh, he's doing the same thing Moss was doing at the border; using what little he's got to get away from those who would follow, with as little trace behind as possible. It shows that although their outlooks are vastly different, their fates are almost identical.
Comment #8 (Posted by leo lucky)
"and his hopelessness is hauntingly underscored by those shots of clouds hanging over the parched southwestern landscape like evil spirits stalking anyone fool enough to stray beneath the oppressive sun." Well I'll be damned. Excellent metaphor.
Comment #9 (Posted by maceodkat)
i'm sorry, but the film was a 7 outta 10. and #3 for the brothers cohen. i appreciate the observations about jones' speech at the end, but how much of that is based on the actual work, or your perception of it. the movie ramped up the tension for the entire movie until that third act. which was a big let down, but wtf do i know, i liked lady killers
Comment #10 (Posted by Tull)
The car crash sequence to me just showed that just like the coin flip life is all about chances we have no control over. While Anton had control over pretty much everything he did in the film that final sequence with him in the car crash showed even he's not immune to the fickle nature of chance.
Comment #11 (Posted by Jeremy Smith)
Just so we're clear, I don't mind the car crash. It's the way it was staged. I hate those out-of-nowhere wrecks. What hath ADAPTATION wrought?
Comment #12 (Posted by Ben)
The out-of-nowhere crash in Punch Drunk Love scared the crap out of me. I can't remember the one in Adaptation, though.
Great review.
Comment #13 (Posted by alfie)
but most car wrecks do come from out of nowhere. They are sudden and swift. You generally don't see them coming.
Comment #14 (Posted by Cogs of Fate)
I actually really appreciated the way the crash was staged. The way it's shot, from the first moment I expected a Bourne-style wreck from the drivers side (the window we can see out of) which seems to be the current style. But when it happens, it's from the other side, "behind" camera. More fucking with my head, and I really dug it.
Comment #15 (Posted by Po Boy)
"(see The Man Who Wasn't There)" Best advice of the day.
Comment #16 (Posted by M)
I totally expected the wreck, and then it happened, which was cliche to me. But then he survived, which was not, nor was the way he handled the situation (though totally in keeping with the character). To me I found that they took a cliche and reinvigorated it.
Comment #17 (Posted by LD)
Clooney + Zeta Jones in complete goddess mode = win. I don't care if Intolerable Cruelty wasn't as accomplished as it could have been. If you get married Beaks, I'm hacking your gift registry and changing all the items to berry spoons!
Comment #18 (Posted by Joseph)
I don't know that 'cliché' is the right word for the car crash (that word gets overused about as much as pretentious), but I agree with #16, I saw it coming. That didn't make it any less affecting when it occurred. To call the car crash cliché (or trite), I think you'd have to make the argument that it had been done numerous times before (both in how and why), but a few scattered examples (in unrelated flicks) does not a cliché make. Regardless, great film, even with the two old ladies siting next to me in the theater complaining about the violence (and then declaring it the worst movie they ever saw two seconds into the credits).
Comment #19 (Posted by Servo)
Does the book shed more light on the ending?
Comment #20 (Posted by Phil Owen)
*POUNDS SAND*
Comment #21 (Posted by Ju Mex)
The car crash is straight from the novel, and is presented as "something that just happens", which in happening to a character governed by fate, is actually somewhat fitting.
Comment #22 (Posted by lee)
The ending sucked. No further comment.
Comment #23 (Posted by errrrr)
I really like this movie, but I really hate this DVD cover. I'm sure it's been said before but what in the hell is wrong with Javier's face?!?!
Comment #24 (Posted by cobane)
The only problem I had with the car crash is that they didn't include the sentence from the book that described Anton reacting the split-second before the crash happens. It went like "He never wore a seatbelt while driving through cities because of situations exactly like this one; this allowed him to fling himself toward the passenger seat," only not all shitty and poorly constructed like that.
Thinking about it now, it seems like a dumb reason to not wear a seatbelt, but I remember being even more in awe of the character when I first read that.
Comment #25 (Posted by Lonesome, On'ry, and Mean)
Great review. "O' Brother" is my favorite, but "No Country" is the best. God, I love the Coens!!!!!
Comment #26 (Posted by I'VE ALWAYS BEEN CRAZY)
What a movie. What a review. Thanks for dropping science. Watched the film again yesterday after reading your post. Noticed new things I'd overlooked; caught things I didn't understand. It keeps getting better doesn't it?
Comment #27 (Posted by cowler)
I think Jeremy underestimates the power of Llewellyn's character. He may be painted with broad strokes, but I really came to like him and wanted to see his fate.
This is my problem with the ending--not that I needed Chigure to get it or wanted some big showdown, as Jeremy implies. For the Coens to cut away just as one of the main characters is about to get his just sucks the air right out of the movie.
I understand the Sheriff is the main character of the book and, in that scenario, leaving out Llewellyn's fate makes sense. Tommy Lee has comparatively little screen time, though, and is not the center of this film.
Obvs its an incredible work...but, without Llewellyn's death scene, it remains imperfect. The logic of the ending and the power of the conclusion are lessened without that narrative closure.
Comment #28 (Posted by Penway)
Jeremy, you're wrong I think to say that that Chigurh might go back on his word if someone were to call the coin flip correctly. This would betray Chigurh's conflicted morality, which is in fact very important to him within the scope of the film. You have to understand, Chigurh is actually quite principled. The key scene with Chigurh is his exchange with Carson Wells. He basically tells Carson -- if your rules led you to the pickle you're in at this very moment, then what good are your rules? You see, Chigurh "chooses" to be the bad guy because he knows the ball is weighted against the good guys and thus, he insures his own survival. That's the thing, Chigurh has decent impulses but he's disgusted by a world that works against good men. In essence, Chigurh has chosen to be a bad guy because had he not he knows darn well that one day he wouldve found himself in Carson Well's spot.

