- Home
- Editorial
- The Devin's Advocate
- THE DEVIN'S ADVOCATE: THE DIRTY DOUBLE STANDARD
THE DEVIN'S ADVOCATE: THE DIRTY DOUBLE STANDARD
- By Devin Faraci
- Published 02/6/2008
- The Devin's Advocate
If, before she was committed, Britney Spears had been found dead with "oxycodone, hydrocodone, diazepam, temazepam, alprazolam and doxylamine" (better known as OxyContin, Vicodin, Valium, Xanax, Restoril and Unisom) in her system, the media would be full of talk about a druggie ODing. When Heath Ledger's toxicology report turns up the same drugs, it's a tragic accident, and everybody makes sure to mention that he was prescribed these drugs. But what's the difference, really? None, as far as I can see.What's funny is that I may be one of the few people who see the Britney Spears case as a tragedy and the Ledger situation as yet another show biz OD. Spears, who is so mentally ill that she has been ruled incapable of taking care of herself, is suffering in a very real way. While her mental problems are certainly exacerbated by drug use and her lifestyle (which includes the sheerly evil way the media has taken to stalking her in the last year), it's obvious that there's real sickness at the base of it all. If Britney Spears had never become famous, had just stayed Florida trailer trash, it's likely that she would still be quite crazy today. She's fucked up in the head, in a very real way. Yet there's a glee at her situation, based partially on the fact that her 'art' is considered disposable trash, her riches are considered unfairly gained and her lifestyle is considered unsavory.
Here's the headline you would read if Britney had died with that same drug cocktail in her blood: "Hillbilly Heroin Kills Brit Brit." Oxycodone is a serious opioid, a major league pain killer that is prescribed to people dying of cancer. It's the kind of meds you're on when you're in so much pain that you cannot continue your daily activities. And it's a drug that became very popular first with rural types, and has now spread to the big city party scene. I've been offered Oxy recreationally, and I have to say that I was taken aback - besides the drug's previously hickish context, it's heavily addictive and very easy to OD on. It's a recreational drug for morons, as far as I'm concerned, for people who have no common sense. And that's coming from someone who has done quite a number of recreational drugs, some of which were incredibly stupid to even try. There's a limit, though, one that anyone with sense will see and understand.
I'm not Heath's doctor; it's possible that he was dealing with so much pain that he needed to be on OxyContin AND Vicodin, although I tend to really, really doubt it. It seems evident that he was on these drugs recreationally, and the reality is that he just plain fucked up and ODed on them (although we don't know the amount of the drugs in his system - it's still possible that his overdose wasn't accidental). There's a tragedy in that, in that he leaves behind a family and a promising career, but the difference between his OD and that of a junkie on the streets is one of perception only. The Hollywood spin machine kicks into gear and, because Ledger was seen as someone with value, someone whose story sells more when presented as a tragic accident as opposed to the vengeance of God that Britney's seemingly inevitable demise will be, we get a watered down version of the truth.
People who would otherwise spit venom at a 'lesser' artist who died in the same way will pontificate on how sad it is that Heath's prescription meds interacted like that (and make no mistake - any celeb who ODs on pharms got them in a prescription. They don't buy them on the streets). People are very happy to let the spin machine do its work, to cloud the truth behind the chemicals in Heath Ledger's blood.
Why? A big part of it is the relationship that this country has with drugs. We love them and we hate them. A number of you reading this are now, or have been, on drugs like Xanax (in Ledger's system) or Prozac. We go for better living through chemistry, to a point. If Ledger had coke in his system, there'd be no spinning it - that drug is bad, but a 'prescription' drug is okay. I have to admit that I don't understand this mindset - I'd rather be on cocaine than Prozac any single day of the week. And I find the idea that it's okay to use some substances to get fucked up but not others baffling - except, again, in the case of truly stupid drugs, like heroin or OxyContin, drugs that will win the battle against you every single time. I'm all for smart recreational drug use, and what Ledger did was not smart.
So we're all going to pretend that Ledger's death was an accident, some freak occurrence that no one could have seen coming. But when Lindsey Lohan takes too many vikes and Oxy one night, the jackals and vultures will be out in full force. I'm truly sorry that Heath Ledger is dead - sorry for his family and sorry for our film culture. But I'm not going to pretend that his death was anything but the latest in a very long line of entertainers falling under the weight of their own drug use.
Spread The Word
Article Series
This article is part 1 of a 2 part series. Other articles in this series are shown below:
-
THE DEVIN'S ADVOCATE: THE DIRTY DOUBLE STANDARD
Related Articles
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Pat from Boston)
An excellent column, 100% true.
Comment #2 (Posted by Eileen)
Excellent editorial Devin and I share the same sentiments that you do regarding this matter.
Comment #3 (Posted by Tony)
Not 100% true. The Spears family is Louisiana trailer trash. We have enough problems here in Florida (hurricanes, carnies, the simple act of voting); we don't need the Spears clan heaped upon us. A correction would be appreciated.
Comment #4 (Posted by Jim)
Interesting, I never thought about it like that.
It has gotten extremely tiring hearing about Britney. I admit, I laughed a little when she shaved her head and attacked a paparazzi's car, but she's just been appearing in the news too much the past few months.
Comment #5 (Posted by Mark)
Nailed it, Devin! Heath was a drug addict and OD. The tragic part is he let the drugs be more important than his family, especially his daughter.
Comment #6 (Posted by P. Lee)
Oxycodone became popular in Appalachia because one of the main industry in the region is coal mining. These miners then would get black lung disease and their doctors would prescribe Oxycodone for them. These dying miners didn't need to take all of their meds...Soon their kids got into Oxycodone and realized how lucrative it was to sell it, especially to city slickers...And the tragedy...All the addicts I know are dead but nary a word for them. Dig a little deeper Devin, I'm sure you'll find a scene as terrible as 'Traffic' and you don't even have to go across the border.
Comment #7 (Posted by shamu)
excellent point about brit vs. heath. one thing to think about is how they get the drugs. It's become common for doctors to prescibe some pills for every complaint. I'm sure 'big stars' have an even easier time getting prescriptions, and let's face it, everyone wants the "hot new drug", whether it's prozac, oxycodin or ambien.
I'm curious if one dr. prescribed all of heath's pills.
Comment #8 (Posted by Andy)
I'd like to point out that there is a difference between oxycontin and oxycodone.
That's all.
Great article, Devin. I agree 100%
Comment #9 (Posted by Kaiban)
good point. Legal pharmacology is the high of the new millennium. why risk the street and dealers when your own doctor can get it legally for u.
Comment #10 (Posted by Logo Lou)
Abusing legal and/or legal drugs is bad, that's my standard. When they kill someone I like (Heath), I'm sad. When they kill someone I couldn't care less about (Anna Nicole), I still could not care less.
Comment #11 (Posted by Garth)
It's interesting that you're willing to cut slack to someone with a history of use, but not to someone who isn't a target of the paparazzi.
It's also interesting that you're willing to condemn a man without all the facts. You admit that you don't know (and that it hasn't been released) how much of each drug he had in his system, yet you don't have a problem railing against him.
Fuck you, Devin, you prick.
Comment #12 (Posted by p)
LEAVE BRIT err, um, HEATH ALONE!
Comment #13 (Posted by John Campea)
The basic problem with your post and asking the question "what if it had been Britney", is that you ignore the facts of patterns.
If Heath had been in the news constantly about odd behavior, fewquent drug use, losing custody of his kids, shaving his head withtout reason and constant displays as such... then yes, your comparison would be valid.
But it's not. If Brieny had been found dead of all the same legal drugs that Heath had, but wasn't a living sideshow spectical for the last couple of years, I have ZERO doubt her "death" would be seen as the same sort of tragedy as Heath's.
It's only a double standard if the situations are similar... and these situations are as different as night and day.
Comment #14 (Posted by Trevor)
I totally agree with John Campus. These situations are as different as night and day.
Comment #15 (Posted by andrew)
Like there's any way Campea would ever agree with Devin, even when he has a good, sound point...like he does here. Shouldn't you be blogging about Transformers 2?
Comment #16 (Posted by Jason)
I have lost a close family member to the abuse of perscription drugs and suspect I may loose another soon. Oxycodone is for people in serious pain... people who in most cases are dying already. Did Heath Ledger have a shattered pelvis or some form of cancer that we were not aware of? If he didn't then he shouldn't have been taking that shit. Another great editorial from Devin. Excellent work as always.
Comment #17 (Posted by PWLovecraft)
I'd like to find out more facts (note FACTS, not speculation) on Heath Ledger's past drug use and any health (mental or physical)problems he might have had before I make up my mind on this, but, obviously, the pharmacy the man had at his disposal doesn't play well in his favour. At any rate it's a huge loss for his family, friends, and fans of his work alike. And as far as Britney Spears goes, that situation won't be ending well at all. Another shame regardless of how anyone feels about her, it's rotten to see the decline of a human being being spotlighted like this.
Comment #18 (Posted by borehole)
Great stuff, Devin. The Spearsenfreud's been grossing me out lately, and this column helped me understand why. (Garth's right that you're a prick but that's just because you didn't like Blair Witch)
Comment #19 (Posted by Arnie)
Working for a work comp agency has taught me a lot about painkillers. While OxyContin is highly addictive and just about the strongest narcotic that will be prescribed for people not admitted as in-patients, it is often prescribed for injuries that are not high severe. Most physicians (I should also mention my company deals with California quite a bit) prescribe OxyContin for anything from a back sprain to a broken bone. It's legally prescribed for a lot of conditions that don't require you to be on your death bed. I also see a lot of claimants being loaded up on the same drugs found in Ledger's body while on OxyContin, which is pretty ridiculous. I think the use of these legal narcotics is fairly common, and applies to a lot more people than luxurious actors or trailer trash as described in the article. If anyone should be bitched about, it should be the money-hungry doctors that are willing to prescribe anything as long as they're making a nice profit.
Comment #20 (Posted by Rodofwar)
John Campea: I think you're missing the entire point of this. The differences in thier lives is exactly the reason there would be a difference in the way thier "tragic" deaths would be percieved by the public. There's no denying that and that is exactly what Devin is saying.
Comment #21 (Posted by Devin)
Arnie, thanks for the insight into how doctors overprescribe pain meds.
Comment #22 (Posted by an unknown user)
"I'd rather be on cocaine than Prozac any single day of the week."
This is the kind of bullshit mindset that can really do harm to people... that antidepressants are some kind of candy for those who can't control themselves. Depression has different causes, but for those who truly NEED Prozac it's due to a Serotonin disorder no different than diabetes. To make a statement like Devin has is highly irresponsible.
IF depression was Ledger's problem and he'd found the right treatment for it, maybe he'd be alive today. Self-medicating via your shitty neighborhood club is never the answer.
Comment #23 (Posted by Aethyrr)
So.. you wanna bang Britney?
Comment #24 (Posted by B_MetalSucks)
Devin and The Ultimate Warrior finally agree about something. The end IS near.
Comment #25 (Posted by David)
Unknown User, Devin was talking about using Cocaine vs. Prozac recreationally. He wasn't bashing people that actually need Prozac, or implying they need to do coke instead.
Comment #26 (Posted by Matt D)
Yep. That's why we come to a movie web site. To read the thoughts of some guy speculating on the drug use of another guy he never met. To see him pass judgement in exactly the kind of hypocritical way that the media he is attacking do.
Comment #27 (Posted by Jonathan)
First off, great piece.
Second, I hate Britney Spears.
Third, I think it's horrible how the media is treating her. On the radio this morning they were all making jokes about how she got out of the rubber room early. Hello? She doesn't possess the mental power to look after herself! You might as well make fun of retarded people.
Comment #28 (Posted by Matt Packer)
I'm inclined to disagree with John Campea over the differences in the two situations. While Ledger had no media-documented instances of excessive behavior, he was taking anxiety meds, and had admitted in at least one interview that his mind had been racing and he'd had poor sleep. He could have been experiencing his own decline, with no public fallout. Unlike Britney, he had not become pap-fodder - the showbiz press had no reason to think they should have been on his tail, but Brit's troubles were long-established. Devin's column is well-judged - I guess my frame of reference for this debate is Layne Staley from Alice in Chains. I adored that guy in the early to mid '90s, and he always seemed to be on the verge of an untimely demise at the height of his success. If it had happened then, it would have hit me really hard. By the time he eventually ODed in 2002, it just felt inevitable: he was a recluse - so far removed from his heyday, his work and the music world in general there were few ripple effects. If you take away the spotlight, the art and the cult of personality, all you're left with is an ordinary person making an all too ordinary mistake.
Comment #29 (Posted by crimsonsplendor)
i think a previous poster may have touched on this thought, but how exactly is a celebrity ODing any more of a tragedy than a homeless junkie found dead in an alley?
to be blunt, if you make the choice to use drugs recreationally and they get the best of you, you're the only one responsible for your fall.
as for brit brit, and i suppose any celebrity that has no problem using tabloid and gossip journalism when it's to their benefit, having the vultures circling the fucked up parts of your life is the price you pay for making sure your face is in print/on tv as much as possible. how many times have you seen Robert DeNiro or, shit, i dunno, Prince in the tabloids? seems to me that the only people in tabloids are marginally talented and more interested in being celebrities than actors/musicians.
Comment #30 (Posted by misquamacus)
I enjoyed the article and appreciate Devin's willingness to point out the sometimes nasty dynamics of today's culture. However, I'd like to add that this is a little bit apples to oranges.
Heath Ledger was a genuinely talented actor with many years of terrific performances behind/ahead of him. Therefore it is tragic* that he has expired, because we will not be able to see how he might have brought some incredible characters to life.
Inversely, Britney Spears never was talented. She's a product always has been, always will be. In fact, if she died it wouldn't really be tragic at all.(to the parties involved) She'd simply be fulfilling her role to its end. The ensuing scandal would be her final act of entertainment, her record sales would temporarily surge, the various media outlets would squeeze the last bit of money from her corpse and they'd all move on.
So any true humanist would have been feeling bad for her all the way back in 98 when she first began to be exploited by the media. If you're jumping on the bandwagon now, frankly, you're a little late to the party.
Sidney Lumet illustrated this principal effortlessly in "Network". How ironic that the brazen satire of yesteryear is the reality of today.
*(please note that when I say tragedy I'm speaking about the reaction of the general public. Of coarse death would be tragic to those that knew them personally, regardless of how the public at large feels.)
Comment #31 (Posted by Tennyson)
You make some very good points, Devin. My only response is that we work in a highly collaborative industry, and the fact that Heath Ledger has gotten all this support is probably as tied to his ability to work well with others as anything, and that counts for a lot. You make it sound as if all these people supporting him do it in an impersonal way, but at the core of it is a tight-knit group of family, friends, and supporters who loved him for who he was and what he did. The fact that Britney does not have the same support is also a commentary in and of itself. Yes, it's hard to befriend the mentally ill, and for that reason it's hard to sympathize with them until they are eventually portrayed by Robin Williams in half-baked docu-dramas, but the perception around her has as much to do with how she treats her closest collaborators and friends as it does how they treat her. At least until Robin Williams gets on it.
Comment #32 (Posted by Ann)
Oxycodone isn't necessarily Oxycontin -- it might also be Percoset or Percodan, depending upon what its complexed with. In either case, its extremely addictive.
I tend to agree with you, Devin. As a toxicologist myself, I can't imagine how any doctor or doctors would prescribe all that for someone who was supposedly only "not sleeping properly". Percoset and Vicodin are prescribed for people in extreme pain, after surgeries or for back pain, etc., so there is definitely more here than the press is letting on. It's still a tragic loss of a young life, no matter what. And no matter what you might think of Britney, that too is tragic.
Comment #33 (Posted by an unknown user)
While I agree with the fact that there is a double standard such as this, I would like you to re-consider this line: "I'd rather be on cocaine than Prozac any single day of the week". Have you been on Prozac, when it is correctly prescribed and not taken as the cure but as an aid to help in the actual process of healing? There is no way you can even mention cocaine and fluoxetine in the same sentence. That only speaks of ignorance and a total lack of experience and medical knowledge.
One can abuse any drug, from supermarket painkillers to morphine. But although you can abuse every single medicine in the world doesn't mean none of them cannot help when actually taken correctly.
Comment #34 (Posted by evilkinggumby)
Grats Devin. Nice to see you drummed up this much attention here and got people thinking. Posters and casual readers alike now have a better idea of both your points, and the drugs in question. I work in a dr's messaging and scheduling ofice and when i listed the drugs found to my co workers they gasped, as it's the kind of cocktail even some of our cancer and severe pain med pt's don't take. happily there was no methadone listed. then i wonder if the attitude would change.
Comment #35 (Posted by hellcat)
A couple of things.
RE: Psychiatric drugs - of course there are people who take them who don't need them, that's bound to happen. Does that mean that everyone who takes them should be stigmatized as a "trailer trash" drug addict? Of course not; there are people who REALLY need them, the way anyone with a disease needs medication, and the only ones who get to decide who really needs meds are doctors, psychiatrists, and patients themselves (all together).
RE: Britney v Heath - there's all kinds of gossip about now about both of them. Medical examiners found that Heath was taking small doses of prescription drugs that interacted fatally. A lot of people are now reporting that Britney suffered from bipolar disorder and was being drugged (and controlled, and abused) by Sam Lutfi. Personally, I think that even if neither of those reports are true, they both deserve our sympathy; certainly not scorn. People who are such major drug addicts that they OD and die, it's always a sad thing, period. Regardless of who they are or how much of a papparazzi target.
Comment #36 (Posted by SpamHammer)
Like a few others, I'm a bit mystified by the cocaine/Prozac bit but <shrug> sure, D- whatever.
Here's what I want to know- you can use Prozac recreationally??!! O.o
Comment #37 (Posted by Barbara)
I think the difference is that Heath Ledger lived his life quietly and didn't shove his afflictions in our face like Britney does. He didn't go around acting like he was entitled because he was a celeb. He treated people with respect and tried to live as normal a life as possible. Britney on the other hand has brought a great deal of this publicity on herself. I pass through phases of wondering if she is really mentally ill? If she was/is overtly psychotic the hospital wouldn't have released her. Seems she is able to control her behavior when she wants to. It will be inetersting to see how she acts w/o lutfi in the picture. If indeed he was feeding her drugs, that's abhorrent and evil. But so far, her behavior hasn't seemed to change one bit. I feel terribly sorry for her if she is mentally ill but truly do sometimes wonder
Comment #38 (Posted by Paige)
Great. Because you can only feel sorry for one celebrity at a time. Sympathy for both Brittany Spears and Heath Ledger? It's mutually exclusive. Apparently. In Devin Feraci's strange world of "oh look at me be contrary"-land.
Comment #39 (Posted by mike)
i think the two are very different.
everyone knows how the britney spears story will end. there's no her getting better, her being sane. she's never going to be looking back with a sane mindset, talking to an interviewer about how fucked up she was. she's crazy, she's on drugs, and she will probably soon die because of these things. i think everyone feels this way. this is expected, even if it doesn't actually happen.
heath ledger's death was completely unexpected. a young, respected actor rising to the top of his game, found dead. so unexpected, to the point that when my friend called me to tell me the news, i thought he was fucking with me.
"dude, did you hear who died?"
"no, who?"
"heath ledger"
"are you serious?"
"naw!!! i'm just fucking with you!!!"
that kind of thing. i dunno. i feel that these two people couldn't be further apart.
britney's eventual demise= expected
heath ledger's demise= completely unexpected
Comment #40 (Posted by an unknown user)
Please write about something more interesting!
Comment #41 (Posted by Zeke25:17)
Here's a difference for ya: if Britney died tomorrow, it wouldn't shock a soul; and the only people sorry about it would be the jackasses who make money every time she burps, farts or drives off with a baby on the car roof and the bag of chips and dip strapped safely into the infant seat. Brit, Lindsey, Paris: wastes of space. Pure and simple. And yet, THEY'RE still around. No balance in the universe.
Comment #42 (Posted by Up your butt)
I'm old and let me tell you kids something. Back in my day people used to prescribe something more powerful than any drugs when they felt down. Love and faith. Now we just pop pills and call it a cure. It's simply sad and now a little girl will grow up barely remembering her father...
Comment #43 (Posted by Ceej)
Nailed it. I couldn't agree more.
To Mike: I think to say that Brit is choosing to live her life openly while Heath chose to live it quietly is a bit misguided. I think that much attention is media-generated: like Devin said, the stalker-razzi has begun tracking Brits every. single. move.
Comment #44 (Posted by mike)
i never said anything about either one choosing to live their life that way. the point i was trying to make with my post was that the two deaths (if britney were to die) would be very different, mostly because i feel everyone expects britney to die an untimely death, whereas no one expected heath ledger to die at such a young age.
Comment #45 (Posted by Carolyn)
Very true. thanks for writing this Devin. it's a surreal world we live in today. Brad Renfro and Heath Ledger, Lindsay Lohan and Britney S. Unless we all speak honestly and loudly about drug and alcohol abuse when its happening the results are inevitable. Its all tragic. And much of it. preventable.
Comment #46 (Posted by Lin)
Oh my lord, Zeke.
"Here's a difference for ya: if Britney died tomorrow, it wouldn't shock a soul; and the only people sorry about it would be the jackasses who make money every time she burps, farts or drives off with a baby on the car roof and the bag of chips and dip strapped safely into the infant seat."
That just about made me pee my pants and fall out of my chair. Sad that I can completely picture that happening.
Comment #47 (Posted by Jenn)
I agree with this article 100%. People are so hypocritical when it comes to celebrity deaths/addictions. There is no reason why a healthy, 20 something year old should be taking that many drugs. Heath clearly had a problem.
People keep pointing out how no one would be surprised if Brit died because her behavior but we have no idea how Heath was in his personal life. Heath could have been a mess and the public would never know. A addict is an addict, regardless of their persona. While Brit, Lindsay, Paris and Co. obviously welcome the paparazzi, I can not think of a single male star that is regularly followed. I can almost guarantee there are male stars that behave as badly as some of the ladies but we never see or hear of it. Furthermore, Kristen Dunst and Eva Mendes are both currently in rehab, neither of which have been rumored to have problems, does that mean their drug problems really aren't that bad?
Comment #48 (Posted by sisterjane)
Ok here's a correction for you. Oxycontin is just brand name oxycodone with an extended release added to it. Percocet is oxycodone with tylenol. It is prescribed for moderate to sever pain & is one step up above vicodin (hydrocodone). It comes in milligrams from 5 to 80. It is prescribed for many things. Most people with cancer are prescribed much more than oxycodone it usually is prescribed for break through pain while a much stronger drug (fentenyl, dilaudid, demerol) are the main pain killers. There are many people who are prescribed oxycodone the big difference is how its taken. When you take as prescribed its a much needed medication but when your a drug addict & taking as much as you want & snorting, injecting it it's completely different. As I said as it is a step up from vicodin a lot of people will have both scrips. if the vicoden wasn't solving the pain issue... difference is most people don't take both at the same time.
Comment #49 (Posted by Ky)
I'm shocked at all the hate thats being sprewed at Ledger. I also believe it has something to do with him starring in that gay cowboy movie.
Anna Nicole's death got more respect than Ledger's and thats saying something. I'll be sure to unsubscribe from your podcast too. Don't feel like listening to more anti-heath talk. River Phoenix is still remembered fondly and he OD'd from heroine and cocaine, but Ledger's the bad guy right?
Comment #50 (Posted by cara)
so true. & don't get me started on merck & co. our country's biggest legal drug pusher.
Comment #51 (Posted by Dan)
That might be the most idiotic column I have ever read in my life. Well written...I give you that...but delusional. Devin - Are you for real, or was your article a joke? I have to believe and truly hope it was a joke. If it wasn't, I might suggest a job with "OMG!" @ yahoo.com....
Thank you John Campea for your posting. Nice to see someone is living in reality.

