REVIEW: 10,000 B.C.
- By Russ Fischer
- Published 03/6/2008
- Reviews
If nothing else, Roland Emmerich's 10,000 B.C., a would-be adventure epic that is mostly dull as grey paint, made me feel something new. Half an hour in, I fantasized that it might be a much better movie if Tarsem had directed. Never thought it would come to that. And by the time the movie got around to a final act filled with early Egyptian architecture and mammoth stampedes, even mentally reconfiguring it according to Tarsem's style barely kept me awake.In this pasted-together plot blue-eyed Evolet (Camilla Belle) is brought to a cold mountain village after her people are killed by 'four legged demons'. Young hunter D'leh (Steven Strait) falls for the girl and eventually vies for her hand during a mastodon hunt, and do you have any idea how ridiculous I feel just typing this?
Suffice to say, the 'four-legged demons' are just blokes on horseback who eventually attack D'leh's village and kidnap Evolet and most of the young menfolk. D'leh and mentor Tic'Tic (Cliff Curtis) tramp along after them. They eventually gather a force of warriors, fulfill some prophecies and swede scenes from 300, Jurassic Park and Aesop's Fables.
In addition to the character named Tic'Tic there's a host of African tribesmen, but Roland Emmerich is so worldly that he only makes them look primitive and stupid for a couple minutes. For a laugh. Except for the tribe wearing masks that might have been cut out of a bamboo fence from Home Depot. They look stupid all the time.
There's one point where the movie makes a switch from deadened tedium to nearly inspired idiocy. D'leh and Tic'Tic track the horsemen to a place where snowy mountains give way to dense jungle literally within a span of fifty feet. Funny enough, but a few moments later is when the killer ostriches attack.
You read that right.
Really, these animals are just velociraptors with bird feathers pasted on. Like all the other CGI in the film, Ueli Steiger keeps them moving in front of his camera as fast as possible. (Steiger and Emmerich fall back on two dance moves with the camera: fast-moving close-ups and the Lord of the Rings helicopter sweep.) But at this point if you expect anything unique or advanced from Emmerich you're far too idealistic. Anyone unlucky enough to still be watching the film at this point will get a dense few chuckles out of the seriously silly fight scene that ensues, but the laughter dies off fast.
After the movie ended I stared at my notepad for about 90 minutes (enabled by plenty of beer) trying to figure out what the hell I could say about this beast. I can't remember being this flabbergasted by a film in a long time; the simple fact that 10,000 B.C. exists sets my head spinning. I dare not even think about the bidding war for 2012, Emmerich's next movie / cocktail napkin scribble.
Worse, I feel like all of my words might only dignify the movie. A boring review will waste your time, but a lively one could have exactly the wrong effect by suggesting that the film is bad enough to be entertaining, which it manages for about four minutes of ostrich attack. There's no winning here, and not even any point in contextualizing Emmerich's effort within the moribund and typically worthless prehistoric genre.
Amid the mess, Cliff Curtis manages to be as dignified as possible, which means that in quite a few scenes his embarrassment is barely veiled. And he'll probably pull in a small audience, though it'll mostly be people who mistake him for Naveen Andrews. Strait and Belle make for attractive leads (OK, Belle is gorgeous in a way that overshadows even Monica Bellucci) but that won't get you through their trek across a desert.
I haven't even got to the movie's dumbest points, like the scene where we see D'leh learn to improvise spearmaking or when he advances mankind's development by navigating by the North Star for the first time in history. If we got to see him invent the flush toilet I might have been interested.
Finally, Emmerich builds a massive Egyptian pyramid construction set (not half as impressive as Apocalypto's) with perhaps the sole purpose of giving closure to fans of 300 when a thrown spear hit its god-like target. That's all you really need to know about this movie: it's a two-hour piece of 300 fan fiction that doesn't even have the generosity to provide the blowjobs and reacharounds that movie's militant audience really needed.
1 out of 10
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Brian)
I looked at some Camilla Belle photos after reading your review to make me feel better about the whole thing.
Comment #2 (Posted by jc)
Is there a new Dark Knight trailer shown with this?
Comment #3 (Posted by Russ)
@ jc: The screening I saw (which was a word of mouth, not press-only) had the last Joker-centric trailer beforehand, so I can't say.
Comment #4 (Posted by joe)
How much better would this be if they did just three things: 1) NO dialog, 2) copious over-the-top violence, 3) ample nudity. At least we'd have the reacharound...
Comment #5 (Posted by Opinion Guy)
Despite its apparently profound crappiness, this will be the #1 movie this weekend. Guaranteed.
Comment #6 (Posted by Juan)
Saw this last night for free (thank goodness). It was as bad as I was expecting...but I was shocked at how completely it ripped off Apocalypto's plot. Seriously, Mel Gibson could sue if he wanted to. This movie is terrible - even by Emmerich standards.
Comment #7 (Posted by Mike S)
Great review Russ. You're best (that i can remember reading)
Comment #8 (Posted by Gorenan the Gorebarian)
Great review. I just read a similar one on truedudesreviews.com. Seems like everyone thinks this is shit.
Comment #9 (Posted by Jeff)
You know a movie's special when it sinks past even the very lowest expectations.
Comment #10 (Posted by Rabid "Caveman" Apologist)
No Barbara Bach? Fuck this movie!{Nice review, Russ}.
Comment #11 (Posted by Walter)
The killer ostriches are terror birds, by the way. Seriously, they were nasty creatures that at one time lived in South America... which shows you how dumb this film is, given it is supposed to be set in Europe.
Comment #12 (Posted by Yappy's Dog Treats)
If there ain't a glyptodon getting hate-fucked by a megatherium in this movie then I'm not going to see it. This is my thumb rule for every movie actually. I don't go to movies much.
Comment #13 (Posted by Peter Venkman)
the new Hulk trailer is going to be in front of this right?
Comment #14 (Posted by Ronald Bryan)
And there's also the fact that at the end of the day, the movie is really just some screwed up take on the Moses story. I was waiting for D'Leh to say "Let my people go!"
Comment #15 (Posted by Johnny Daywalker)
Monica Belluci overshadowed? Thats not possible ever.
Comment #16 (Posted by Erich Zann)
I'll bet that the "killer ostrich" is simply a diatryma - and that while this is almost certainly a painfully bad film, giggling at an existing creature certainly does makes someone look ignorant and foolish... but not the filmmakers.
Comment #17 (Posted by RCA)
Actually, velicoraptors(can't spell) and T-Rex's are now believed to have had feathers. Saw some special on it last night. Maybe their is a tiny, very small, spec of intelligence put into a few seconds of this movie. I will never know, because I will never watch this.... not until 10,000 A.D
Comment #18 (Posted by Telecaster Workman)
Because the car-crushing jaws of the T-Rex and spped, intelligence, and gut-spilling claw of the velociraptor weren't scary enough, scientists feel the need to give them feathers. Let the nightmares begin!
Comment #19 (Posted by Peter Venkman)
I'm sure giving the "dinos" feathers is in tune with them evoulving into present day birds but with certain "dino" features kept for SCARY!!! reasons.
Comment #20 (Posted by Rabid Daryl Hannah Apologist)
No John Sayles screenplay? Fuck this movie!
Comment #21 (Posted by Lord Shell)
Don't beat around the bush, what do you really think?
Seriously, Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich are the Twins of Satan. I've hated everything they've ever done and possibly shall ever do.
Comment #22 (Posted by Boa)
I just saw it and I want my ten dollars back! So boring! The Dark Knight and Iron Man Trailers were entertaining though.
Comment #23 (Posted by SciCurious)
You forgot to mention the astonishingly bad bluescreen work (quality circa 1978). Crappy Emmerichisms aside, I was surprised at the bad technical glitches on show. Did a mastodon shit on the negs forcing a quick res-hoot in one of those "shoot your own music video" booths? BTW: Devlin didn't co-write this - but he should have - at least he understands basic formula and structure (to a fault) - this film barely hung together on any level at all.
Comment #24 (Posted by The CAVEMAN appreciation Society)
Awful, awful movie.
Comment #25 (Posted by Not Ringo Starr)
I hope Roland Emmerich is done.
Comment #26 (Posted by Not Anything Clever)
Nice review, Russ.
Comment #27 (Posted by maverickheartgoose)
Uwe Boll terrible. this sucks balls. Bit of a fan before, now RE can poke it. 2012 must be aborted. i wouldnt even let him near Stargate 2.

