REVIEW: JUMPER
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 02/15/2008
- Reviews
What made the Silver Age Marvel characters better than their
counterparts at DC Comics is that they always seemed to react to
getting superpowers in ways that made sense to the reader. The only
people whose first thought when gaining astonishing powers is to become
a crimefighter
are the people who grew up on comic books; a regular person would look
at these abilities and wonder how they can be used to their own
benefit. That's real, and that's why Spider-Man's origin remains the
single greatest of any hero. While nowhere near the deftly executed
perfection of that origin, Jumper presents a superhero origin story
that works because it starts in that same place - if you could suddenly
teleport at will, what would you do? Get laid and get rich, obviously, and that's what David Rice does with his powers. Rice is a dweeb in high school who has a huge crush on his classmate Millie. One winter day he presents Millie, who dreams of world travel, with a snow globe from Paris; a bully tosses the globe onto a frozen river and when David goes to retrieve it he ends up imitating a scene from The Omen II. Everybody thinks David is dead, but at the last second his innate teleportational ability kicks in and he, and about a hundred gallons of icy river water, end up in the local library. Like Dr. Robert Banner on TV, David takes advantage of his own death to finally leave town and his abusive single dad (how abusive? He's Michael Rooker) and heads to New York, where he robs a bank by teleporting into the vault. This action catches the eye of pop superstar Sisqo, played with obvious boredom by Samuel L Jackson.
Flashforward seven or eight years and David is living the high life, jumping around the world getting laid and lounging about. Things are about to change, though - he's attracted the attention of another Jumper, who isn't happy with the way David is flaunting his powers. And Sisqo and his band of Paladins, a holy order who have been hunting and killing Jumpers since the Middle Ages, has finally tracked him down. When his whole life falls apart, David unwisely returns home one last time to see how Millie is doing (I guess to say goodbye before going into hiding) and winds up convincing her to go to Rome with him, tying her deeply into the trouble he's in.
Jumper's a very light film, and that's part of why I liked it. There are hints of larger backstory and history, but director Doug Liman and round writing robins David Goyer, Jim Uhls and Simon Kinberg don't get too heavy with it. That's a problem for some more literal-minded people who can't make connections on their own, especially as we get to the end of the movie, which consists of a series of scenes designed only to set up the sequel, but I liked the way the bigger picture was just teased. And I really liked the way no one ever sat down and laid out what David's powers and limitations are; instead the movie does a good job of showing us these things through actions, only occasionally relying on Griffin, the other Jumper, to fill in the pieces with exposition.
Less successful is the film's casting. While Hayden Christiansen doesn't reach the heights he achieved in what might be his only good film role in Shattered Glass, he also doesn't offend at Star Wars levels. David is a guy who has spent his formative years on his own, never getting close to anyone and hiding who he is, so you can rationalize a certain amount of Christiansen's stiffness in that way, although I still think you'd be rationalizing. As I said before, Jackson gives an almost totally disinterested performance; I feel like I've seen him trying harder in The Man. Rachel Bilson is pretty but never connected with me as a human being.
Maybe it's all these so-so performances that really makes Jamie Bell stand out. I think Bell's a ferociously talented actor, and while he's not doing career-best work in the teleporting superhero movie, he's having a blast and ripping shit up. Griffin is more advanced than David in that he's tussled with the Paladins more, he's been on his own as a Jumper since he was five, and if he hasn't completely snapped he's certainly right on the edge. He lives in a self-declared lair in the Sahara, a place adorned with drawings of Jackson and packed with weaponry. Griffin's trying to take the battle to the Paladins, and he's not afraid to kill them in the process - which really does seem sort of fair. Bell has so much fun in the role that his appearance gives the second half of the movie a very needed jolt from Hayden's half-lidded stylings.
What sold me the most on Jumper, though, was the way the movie hops around the world. Liman and crew went to the places where the Jumpers go - when they're zooming through the streets of Tokyo in a stolen car, they're in Tokyo. Movies are about bringing us places, and I'm always sad when the filmmakers can only seem to bring us to facsimiles of places. There's a rush to be gotten from seeing characters in the real environments, a sense not quite of realism but of actuality. If you're spending this much money on a movie, show me cool stuff, not CGI versions of cool stuff.
Speaking of CGI, the Jumping effects are done very well. There's a kinetic energy to the Jumping, and Liman doesn't hold back on it. These characters would be using Jumping as part of their daily lives, and the film shows that. I do wish that the fight scenes had taken advantage of Jumping in a more coherent way - imagine if Griffin had developed his own teleport-fu over the years.
I had walked into Jumper expecting a wreck of massive proportions, so I was surprised when the movie ended up being only a bit of a mess. It's certainly a film aimed at 15 year olds (it features some sub-prime time TV sexuality and one use of the word 'fuck' that will get a young man's blood pumping), but I think that Liman tries to not make it a film that only a 15 year old can like. He doesn't fully succeed, and the movie does demand that adults put aside some of their higher functioning to really groove on what is happening on screen. But I do know that if I was a 13, 14 or 15 year old kid this movie would send me out of the theater with a feeling of electricity - I would go home and start writing Jumper adventures or try to make a Jumper role playing game or do any of the horribly nerdy stuff I used to do that kept me from getting laid until I was 18. Not every film has to speak to me as a 35 year old, but Jumper is successful because it made me remember how I was twenty years ago.
7 out of 10
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by shatner)
So Dev, you liked this but not Batman Begins?
Comment #2 (Posted by IanL)
Couldn't agree less with the review, I hated this film with a passion I havent had for a while for hating films, but pop superstar Sisqo played by Samuel L Jackson was fucking hilarious.
Comment #3 (Posted by King0ne)
Pretty accurate review. It could have a tiny bit more of fleshing out certain story points because it does come across as a big tease. If it makes enough cash this weekend and finishes at a respectable worldwide total there'll be a sequel that Liman can produce and hand over directing duties to someone else like he did with Bourne.
There's more than enough jumping back in time to provide a history of the Paladin v. Jumper battle.
Comment #4 (Posted by Tennyson)
Devin, are you saying you no longer play role-playing games?
Comment #5 (Posted by Big Jim Slade)
"how abusive? He's Michael Rooker". Awesome.
Comment #6 (Posted by Gatack)
Oh why don't you go ahead and marry your Marvel encyclopedia already.You already sleep with it under your pillow.
Comment #7 (Posted by Mike Flynn)
Might check this out on Blu-ray if the movie has some Torque-sized levels of hilarity. Is that true?
Comment #8 (Posted by diaglo)
Gotta disagree on almost every level, except for the Jackson-mailing-it-in bit. This was the worst plot and character development I've seen in quite awhile, with horrible performances to boot. Yeah, the jumping was fun, but there was nothing, NOTHING anchoring the action to anything the least bit compelling. It's all so truncated and sloppy that I actually thought the projectionist forgot to include a reel or two. And I don't care if it's setting up sequels, even as a first episode it's horrible.
Comment #9 (Posted by an unknown user)
Who is Hayden Christiansen?
Comment #10 (Posted by Ronald Bryan)
This review pretty much sums up my feelings on the movie. Or, as I said when someone asked how it was "Not bad". It's the kind of movie I will watch if I catch it on HBO, because it is enjoyable, but it's not something I will go back to watch over and over on Blu-Ray, because it doesn't have the sheer fun of a 300 or the story of a Departed.
Comment #11 (Posted by an unknown user)
Wait, are we not calling Blu-Ray dvds 'dvds' any more? Or is this just a geek thing? Cuz it sounds an awful lot like those cheesy lounge lizards in late-60's sex films that referred to their stereos as 'hi-fi's.'
Comment #12 (Posted by Zachra)
"..imagine if Griffin had developed his own teleport-fu..."
Yeah, then what if he dyed his skin blue then changed his name from Griffin to Nightcrawler? Then it would be COMPLETE copyright infringement instead of merely partial.
Comment #13 (Posted by Joe)
I had no idea that was a Devin review until I scrolled back up. I was not expecting you to be nice to this film, but more than that you were just... nice. Not that I don't think you're a noce guy, but it's not how you write. That was different, and I might check this out tomorrow if the girlfriend insists on going to the movies instead of the bar.
Comment #14 (Posted by alfie)
"how abusive?? he's michael rooker"
very funny
Comment #15 (Posted by bpvalentine)
"how abusive? He's Michael Rooker"
This is why I come to CHUD 9 times a day.
Comment #16 (Posted by Marc Wrzesinski)
Visually, it works extremely well, the SFX and cinematography are great. The Plot itself is straightforward and works...but the acting is just so flat it kills the film. Hayden Christensen looks as if he is about to cry every 30 seconds because quite simply, he can't act. Rachel Bilson, can act, but without given anything to do...boring. Jamie Bell was fun, and Sam Jackson....I think he had more of an engaging character in Snakes on a Plane. Rooker was fun, but I will say this, Diane Lane. Why? Why waste a solid actress on such minuscule and pointless role?
It wasn't terrible...but it wasn't good either. 4/10
Comment #17 (Posted by an unknown user)
Lol! Sisqo, that was hilarious
Comment #18 (Posted by an unknown user)
So basically... if I'm 12, I'll love this? Splendid.
Next!
Comment #19 (Posted by Timerider)
In ten yrs., people'll be talkin it up as a geek classic. I'll still be hating it.
Comment #20 (Posted by an unknown user)
From another TB and to add to the record: I look forward to Jumpers various porn rip-offs like 'Humper', 'Pumper' and the classy 'Dumper'. " In the future He can teleport.. UP YOUR ASS" would be a great tagline.
Comment #21 (Posted by Wes)
This movie was ASS, and there is no other appropriate description. There are so many things wrong with it I couldn't even try to start listing em, but the worst part is, the concept is dope,but Liman wasted. PISSED OFF when I left the theater.
Comment #22 (Posted by maverickheartgoose)
"Pumper" - thats a great idea! This was ok. hayden is still utter shite though. ladyboyLeo wouldve been a better Anakin. Or Shia. Or that dude from dawsons. No not him, the other one. Ill wait for Jumper on BD, with fifteen minutes of additional jumping. Limans dvds are always worth waiting for. Maybe Greengrass should take on the series though. Worked out alrigth last time...
Comment #23 (Posted by Natasha)
I enjoyed the film. Yes it could have had more depth but if anything it introduced some wicked storyline with if anything like Devin said will leave 15 year olds writing their fanfiction/roleplaying and whatnot. So much more could have been done (Diane Lane was in it for like what 3 minutes? and to what degree? pointlessness). I would have liked more Jamie Bell, loved his character, borderline psychotic though with a purpose.
And I'm sorry to say, I really couldn't connect with Rachel Bilson. In all her scenes I felt I was watching the OC, and I couldn't take her seriously what so ever. I felt Hayden wontattempttospellhislastname acted slightly more human than what I saw in Star Wars, though only slightly. And Samuel L. Jackson was no different to his other more recent characters, he looked very... bored.

