WHO ENJOINS THE WATCHMEN?
- By Jeremy Smith
- Published 02/12/2008
- News
It's a little late in the day for 20th Century Fox to enjoin Warner Brothers from going forward with a Watchmen movie, but, according to The Hollywood Reporter, they initiated legal action last Friday to do just that. This whole dispute stretches back to the late 80s, when Fox secured the rights for Watchmen and subsequently commissioned screenplays from Sam Hamm and Charles McKeown (the latter writing for Terry Gilliam). In 1991 Fox "assigned some rights via a quitclaim to Largo International", but there was always an understanding that the studio retained distribution rights for the first film to be made from the property. When Largo went tits up, Lawrence Gordon acquired the company's rights and entered into a turnaround agreement which stipulated a buy-out payment to Fox is Gordon set the film up at another studio. Now that Warner Brothers is knee deep in Watchmen with Zack Snyder at the helm, Fox is a little peeved that they've received no buy-out price from Gordon. So they's a-gonna sue.
Now, will this impede Snyder's work in any way, thereby jeopardizing the March 6, 2009 release date? I highly doubt it. From what I gather, this is Fox being a little vindictive and looking for a nice, fat settlement. And, after a good deal of legal wrangling, I'm sure Warner Brothers will throw a bunch of money at the rival studio to make them go away. I don't know why Fox waited until now to hit Warner Brothers (and, by extension, Gordon) with a suit; I guess they have more leverage if the film is past the point of getting scuttled.
But don't fret. Barring any technical setbacks on Snyder's end, you'll get your Watchmen next year.
Spread The Word
Related Articles
Related Links
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by WHERE MY BAZOOMBAS AT)
Can you just PLEASE put that picture of Carla Gugino in front of every Watchmen article? Is that so much to ask?
Comment #2 (Posted by Matt R.)
Most lawsuits, for various fact-finding and research reasons, get filed right before the statute of limitations on that particular cause of action expires. I would bet that's the case here, and doesn't have much to do with the fact that WB already started production.
Given the fact that adjudication takes months and years, if Fox's goal was to truly halt production, they would've filed months ago. They're probably just trying to enforce their contract.
Comment #3 (Posted by Matt)
Enjoin is a wierd word. Outside of a legal context, it means to tell someone to do something. In a legal context, it means to prohibit someone to do something. What the hell! Those are damn near diametrically opposed meanings. Stupid English language.
Comment #4 (Posted by Tim)
Sounds to me like they heard the good buzz and just wanted a piece of it. I predict a percentage rather than a settlement, or shared distribution overseas.

