SPIELBERG'S CHICAGO 7 MOVIE TO BE A REMAKE
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 02/21/2008
- News
The other night I saw Chicago 10, Brett Morgen's excellent, half
animated documentary about the riot at the Chicago Democratic
Convention in 1968 and the trial of eight 'conspirators' a year later,
and I was struck by two things:- Steven Spielberg is just not the right person to do this story in his next film, The Trial of the Chicago 7* (although Aaron Sorkin is a great choice to write the script) (you've heard me whine about this before)
and
- The Trial of the Chicago 7 can't have a structure any better than Morgen's, which uses the trial transcripts to flash back to the events at the convention.
It turns out I was right about number two and Brett Morgen gave me some food for thought on number one. I sat down with him this morning to talk about the film and he told me that The Trial of the Chicago 7 is essentially an adaptation of his film.
"I don't know if they're going to call it an adaptation or call it 'Inspired by the film Chicago 10' or what have you," he said. "The way it came about is that last year after Sundance I screened the film for Walter Parkes, not in the context of doing a remake or anything, just in a general meeting. Walter saw the movie and called my agent and I immediately and was like, 'I love this, I have to remake this.'"
Morgen has been consulting with Parkes and the production team, and he said that Sorkin told him that he's seen the movie 50 times. "I'm really excited about it; I'm excited because my film, regardless of what I want to call it, is that it is a documentary because I used all primary sources. The reason I didn't interview survivors was that if they told me stories that existed outside of our [footage] I couldn't really incorporate it into a film. What Aaron is going to do is all the stuff I couldn't do in a documentary, all of the stuff that happens outside the cameras. I think it's going to be a tremendous project."
As for my misgivings about a square like Spielberg taking on this seminal moment of American radicalism? "I had the same question you did, that he wasn't the person you'd think of," he said. "Although, when we were making the film Stuart Levy, the editor, and I would watch Saving Private Ryan over and over again to watch the Normandy scenes and to see how they created the experience of what it was like to be on that beach. If there's anyone who can pull off the riots, any filmmaker in the world, it's going to be Steven Spielberg. In fact, when Walter first talked about the film, I didn't say it to Walter, but I was thinking, 'You're going to shoot the riots? You think you can do a better job than we could with real footage and a cast of ten thousand people?' But yeah, if there's one person in the world who can do it, it's Steven Spielberg."
Morgen also thinks that Spielberg's squareness may be just what the movie needs. "The thing is I wasn't born in 68. I think sometimes you need an outsider's perspective to do justice to a story. If you gave each of the defendants a hundred thousand dollards to write a script, you're going to get eight very specific takes on the trial. Which might be great, but I think you're better served by going for somebody who wasn't there, who can approach it with fresh eyes. When I came to this it was all new to me, everything was fresh. Not only that, I didn't really know what had happened to the people so I didn't have the baggage of, 'Oh, Rennie Davis ended up selling life insurance. Jerry Rubin' [became] a yuppie, so fuck him!' I'd much rather someone like Steven Spielberg make this film than someone like Dennis Hopper, who was very active in the movement at the time. Most importantly, he's the greatest filmmaker living today, and his more personal films, like Schindler's List, are masterpieces. I think that what Spielberg has shown through his life, even moreso than his work, is his commitment to social change and values and what have you, and he's obviously incredibly dedicated and committed to his causes, and I think this falls in line with that. I don't want to speak for him, but I think he's actually a brilliant choice."
I don't know if Morgen has sold me, but he's definitely opened my mind some. My full interview with Brett Morgen will run soon, and keep an eye out for my review of Chicago 10, which opens in limited release on February 29.
*Here's how the name discrepency works: there were eight indicted conspirators. Black Panther Bobby Seale's case was severed from the rest, leaving seven. The two defense lawyers got jail time for contempt of court, making them the final two of the ten. In true Yippie fashion you can count this group in any way you like.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Mr. Gittes)
Sasha Baron Cohen has obviously said yes to Spielberg, right?
I thought Oliver Stone did a pretty job of re-creating the riots in Born on the Fourth of July...
Comment #2 (Posted by an unknown user)
What's interesting is that at the time this case really wasn't as big a deal to the youth as Devin makes it out to be. Most of them were too busy watching the TV and waiting for their number to get called and their lives to change completely. A bunch of radical assholes in Chicago was a distraction more then a battle in a revolution.
Comment #3 (Posted by Ross)
I don't know. I thought "Munich" was a massive achievement (at least in my opinion) that saw Spielberg recreate a time period faithfully, make complex characters, and for once have an ending that knocked the breath out of you. If he put his heart into this, I dont have a doubt he'd knock it out of the park. This material sounds awfully like "Amistad" (gorgeous film with good acting, but painted some characters so one dimsensional it hurt my nether regions).
Comment #4 (Posted by Dean)
I disagree that a film about Chicago '68 "can't have a structure any better than" Chicago 10. From beginning to end Chicago 10 is a film about the trial and its narrative is determined by the trial. That is not the whole story of what happened in the streets and in the parks of Chicago in August 1968. (Not to mention what happened inside the International Amphitheatre.) Chicago 10 is marvelous film and has superb archival footage. But because it uses the trial as a lens it only gives a narrowed view of Chicago '68. Think about the view of Chicago '68 embodied in Medium Cool--vastly different, not encumbered by leaders and heroes, and for that reason truer to what actually happened, which had very little to do with leaders.
Comment #5 (Posted by Alexander)
I'm glad to learn that the rumors of Chicago 7's death were premature and that it's only been delayed. There's nothing more annoying than Internet scribes declaring great filmmakers to be "out of their element" with their next film. I thought we *wanted* filmmakers to reach beyond what they've done in the past and continue maturing (as Spielberg does). Or do we really want him to make Jurassic Park IV, Indy V and all three Tintin movies instead? Spielberg's continual growth as a filmmaker is partly evident in the different genres he plays his latest opus in and subject matter he tackles. I also think he's been on a very strong roll since Saving Private Ryan, one that will possibly one day be compared to the early-'50s-to-Psycho Hitchcock run.

